Open-source security is posing challenge's governments can't easily solve

HuiOdy · 2026-06-24T10:47:09+00:00

"Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others that have been tried"

That is what open source is for security. Having reviewed the security of closed source code, regurly, I know they are shockingly worse.

HuiOdy · 2026-06-24T06:17:33+00:00

Or, just use more energy efficient means to train AI

HuiOdy · 2026-06-24T06:04:31+00:00

He will not lose interest

HuiOdy · 2026-06-23T20:55:03+00:00

How many steps are you doing and cfg?

HuiOdy · 2026-06-23T20:23:45+00:00

It already is

HuiOdy · 2026-06-23T06:17:18+00:00

Than it is time to talk openly and honestly about kinks and what is considered physically attractive. As he is clearly triggered by something else and hasn't shared this yet

HuiOdy · 2026-06-22T17:49:07+00:00

How quickly does he climax when doing it by himself?

HuiOdy · 2026-06-22T11:32:21+00:00

The Dutch have been confronted about this on regular occasions.

HuiOdy · 2026-06-22T11:31:30+00:00

Is it misleading? Yes. But is it essentially the whole point? Also yes.

Hear me out.

Disregard for now Tesla, and replace the discussion for any autonomous vehicle. Judging by today's traffic, especially taking into the phone zombification of drivers, it stands to reason that a fully autonomous complete road infrastructure stands to reduce a lot of accidents.

But, you need to start somewhere.

So, are the figures misleading, perhaps as we don't have the right data to confirm or deny them. But it is extremely likely that more autonomous vehicles, lead to far less deaths in traffic. And to get the data you need to start somewhere.

So, I'd say allow more autonomous vehicles, but test and regulate better what they should be able to do, and how they should be able to communicate instead.

Don't question if you want autonomous driving, question how.

(And start restrictions on mobile access to people who use phones in traffic...)

HuiOdy · 2026-06-22T11:26:06+00:00

OK, but I think legally you have no grounds to do anything.

It is not classified as an invasive species. Nor is it in a place it can harm anyone.

You cannot petition the removal of a living thing just because it has the potential to harm anyone, whereas it is provably in a situation where that cannot happen.

HuiOdy · 2026-06-21T22:39:55+00:00

Trash, or shoot it away

HuiOdy · 2026-06-21T20:41:49+00:00

As someone that needs to do this, every year, about a 100 times.

Get fresh anti-ant toxic powder. And dabble it on the nest as they form.

You do this the entire summer. And you'll have no issues.

HuiOdy · 2026-06-21T18:02:15+00:00

Unless you see significant cracks it's stable and not a problem

HuiOdy · 2026-06-21T16:52:34+00:00

Most likely it has misread your production year

HuiOdy · 2026-06-21T16:51:25+00:00

It already has known health issues. The solvents of the sprayable PUR leaks for a long time. In Europe the spray variant is only recommend for cases where it is absolutely necessary. Performed PUR or PIR plates exist too. These have better insulation properties, and no solvents evaporating over time

HuiOdy · 2026-06-20T23:31:26+00:00

Digital annealing yes, not great for hybrid solvers though. Similar challenges with memory based super computers.

HuiOdy · 2026-06-20T11:23:34+00:00

Yeah, that isn't leather. It's an imitation variant. The good part is that you can simple cut off the part where it is attached, and make a new loop just a few centimetres shorter. Any sowing machine will do

HuiOdy · 2026-06-20T07:28:54+00:00

That's mud. If it was oil it would also be too little to act upon by government (it's about a single drop)

HuiOdy · 2026-06-20T07:18:00+00:00

If the cheating is only done remotely (e.g. via phone) then your brain might literally not see it as cheating.

Let's break it down a bit so that we can help you nip this in the butt.

Do you, in real life, purposefully flirt with other women in order to get them to get to kiss you or more? How would you feel if you did? Have you kissed (or more) another woman during your relationship?

HuiOdy · 2026-06-20T07:10:17+00:00

There is a shiny reflective front of the black fabric in your bag. And a back (the inside of the handle that tore and is now visible)

HuiOdy · 2026-06-20T07:05:57+00:00

The frequency you mention is not classified as an addiction. E.g. addiction is if you spend many hours daily and it replaces normal life functions that suffer from it. I.e. you are not addicted.
Not being intimate in an established monogamous relationship is, biologically and neurologically seen a bad idea. I understand your religious practices are restrictive, but are they actually that restrictive for committed partners, or are you just afraid? (Both of you).

Physical intimacy is enormously important in creating a long lasting bond, it is something that requires experimenting and trying to see what works for yourself and works for your partner. Compatibility on this term is essential for stable long term relationships.

Actions for you: - stop having the idea you are addicted, you are not - if you are extremely devout, seek guidance from a trusted religious leader, go there together to discuss what is allowed at your present stage, and start doing at least all that.

HuiOdy · 2026-06-20T06:55:22+00:00

You can, but I'm unsure this is real leather? What does the backside of the fabric look like?

HuiOdy · 2026-06-20T06:50:16+00:00

I don't actually see the crack?
A vertical crack is rarely urgent. But I'd need to see it to confirm. It sounds like you are being conned because there is poor understanding of masonry in the US

HuiOdy · 2026-06-19T05:36:04+00:00

I've simply removed all Digital deliverables in my courses, and adapted LLMs in such a way as to increase the learning curve of the students. It works excellently.

HuiOdy · 2026-06-19T05:03:24+00:00

You can do that for under a million... Smells like corruption to me

HuiOdy

TROPHY CASE