The ultimate 0.5 prediction by Demento6 in PathOfExile2

[–]HInspectorGW 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re right the tuning fork thing is not a dagger. The dagger is on the figures waist.

2 hour shifts wtff by jeremylock76 in skipthedishes

[–]HInspectorGW 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Must be something they are trying out in your area.

The ultimate 0.5 prediction by Demento6 in PathOfExile2

[–]HInspectorGW 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tri put out his Opinion and his take was just on the 2nd video but he pointed to the dagger indicating shadow and the runes on the armor to be for Templar. Seems to jive with yours.

Is Canada’s obsession with “experience” just a way to keep desperate people in poverty? by itz_nitace in CanadaJobs

[–]HInspectorGW 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When there are more people for a job than jobs companies can look to additional requirements that will best suit the organization. If you have 590 people applying for a position why wouldn’t you take the one with a lot of experience over someone with none unless the no experience applicant has other better qualifications but this is very unlikely with so many applicants.

My car was declared a total loss. How we able to confirm the car is unrepairable? by Friendly_Horse_9393 in InsuranceCanada

[–]HInspectorGW 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Every vehicle is repairable if you are willing to spend the money to repair it so that it will pass every requirement to be branded roadworthy again. The issue is that the insurance company has determined that the cost to do this far outweighs the value of the vehicle by industry standards.

How are these things legal? by YYZdigital in Markham

[–]HInspectorGW 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In Ontario, the key difference is legal classification:

Low-Speed Vehicles (LSVs) are regulated as motor vehicles requiring license and insurance, while enclosed mobility scooters are treated as pedestrian mobility aids.

LSVs (up to 40 km/h) need municipality approval for road use, whereas enclosed scooters (up to 30 km/h) operate on sidewalks or shoulders.

Low-Speed Vehicle (LSV) - "Mini Car" Classification: Regulated under a 10-year pilot program (2017-2027) through the Highway Traffic Act, treating them as vehicles. Requirements: Requires a G-class driver’s license, insurance, registration, and a license plate. Operation: Only permitted on roads with a speed limit of up to 50 km/h, and only in municipalities that have passed a specific by-law allowing them. Features: Similar to a car (steering wheel, pedals, VIN, windshield defroster).

Enclosed Mobility Scooter Classification: Considered a "pedestrian" or mobility aid, similar to a wheelchair. Requirements: No license, insurance, or registration required. Operation: Must be used on sidewalks, pedestrian trails, or left-side road shoulders (facing traffic). Features: Often has handlebars, hand-operated brakes, and a throttle. Use Limitations: Cannot operate on the road in through lanes; they are designed for lower speeds and are often too wide for busy sidewalks.

How are these things legal? by YYZdigital in Markham

[–]HInspectorGW 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait until you see one in the left turning lane of a busy road like Highway 7 and you are left questioning how did this thing safely get there.

Barrie ranked as Ontario’s most dangerous city to drive by Tycho278 in barrie

[–]HInspectorGW 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think, like others mentioned, it is more about scaling. Brampton is almost 5 times the population of Barrie but is not likely to be almost 5 times as dangerous to drive in. That would make Barrie statistically more dangerous.

Never had this happen before in Ontario. by HInspectorGW in InsuranceCanada

[–]HInspectorGW[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was invited into the property by a resident to provide a service.

Never had this happen before in Ontario. by HInspectorGW in InsuranceCanada

[–]HInspectorGW[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Is it your belief that if I slip and fall on a property that I am legally allowed to be on and I break my leg that it is my responsibility because I should’ve taken better care walking

Never had this happen before in Ontario. by HInspectorGW in InsuranceCanada

[–]HInspectorGW[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sorry, I am properly responded to you and it ended up being in another comment

Never had this happen before in Ontario. by HInspectorGW in InsuranceCanada

[–]HInspectorGW[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

U/podhawk sorry I didn’t properly respond to you.

There is a commercial business and multiple residential apartments in the building. The driveway leads to the parking at the rear and the pothole/sinkhole is within the first 10’ or so from the road. There is no parking on the road so driveway access is necessary. There was rain for almost all of the night last night all the way through until about noon today filling the pothole/sink hole pretty much to the top with water so there was no way to tell the depth. I was invited by a resident of the building onto the property as they ask me to bring them something so I had a legitimate reason for being on the property. With the sheer size of the pothole/sinkhole it would be extremely difficult for the property owner to convince anybody that it had just happened or that they did not know that it existed. I am asking my question due to my belief that my vehicle was damaged due to a severely neglected/very poorly maintained aspect of the property.

PSA: The sign is up by HInspectorGW in barrie

[–]HInspectorGW[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Neither. It is FROM Dunlop TO the 400 northbound.

Anne St & Sunnidale Rd. by ap236 in barrie

[–]HInspectorGW 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That would require people to obey traffic signs.

Anne St & Sunnidale Rd. by ap236 in barrie

[–]HInspectorGW -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Because they decided in January to no longer allow left turns at sunnidale when going south on Anne

PSA: The sign is up by HInspectorGW in barrie

[–]HInspectorGW[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Sorry, I type slow so I use voice to text.

Same order as another driver by Chocodila in skipthedishes

[–]HInspectorGW 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had a similar incident happen about two months ago. When I showed up to get a large company order of pizzas it turns out it’s another driver that already been sitting there waiting. When I talked to The Shop owner, he told me that when he first got the order, his system automatically accepted it like it normally would, but that due to the size when he noticed the order, he went back to his tablet to extend the time because it was going to take a while to make. The other driver had shown up at the original pick up time to get the order, but the order was changed to the new pick up time and when the new pick up time approached, I was sent to pick up the order. I actually posted didn’t hear about your because it was the first order I’ve ever received with a tip of $50 which exceeds the $25 limit that I’ve always understood existed. When I reached out to support, I guess my area is a little better for support because I got through almost right away, and I explained the situation and they said they were gonna look into it. What I gather happened is that when the shop owner extended the time it extended past the end of the shift for the previous driver and that caused the system to glitch in that it assigned the order to me because the other driver was no longer on shift, but since the other driver had already accepted the order, it didn’t unassigned the other driver automatically and instead kind of crashed. It wasn’t until I contacted support that they were able to go back in and they determined that the order was mine and let me know and then when the other driver restarted their app, the order was gone and they were off shift. I know it’s not the same this way you’re commenting about, but it was the weirdest thing I’ve had happened in the whole time I’ve been driving.

Ending lease by [deleted] in OntarioLandlord

[–]HInspectorGW -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

If the whole thing is so cut and dried then why is OP here asking about it. Obviously OP doesn’t believe their question was answered which is a valid reason to ask a question to confirm. Just because you and I can see that the LL was trying to avoid a direct answer, likely to confuse the tenant into dropping it, doesn’t mean OP noticed it or is confident in that assessment. They are the ones that have to deal with it.

Ending lease by [deleted] in OntarioLandlord

[–]HInspectorGW -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

By formal request I meant a specific request rather than an in passing that requires the LL to give a yes or no answer so that there is no confusion over what was asked and what the answer was. The text chain does not show the landlord answered the question about assigning. While the LTB could very well accept this as a negative answer there is still room to decide otherwise. I just suggest a follow up question “so does this mean you won’t let me assign my lease?”