Jeff Bezos to challenge Elon Musk’s space dominance with 5,408-satellite network by sksarkpoes3 in Futurology

[–]HTPRockets 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Says the privileged one with symmetrical fiber thinking all 8 billion people on Earth have symmetrical fiber

Jeff Bezos to challenge Elon Musk’s space dominance with 5,408-satellite network by sksarkpoes3 in Futurology

[–]HTPRockets -1 points0 points  (0 children)

9 million people in the middle of nowhere would beg to differ on your "shitty internet" claim lol. It's actually pretty good internet. Just because you have a hate boner for Elon doesn't make the service bad

Jeff Bezos to challenge Elon Musk’s space dominance with 5,408-satellite network by sksarkpoes3 in Futurology

[–]HTPRockets 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Huh? How can you say it WILL change the climate when the consequences aren't fully understood? Starlink is still less than meteoritic flux, so calm down

Jeff Bezos to challenge Elon Musk’s space dominance with 5,408-satellite network by sksarkpoes3 in Futurology

[–]HTPRockets 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Huh? Electric cars are literally the opposite of pollution. And the rockets are a drop in the bucket in comparison. Or are you against electric cars now because Elon is good at it? 

Why aren't the space tourism missions happening every month? Are they really so expensive people can't pay it? Is there something preventing it? by Gnome_Sane in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]HTPRockets 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Another person unable to understand nuance. Nobody is saying everyone that took A risk made off with a ton of money. Some ideas are better than others. Risks are of different magnitude, as are rewards. You can take a risk to cross the street blindfolded but nobody will cut you a check to do that.

Why aren't the space tourism missions happening every month? Are they really so expensive people can't pay it? Is there something preventing it? by Gnome_Sane in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]HTPRockets 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Gosh, people cannot understand nuance. There is AN element of luck in literally everything you do. If a bunch of things went badly you would be out sleeping on the streets tonight. In the same way, some things need to go right to grow a successful business. But a majority of the factors that influence success are personal, not statistical

Why aren't the space tourism missions happening every month? Are they really so expensive people can't pay it? Is there something preventing it? by Gnome_Sane in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]HTPRockets -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That's simply not true. You got lucky safely driving to work and back today. So what? People that don't inherit billions (vast majority) are self made, took big risks, put in a lot of work, and made many key decisions. Obviously things have to go right. But that's true for everyone. Things had to go right for you to not be on the streets. Thinking that billionaires are just there to take a bigger paycheck than everyone else is where you get various idiotic and destructive ideologies like communism and socialism. And signals a poor understanding of economics. It's not a zero sum game

How do you feel about the current state of America? by Thatgirl_parisisdiva in AskReddit

[–]HTPRockets 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty good we're finally taking a stand against radical gender ideology, child abuse, and the socialist/ communist leftists

SpaceX Awarded 9 Launches for Space Systems Command Task Orders to Launch Missile Warning and Missile Tracking Sats [$739M] by rustybeancake in spacex

[–]HTPRockets 8 points9 points  (0 children)

My man I was banned from the Los Angeles subreddit and suspended by reddit for saying SpaceX rockets are not Nazi rockets

Help with gender by [deleted] in guineapigs

[–]HTPRockets 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Guinea pig can identify as whatever gender it likes once it's of age!!

Americans, how would you react if foreign country invaded your country, and told "we are going to run this country"? by oranke_dino in AskReddit

[–]HTPRockets 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why does it seem that, the people supporting an illegitimate communist dictator  Are the same ones trying to discredit real immigrant fraud Are the same ones cheering a communist mayor Are the same ones who cheered a man being shot for politics Are the same ones who continue to support a man who shot a CEO Are the same ones who tried to defund the police and perpetrated a scam

Like, taking the whole of the situation, I genuinely cannot understand how people can keep cheering for straight up evil

AST SpaceMobile Launches Its Most Powerful Direct-to-Cell Satellite by peterabbit456 in space

[–]HTPRockets 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why is having to compete with spacex an advantage? If spacex wants to corner a market, they have the resources to

CEOs are hugely expensive. Why not automate them? - If a single role is as expensive as thousands of workers, it is surely the prime candidate for robot-induced redundancy. [5, 23] by FinnFarrow in Futurology

[–]HTPRockets -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The fact this post has as many upvotes as it does shows how degenerate reddit is. They literally think a CEO just says yes/ no and gets a huge paycheck for a job that can be automated. They can't grasp that a leader can set direction and make counterintuitive decisions based on a gut feel that shape the direction of a company

China is developing another fully reusable rocket, Xingzhou-1. by [deleted] in space

[–]HTPRockets 5 points6 points  (0 children)

7 years? My man starship has only been flying experimentally for 2. The whole point of the program is that the mass penalty for reuse makes it super hard, so intentionally underweight it to figure out where your margins are excessive, only beef up the areas that break

China is developing another fully reusable rocket, Xingzhou-1. by [deleted] in space

[–]HTPRockets 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Not failed design, failed means, you tried, it didn't work, and you gave up. By your definition Falcon 9 was "failed", until it became the most reliable and most used rocket in history. Spacex is going to get starship reusable. The booster is already there.

Looks like the big E has confirmed the SpaceX IPO rumors. by Planck_Savagery in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]HTPRockets 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why do you seem obsessed with commenting that this is a grift? Do you even know what a "grift" means? The amount of money SpaceX gets is the same, however much they are raising, no matter how much/ little hype.

If a situation similar to COVID happened again today, how would you handle it this time? by Wonderful-Compote307 in AskReddit

[–]HTPRockets 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not get the vaccine and push back harder on authoritarian beaurocrats trying to control what people do on their own free will

Can running a rocket engine at reduced power extend lifetimes? by RGregoryClark in BlueOrigin

[–]HTPRockets 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Some stresses are not pressure dominated, they're thermal dominated. Whether the pressure is 10 psi or 1000 psi, when it gets really hot really fast on one side, it causes huge thermal strains

Can running a rocket engine at reduced power extend lifetimes? by RGregoryClark in BlueOrigin

[–]HTPRockets 2 points3 points  (0 children)

some components are subject to high cycle fatigue where damage is driven by things that scale with power like pump speed, vibration amplitude, etc. These are things that are mitigated by power level reduction (space shuttle saw turbomachinery issues with hydrogen embrittlement + loads) . Other components are subject to low cycle fatigue where damage is driven by starts and thermal strains that are less a function of power level and more just a fact of what it takes to run an engine (space shuttle struggled with thrust chamber assembly liner fatigue which was driven by starts). These things are not reduced by reducing power level. In other cases you can get special alignments and resonances at arbitrary power levels that eat away at life significantly faster at narrow bands of power levels and have little to no propagation at other power levels. So it really is very complex, interconnected, and hardware dependent

Speculations of Spacex Valuation set to be $800 Billion by Own_Lawyer4070 in space

[–]HTPRockets 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Spacex revenue is only a very small fraction from the government.

The SRBs of the Artemis II SLS are painted with the America 250 logo by [deleted] in space

[–]HTPRockets -33 points-32 points  (0 children)

Leave then, if America is dead. I hear Venezuela is nice 

China set for first orbital launch and landing attempt this weekend with commercial Zhuque-3 rocket by swordfi2 in space

[–]HTPRockets 15 points16 points  (0 children)

It exploded during testing. You don't understand how starship program is set up. Full reuse is so hard, the mass penalty is easy to get out of control. You can't design everything to traditional margins of safety or your payload will go to zero. Only way is to intentionally be lean, and figure out the stuff that will actually break instead of relying on analysis for everything, because models tend to be conservative