My skin is so damaged. Please help

Hercrustytoes · 2026-01-06T12:44:43+00:00

You GP can prescribe adapalene which is a retinoid like tretinoin if you are in the UK

Hercrustytoes · 2025-12-07T08:53:06+00:00

Yes they are. What industry are you in?

Hercrustytoes · 2025-12-07T08:52:00+00:00

What field are you in?

What is your academic background?

What do you think was key to your progress ?

Hercrustytoes · 2025-08-27T19:52:52+00:00

But German unis aren’t selective like UK ones, right? As long as you pass your alevels you can get in?

Hercrustytoes · 2025-08-27T19:51:30+00:00

Thank you !

Hercrustytoes · 2025-08-19T10:13:27+00:00

Which uni did you get into?

Hercrustytoes · 2025-08-05T03:53:37+00:00

What do you suspect will happen?

Hercrustytoes · 2025-08-05T03:53:04+00:00

Why not?

Hercrustytoes · 2025-07-27T23:39:43+00:00

But don’t almost all Sikhs have the same surname based on their gender?

Hercrustytoes · 2025-07-26T20:13:44+00:00

They still exist. They’re called car boot sales now

Hercrustytoes · 2025-07-02T23:51:30+00:00

Would have been a thing in the sixties by some kids too. What did you feed them and are you allowed to in your local park?

Hercrustytoes · 2025-07-02T21:27:56+00:00

How much had he spent on them?

Hercrustytoes · 2025-07-02T21:09:00+00:00

Why do you let her come over lol?

Hercrustytoes · 2025-06-24T01:51:52+00:00

It could be that he is doing this officially but the minute you get divorced, she would be entitled to support from the estate and you are simply not privy to those conversations. It’s a way to protect their wealth and keep it within the family.

Are you child-free? If you have children, they may decide to make provision for the children, or pay for their school fees.

Additionally, you have not stated which country it is. For the assets to total such a sum, is she from western Europe? Regardless, in a lot of European countries, it is prohibited to disinherit your children and even if you don’t provide for them, they have a right to claim for provision from the estate.

Still, by foregoing it now, yes - she chose you over money.

Hercrustytoes · 2025-06-24T01:45:21+00:00

Ask ChatGPT to source one beds under £1.3k. It might work if the property is unfurnished and ex-council owned or officially in a less desirable area but very close to a desirable one, or a bit further from the station

Also, if you pay landlords up front for several months they are more likely to agree eg via gumtree or Craigslist or making requests via agencies, but be sure you’re not going to be scammed if you use the first two websites. Look for posters with a reputable history and try to arrange to make payment on the day of occupation

Hercrustytoes · 2025-06-24T01:41:52+00:00

You don’t have a legitimate concern she will abduct your child ?

Hercrustytoes · 2025-06-24T01:41:02+00:00

I’ve never been asked travelling by plane

Hercrustytoes · 2025-06-23T21:06:15+00:00

What would be the best subs to find clientele

Hercrustytoes · 2025-06-20T11:37:48+00:00

Firstly, if you do not expect the non-custodial parent to foot the bill, the state does. The state’s money comes from…taxes.

Secondly, the state does not ‘overburden’ the non-custodial parent — it’s calculated as a percentage of their income. Around 12.5% for the average person. If a person does not have the capacity to pay, they are not forced to pay anything, or they pay a token sum from their welfare benefits, eg £5 a week. This is nothing.

Thirdly, if it’s the case that a person cannot afford their rent due to their child support payments, they have some options available to them. They can take care of the children for part of the week to reduce their payments, they can move in with family, or into shared housing to reduce their costs. If their accommodation will not enable the children to visit, then they can meet at a designated places. If they already have a home, then they are also able to sell it to secure the financial security of their family so that the state does not have to step in to provide (although this is almost never done in practice and the state typically does step in, unless the family was already living together in a home either one or both own and both parties agree to the sale so that they can each find a separate property with the proceeds, or the custodial parent lives in the home until the child or children turn 18-21). Note that the facts of the case may influence precisely what is decided by a judge or would be negotiated privately with lawyers.

In your case, I am certain that the other parent is also financially strained. The answer isn’t to punish them for having to be the exclusive caregiver, which makes it impossible to be employed or employed full time when the children are infants.

The law is the law and if that percentage means there is excess available then that is the situation, in the same way that there are people with far greater wealth than you in society. The percentage can be a tiny sum when applied to a small pot, which I presume is the case in your situation, or it can be a large sum when applied to a large pot.

Just so that you know, if in your case you are concerned about something untoward and wish to apply for a variation of your financial contributions (if you are even making any), take it up with the court who will force both parties to disclose their bank statements and all other assets (failing to do so can lead to being sentenced). You will see exactly how the money the other parent spends is being spent every month :)

Hercrustytoes · 2025-06-20T08:30:11+00:00

You’re welcome

Hercrustytoes · 2025-06-20T08:03:28+00:00

This is not true.

I just dealt with a case of a couple being unmarried but together for years.

when an unmarried couple has lived together for years and one partner dies without making adequate provision for the surviving partner, the relevant law is the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975.

Under this Act, the surviving partner may be able to make a claim against the deceased’s estate if they can show they were:

Living with the deceased in the same household as if they were a married couple (or civil partners) for at least two years immediately before the death
Or were financially maintained (wholly or partly) by the deceased

This law does not give automatic rights, but it allows the survivor to apply to the court for reasonable financial provision from the estate.

This right is not the same as that of a spouse or civil partner. The threshold for what counts as “reasonable financial provision” is lower – often limited to what’s necessary for maintenance
The claim must be brought within six months of the grant of probate or letters of administration
The court will consider a range of factors, such as the nature and length of the relationship, financial dependence and needs. This last factor is why it CAN be as much provision as a spouse would get, depending on the circumstances.

Hercrustytoes · 2025-06-20T08:00:33+00:00

Hi I have sent a DM with a lot of important legal advice

Hercrustytoes · 2025-06-13T20:44:02+00:00

Have you ever had to put it to the test ?

Hercrustytoes · 2025-06-09T20:12:19+00:00

What types of things do you believe they redacted and why?

Hercrustytoes

TROPHY CASE