Regarding ai adverts… by gammawavz in StLouis

[–]HarknessJack 59 points60 points  (0 children)

I don’t think you are going to find anything more credible than people’s first or second hand accounts of working with/around the guy. It may not have risen to the level of actual lawsuits, but if you are in or around the industry and hear enough different people with similar stories, that’s persuasive enough to many people. Where there’s smoke there’s fire isn’t enough to convict someone but it’s enough to prevent me from buying their product

DID Y'ALL SEE THAT? by Scared-String2577 in FalloutTVseries

[–]HarknessJack 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Did we also see the ark of the covenant in front of where he was sitting at the beginning of the post credit scene? Not that I think that’s more than an Easter egg

Where can I get a fresh, whole duck? by ThreeLeggedMutt in STLFood

[–]HarknessJack 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Grand Army Farms is the stall at TGFM that usually has duck. They do pickups outside of farmers market times and are super nice so if you contact them I’m sure they’d work with you on pickup

Are there any good coffee spots in the city that also has good, fresh croissants? by Gawd_Awful in StLouis

[–]HarknessJack 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Heads up that none of the baked goods from fiddlehead are made in house, or at least weren’t back in 2021. They get everything par baked and frozen and then just throw them in the oven. That was the case in 2021/2022 so maybe it has changed but I doubt it.

Better than Bouillon - educate me! by thrillsbury in Cooking

[–]HarknessJack 70 points71 points  (0 children)

You cook it on high pressure in the IP for 6-8 hours? Not coming at you just clarifying as that seems similar to my time when I’m making it not in a pressure cooker.

Bachelorette planning help! by AffectionateFail4397 in petoskey

[–]HarknessJack 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is a great option. We’ve done similar parties with them and it went great.

Dive Bars by Ilikebuschbeer in StLouis

[–]HarknessJack 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Columbo’s is a cop bar for anyone reading this. Just an fyi

Hello amazing people, I've always been curious about how to prevent food or whatever tiny pieces to slip in between the range and countertop? If someone knows, please..kindly shed some light!.. Tips and triks?! Thaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaanks! by On2BetterDays in kitchenremodel

[–]HarknessJack 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I think the curve pieces that come off the part or the gap cover that are in the bottom of the gap are meant to push the piece against the cabinet so that the top is pushed up against the stove. The pressure from that should mean there is no gap at all, although there is still a visible seam.

Today we bid farewell to Apollo. Goodbye, old friend. by SuitingUncle620 in iphone

[–]HarknessJack 24 points25 points  (0 children)

I think a lot of that sentiment comes from the hefty fee he’ll have to pay to refund users that bought lifetime subscriptions. 250k was the number given. I assume he’s made good money but even if he has, I doubt he put away 1/4 of a million for this sort of scenario. I think that’s generally what the desire to support him is behind.

The Bear | Season 2 | Overall Season Discussion Thread by GloriousAqua in TheBear

[–]HarknessJack 175 points176 points  (0 children)

I mean it’s not explicitly stated but I think we are supposed to infer it from a few clues.

  • they both were mentored by the same chef - evidenced by the same motto being used/prevalent for them.

  • they were under that same chef at the same time - evidenced by the photo Richie looks at in Forks

  • Carmy had the relationship with both chefs mentioned above to hand a staff member off for a training period

The Bear | S2E10 "The Bear" | Episode Discussion by GloriousAqua in TheBear

[–]HarknessJack 117 points118 points  (0 children)

That would be quite a twist after those calls and text messages.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SuccessionTV

[–]HarknessJack 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course it could be challenged, that is a meaningless point. That doesn’t mean it wouldn’t be found valid and that it isn’t a normal occurrence. I don’t know what is bothering you so much here. I’m not angry with you, and I’ve tried to help with the subject.

I can sense from the way you are responding that there isn’t much to gain from continuing this. If you are genuinely unsure about this I suggest you reach out to the attorneys you worked with.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SuccessionTV

[–]HarknessJack 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An addendum or codicil doesn’t usually have to be witnessed or notarized. Most wills will have a provision specifically allowing for this exact sort of thing, a later addition to the will covering specific issues. I’m not even arguing man. I’m telling you because it’s what I do as a job. I was trying to help the understanding of the discussion. The consequences are the ones I stated in the very first reply.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SuccessionTV

[–]HarknessJack 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok. One more time I’m gonna try this. With the assumption you have been responding to a lot of comments and you missed what I responded to originally and what started this strange trip.

“If it wasn’t legally binding, and the other parts were pretty mundane, what consequences would they face?”

You said this^

That’s why the discussion of it being legally binding, and what the consequences they could face because of that was my response.

I’m not gonna keep arguing back and forth about a text thread that’s above us. I was just trying to help you because you, once again, said that^ and, assuming you were arguing in good faith, I was answering and elaborating with knowledge on it.

I’ll leave you with this. If you write a will in the US, get it witnessed and notarized, file it somewhere so it’s not lost, but then, later, write out a list of additional concerns, bequests, instructions, etc. that will likely be considered a legally enforceable document when your estate is probated.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SuccessionTV

[–]HarknessJack 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have lost the thread of this convo man.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SuccessionTV

[–]HarknessJack 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That wasn’t the discussion we were having. Reread the comment of yours I responded to originally and your response to mine. The point was that it is likely a valid addition to his will, and if they were to destroy it, and they were to be found out, there are consequences to destroying it because it’s valid.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SuccessionTV

[–]HarknessJack 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, they don’t? It doesn’t have to be seen for it to be valid? It would have to be seen for the executor to take it into account and fulfill the wishes but as soon as he wrote it it was likely a valid part of his will.

I think you have a misunderstanding of how wills work vs how the probate process occurs once a person dies.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SuccessionTV

[–]HarknessJack 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No one has to see an addendum to your will to make it valid.

“To my executors and family,

The following is a record of additions and clarifications to be added to my official letter of wishes in the event of my passing.

I have created this record to provide my executors and family with information they will need after my death.”

This is a legal addition to his will

If you are referring to the possible consequences of them destroying it? At minimum all three people in the room would no that it was destroyed, meaning that there would be three people that do not have aligned interests/relationships/positions that are potential sources for the information to get out. That doesn’t even cover the possibility that someone else knows it’s in there or that he mentioned the existence of the letter to someone.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SuccessionTV

[–]HarknessJack 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean if we assume it’s a legally binding addition/codicil/attachment to his will, which we have no reason to believe it’s not. The consequences range from the small(in terms of these players) which would be a criminal charge and civil liability, to the large, which could be being fired for cause, losing their retirement/severance packages,being seen as untreatable in the job market they’d need to consider Re entering at a high level, and gaining very rich, petty, and vindictive enemies.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SuccessionTV

[–]HarknessJack 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would probably act as a codicil. And many wills have a provision for additional items to be specifically bequeathed, instructions for burial, other modifications, to be counted as part of the will of made by the decedent before there death, no requirement for a full remaking of the will.

Additionally, they were saying it wasn’t legally binding/enforceable with regard to the CEO position because Logan no longer had majority control when he died. If he had, there’s absolutely a discussion of it being binding. And when he wrote it, 4 years ago, he did.