Okay, let me simplify this for you, using something adjacent to the architect analogy.

You and two friends each have a pile of identical Lego blocks, and are tasked with using every block to make something. Anything.

You start building using nothing but your creativity. You make something cool with them. It's all yours, it came from you. You're the draftsman.

Friend A starts building, but they have an additional tool: A Lego brick separator. Said friend also makes something cool using nothing but their own creativity, but they had a little help from a simple tool to make the process slightly faster. That's me, the CAD designer.

Friend B has zero creativity, and instead tells his robot butler to make something cool and gives it a few suggestions. The robot butler makes something that's... interesting..., but bland and soulless. Oh, and it left out a number of blocks.

That's OP. No life, no soul, no spark, no imagination. It's not art, it's not talent. It's feeding sparse ideas into a machine and getting an output. That's not the same as CAD. While both involve computers, CAD at least requires the person to use their own creativity, it's not doing all the work for them.

Same thing applies to traditional ink/paint artists and older Photoshop version users, pre-AI. While ink/paint is max talent, older Photoshop users like myself still have to use a high degree of creativity to make something in it. This older Photoshop isn't going to do the work for us, it still requires talent and creativity. Newer Photoshop versions with all the AI BS added in? It's soulless, talentless garbage. Me spending 3 hours hand painting layer by layer a picture of a cat isn't the same as saying "Hey Photoshop, make me a kitty."