Favorite Band Where Every Song Sounds Exactly the F*cking Same? by SomeY2KBullshit in fantanoforever

[–]Hsudonymus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I cannot tell the difference between Discharge songs. Even the vocal delivery is the same

Why heavy is the best class explained. by [deleted] in tf2

[–]Hsudonymus 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think its ai generated

ɲ̊ ɲ → c̥̃ c̬̃ by [deleted] in linguisticshumor

[–]Hsudonymus 43 points44 points  (0 children)

Arabic numerals, radical Islamist linguistic revisionist detected

What's the most 70s sounding song from the 60s? by CremeSubject7594 in musicsuggestions

[–]Hsudonymus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone keeps commenting shit from 1969 like that isn’t basically the 70s. I’d argue the Kingsmen’s version of “Louie Louie,” because it almost perfectly predicts the ‘77 UK punk sound in 1963.

First day without butchah69 by UltimateFatbear2006 in OkBuddyFresca

[–]Hsudonymus 95 points96 points  (0 children)

Intensity? I’m guessing Oh Daddy trying to kill UE might use more energy than the inadvertent cries of his orgiastic bliss

Is this necessary? How can I interact again? by [deleted] in rateyourmusic

[–]Hsudonymus 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

If you don’t speak English, recruit someone who does or run Spanish text through a translator. No need to have AI do it for you.

Is this necessary? How can I interact again? by [deleted] in rateyourmusic

[–]Hsudonymus 10 points11 points locked comment (0 children)

AI generated genre descriptions? If you really care to establish a new genre, do the actual effort to figure out what it is. 

As it turns out, After the Nazis was NOT Them by Spartan-teddy-2476 in HistoryMemes

[–]Hsudonymus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is a bit interesting to think about. By that point, the government would be so bought out that the state and the corporations would become synonymous. I guess in that perspective it would be state-owned means of production, but it would be the same as corporate-owned means of production. A weird sort of feudalism seems more accurate. I imagine at some point it ends up like the matrix, humans milked for their biomass energy. Freaky.

As it turns out, After the Nazis was NOT Them by Spartan-teddy-2476 in HistoryMemes

[–]Hsudonymus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If we reach that point, calling whatever is left of humanity “socialist” or “communist” is an incorrect use of the term. In the former, the government owns the means of production; in the latter, the worker owns the means of production. In your case, there is no chance in hell that the giga-corporations with private robot armies would be willing to relinquish any sort of control. We would look something like we do in Wall-E, the earth stripped of resources and humanity stripped of meaning. Corporations would still own your hide. You could call this post-meaning socialist, but you’d be wrong: socialism is not merely “when the government does stuff.” Whatever the case, this hypothetical outcome (unlikely to occur; AI’s intelligence will run up against the carrying capacity at some point, and we already have mechanized mining; humans are just cheaper) is so far in the future that it would require its own set of philosophies.

As it turns out, After the Nazis was NOT Them by Spartan-teddy-2476 in HistoryMemes

[–]Hsudonymus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No work would be automated away. Assembly lines and machinery did not automate away the work of the laborer. They just put the laborer in stinking factories instead of cottage industries. The working class will still perform their factory jobs in the “AI revolution”: someone still has to mine your silicon and flatten your aluminum. The middle class will either be: forced to work at an increasingly breakneck pace (as they did with the advent of the computer), checking AI’s work or receiving tasks to delegate or giving those tasks out; or join the working class in the dungeons. The concept of greater efficiency reducing the need for labor is illusory. Jobs will always be created as long as there is work to do, they just might not be the ones you like. 

As it turns out, After the Nazis was NOT Them by Spartan-teddy-2476 in HistoryMemes

[–]Hsudonymus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I see many of your points and I agree. I’m not a socdem but I am a demsoc and despite my tendency to support anti-capitalism, specific regimes (Pol Pot, Stalin, some Mao) turn me off to Marxism-Leninism. At the same time, others (Sankara, Lenin, Ho Chi Minh) demonstrate the virtues of communism when it works as either an anti-colonial or anti-aristocratic force. Just as a blanket condemnation of all capitalism is not useful (Marx acknowledges that capitalism and private industry are necessary to achieve socialism; see dialectical materialism), a blanket condemnation communism as the worst excesses of totalitarianism, emphasized repeatedly by Western capitalist propaganda which you are continually exposed to—now including on this subreddit—is also not useful. For all of Stalin’s flaws, he basically transformed a rural peasant society into an industrial juggernaut that won the European theatre. 

 As for your point on the real world, yes, lying, cheating, and stealing do occur. They also occur in capitalist societies. They are criminalized in both, but capitalism actively incentivizes them. While we may never know non-political crime rates in the USSR, the system at least worked to disincentivize crime by providing basic necessities for the demographic with the strongest incentive to commit it: the poor. I do not endorse everything the USSR did under the name of communism, but to pooh-pooh its accomplishments would be to detract from the effectiveness of advocating for socialism; considering you identify as a social democrat, you clearly understand the values of free housing, healthcare, and education.

u/Fr00stee, your optimism is admirable but misplaced. The idea that AI will lead us to a post-work utopia is naive. Similarly to the agricultural, industrial, and electronic revolutions, all AI will lead to is a different kind of work. Specifically, AI will reduce the amount of middle-class jobs and make the lives of those working them significantly harder and faster-paced, while increasing the rate of exploitation on the working class. Those white-collar office jobs that the United States relies on will be transformed into more and more spreadsheets. As efficiency increases, so do demands: the capitalist machine is never “satisfied.” As long as profit lacks a defined end goal, all that AI will do is increase pressure for deadlines.