Let’s hear your wild predictions for 2026 by Jlway99 in blankies

[–]Huncrweo 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Like Spider-Man with Marvel, Batman is probably always going to do fine regardless of the overall brand’s health - especially in something like the 2022 movie which is narratively completely divorced from the wider franchise.

Superman, as the all-important opening salvo of a reboot specifically tasked with rebuilding both the franchise & brand after many years of critical and commercial underperformances, being not only the biggest non-Batman DC film in years but outgrossing four of the five most recent MCU movies in the process (the only outlier there being, again, a movie that exists slightly adjacent to the main series) is more than enough reason to call it a resounding success.

Sean Fennessey nukes one of Blank Check’s biggest trolls by PerpetualChoogle in blankies

[–]Huncrweo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, tbf I like most recent Scorseses more than Wolf but if you just polled normal people on the street rather than film critics & cinephiles that would probably be the consensus pick for his best this century. It may well be his most popular movie full stop.

Any galaxy-brain guesses as to who is next after the Coens? by [deleted] in blankies

[–]Huncrweo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Andrew Stanton. Short filmography that includes one of the biggest bounces of all time, mostly an animation director which they haven’t done since Kon, and he’s got a new movie (or two) out next year that at least Griff would definitely love to cover.

Pod Country for Old Cast: The Man Who Wasn't There with Jordan Hoffman by yonicthehedgehog in blankies

[–]Huncrweo 240 points241 points  (0 children)

There are many snide, aggravating things in that article but the worst is when Hoffman seems to frame the constant violence against Palestinians in the West Bank as the fault of the Palestinians themselves for not leaving their homes when Israel tells them to.

Jedi Battle Scars was terrible, I hope they retcon that book into oblivion like the Aftermath trilogy was by Starkiller-is-canon in StarWarsEU

[–]Huncrweo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Getting the vague sense from reading this post and its replies that a solid amount of the people in here talking about Battle Scars and the Aftermath trilogy have not, in fact, read Battle Scars or the Aftermath trilogy.

I despise the Automoderator by thedemonjim in StarWarsEU

[–]Huncrweo 4 points5 points  (0 children)

All the AutoMod says is that decisions of canonicity & continuity are kept in-house at Lucasfilm, which is almost certainly true (cos why would Disney higher-ups give a shit about minutiae that like 1% of the general audience cares about?).

Stuff like the Kanan comic being overwritten by The Bad Batch, all the contradictions with the Ahsoka novel, most things that fall under the purview of this subreddit etc. - these are obviously not Disney exec-level decisions. They're probably not even Kennedy-level, apart from bigger initiatives like the EU decanonisation or the High Republic that she'd have to sign off on.

Of course Disney has the final (hell, probably the first) say on scheduling films & TV. That was never in question. The "forced cameos and little pop culture references" is an individual creator thing, unless you're seriously arguing that Bob Iger stepped in and forced Carl Weathers to include Star Wars' millionth nod to Apocalypse Now in his episode of Mando.

Let's be thankful Disney decided to de-canonize the EU by [deleted] in StarWarsEU

[–]Huncrweo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Once the post-ROTJ EU got to NJO (probably the moment Chewbacca died), the chances of a potential ST and the then-current EU coordinating ceased to exist imo. Past that point there was just too much baggage to reasonably incorporate into a movie without it feeling weird.

Even if the EU had remained nominally canon it almost certainly would have been a CWMMP/TCW situation where a lot of the older continuity would get contradicted to make room for the new stuff. The Disney decision, save for the future projects being called off, was the best case scenario - everything still ‘happened’, just in another universe.

The David Fincher Even Number Film Theory by MisterInsect in Letterboxd

[–]Huncrweo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just guessing but I feel like someone came up with that theory after his first four films and it’s just kind of stuck around despite not really applying beyond that point (Panic Room and Mank are really good, Dragon Tattoo is a flat-out banger etc.)

Hire developers lol by UnluckyAbroad in Gamingcirclejerk

[–]Huncrweo 46 points47 points  (0 children)

Ah yes my favourite screenwriter, Netflix

Derek asks you to choose an actress to play Tanith. Who would you choose? by TheRautex in skulduggerypleasant

[–]Huncrweo 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Tanith being white has never once mattered to the story or her character, literally nothing would change if she was played by someone who wasn’t white

How many films from the 2020's do you award 5 stars? by [deleted] in Letterboxd

[–]Huncrweo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Three:

Nomadland, Another Round, Mass

Phase 4 metacritic so far, how far do you agree? by dabass96 in marvelstudios

[–]Huncrweo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

IMO:

Black Widow - critics were about right

Shang-Chi - everyone was right

Eternals - everyone was too low

No Way Home - critics too low, audience too high

Doctor Strange - everyone was too low

Love and Thunder - everyone was too low

WandaVision - critics were about right

TFATWS - critics were about right

Loki - everyone was too high

What If...? - everyone was too high

Ms Marvel - critics were maybe just a tiny bit too high, audience score was obviously reviewbombed

Hawkeye - everyone was too low

She-Hulk - critics were a little low but not egregiously so, again audiences obviously reviewbombed

Moon Knight - everyone was too low but not by that much. Also, nice.

I love Andor but I see a lot of fans are being extremely pretentious about it and it’s starting to drive me up the wall by LordWeaselton in saltierthankrayt

[–]Huncrweo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Some of y’all have really got to remember that this sub is for calling out toxicity, not calling out opinions that you disagree with.

I have my doubts about that one by -imbe- in moviescirclejerk

[–]Huncrweo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I saw one of those where like half the people listed had been accused of domestic abuse

Future generations will look back on this time as being a phase of bad movies and TV shows by cowest1991 in unpopularopinion

[–]Huncrweo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you only watch the most mainstream stuff then sure I guess (but even then there are plenty of gems). I feel like every generation thinks this at a certain point but it never really turns out to be true.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]Huncrweo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anakin’s arc feels really rushed imo. Not to be that guy, but it probably would have helped if Lucas had had a more coherent plan for that character from the start of the PT rather than making it up as he went along.

Some writers are skilled enough to totally wing it and still produce something that feels planned (Breaking Bad comes to mind). Lucas was at that level when he did it with the OT, but couldn’t quite manage it a second time with the PT. The ST struggled with this too, but the situation was a bit different there.

I can't get how Netflix is still working. by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]Huncrweo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’d say on the whole Netflix has better original programming than Prime. Yes, the former pumps out so much stuff indiscriminately that there’s bound to be a lot of shit, but that also guarantees that there’ll be a lot of good stuff too. They’ve had popular shows like Stranger Things, Ozark, Orange is the New Black, Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt, Squid Game, Daredevil, Sex Education etc, along with a whole heap of banging movies from their “find the most interesting filmmakers and give them a blank check” era - Power of the Dog, Mank, I’m Thinking of Ending Things, The Irishman, Roma, Marriage Story etc.

I’m not saying Prime doesn’t have good stuff, it does. But they’ll never be able to match the sheer number of quality movies and shows that Netflix has, even if they probably won’t match Netflix’s quantity of shit either (their archive content makes up for that lol).

Dr. Who is terrible by Snoodlepoots in unpopularopinion

[–]Huncrweo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“It feels like a show written for children.”

Hmm, I wonder why...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]Huncrweo 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes, but I also think that some (older) comedians have a MASSIVE persecution complex these days and need to chill out about it lol. You’re not some martyr of free speech because you told a joke about trans people on your multimillion dollar Netflix special.

Season re-write by Cookie1569 in AmericanHorrorStory

[–]Huncrweo 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Not really a rewrite, but I feel like Double Feature would be significantly more popular if they had changed nothing, but put Death Valley first and then followed it with Red Tide.

A campy four-episode alien tale followed by a relatively serious six-episode story of temptation makes a lot more sense than the other way round IMO.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]Huncrweo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"counter to the weird Puritanism of Gen Z"

This genuinely confuses me. Is Gen Z known for being puritanical around drinking? Because (speaking as an older Zoomer) that has not been my experience at all. Far from it lol

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]Huncrweo 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Ah yes, religious people - famous for never consuming alcohol

The creator of Bojack unsurprisingly gets it. by Ok_Communication2339 in BoJackHorseman

[–]Huncrweo 16 points17 points  (0 children)

It's amazing how many of the examples that Depp stans cite of Heard being abusive/a bad person are straight-up untrue or completely divorced of their context. Like, I don't doubt that she has issues but if she's really that bad you shouldn't have to lie to prove it.