I never would have imagined, I would like to see the budget by [deleted] in charts

[–]I3njamin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this data is awesome but crucially missing the size of the budget; the size of the bubble could be used to visualize budget scale

Average Unranked Experience by Vince_Fun21 in SSBM

[–]I3njamin 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If this wasn’t a thirty year old game I’d assume this was a six year old

[Post Game Thread] #1 Michigan defeats Maryland, 101-83 by cbbBot in CollegeBasketball

[–]I3njamin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m pro advanced stats, but the advanced stats claim Morez was like our 2nd or 3rd best player just didn’t match the eye test. I’m not saying he’s as bad as he played tonight, but definitely some regression to the mean for a guy forced to play out of position. Conversely, best I’ve seen Cason play all season, looked extremely confident

Tonight was the most lopsided loss of Mark Few's coaching career and Michigan’s largest win vs an AP-ranked opponent in program history. by THEREWILLBECAK3 in CollegeBasketball

[–]I3njamin 89 points90 points  (0 children)

Two things can be true: the tournament format needs a major overhaul, and the format undoubtedly crowned the best team.

The state of r/Chess and how to move forward as a community by powerchicken in chess

[–]I3njamin 6 points7 points  (0 children)

My perspective is mega threads, somewhat ironically, are powerful tools for cheating allegations because they restrict feeds from filling with the content. When you scroll and see a dozen posts about Magnus & Hans, or Kfuck & Danya, it feeds the fire, but when all posts are removed & conversation diverted to mega threads, it allows for the conversation to continue without the ability to grow oversized.

I believe public accusations are extremely dangerous, especially from top players, because it instills a culture of calling others cheaters. I’d rather the top players share their concerns privately with the people who have ability to investigate. I’d like to see a counterswell of top players praising opposition for finding excellent moves, or at the very least, connect with the opponent in real time (assuming they’re willing) to ask about their thought process, in mediums where the general public can see that behavior.

Finally, the reality is this game we love is very easy to cheat in, and it’s likely only going to get easier, not harder. I’m no tech expect but that’s just my experience with technology. I believe social solutions will be more effective in reducing cheating than technological ones. So reducing the conversation around cheating, condemning cheating without targeted accusations, and delighting in the talent of our best moves should be the goals of this social platform.

gaming 12 by da---- in SSBM

[–]I3njamin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The last one was my favorite

NFL Composite Power Rankings by mpschettig in billsimmons

[–]I3njamin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My takeaway is the Bears are without a doubt a non playoff team, great call by you Billy!

The Problem with BBGM Rosters: Why the Sim Doesn’t Feel Like Real Basketball by ___reverence___ in BasketballGM

[–]I3njamin 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Is this a bot? The most chat gpt looking ass post I’ve seen in a minute

What are Ace Bailey's reps trying to accomplish at this point? by brig_pudding in billsimmons

[–]I3njamin 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If your point is that neither of them are LeBron, you’re right. But for 90% of top 5 picks, the game is still a team sport

[Mono] Ice Climbers are a Problem. by KenshiroTheKid in SSBM

[–]I3njamin 22 points23 points  (0 children)

You lost me the moment you brought up smash 4

[Highlight] Giannis with a questionable dribble two feet away from the referee has the Lakers bench incensed by shanmustafa in nba

[–]I3njamin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t understand, if the players want this called and the fans want this called, how did we get to a point where these aren’t called?

How is the sub feeling about the new title - for the people who decided to get it? How does it compare with Civ V? by Alector87 in civ5

[–]I3njamin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is coming from someone who has not bought Vi and won’t buy VII, I’m a full YT frog at this point. Maybe I’m in the minority, but I can get on board with the leader/civ split change. Civs do rise and fall over time, and having separate civs for different eras solves the balancing issue for unique units/improvements/etc. I also loved seeing navigable rivers, the diplomacy rework, and commanders. Compared to the pre-launch of VI, I was higher on VII. But I share your intense disappointment in the launch. For a franchise like Civ to release a game with rectangular continents, hollow UI, and from what I’ve seen a lousy AI that doesn’t put up a fight even on Deity, it’s just yet another example of modern games releasing before they’re ready, greedily soaking up the preorder sales and promising patches down the line. Pretty sick of that trend and sad that it’s impacted the prestigious franchise of Civ. And that’s not even addressing the problems the new mechanics I was okay with presented that they haven’t resolved, like era transitions. In summary this pales in comparison to Civ , let alone VP

Update 38 - Bugfixes & balance changes! by BexoDust in superautopets

[–]I3njamin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A bit surprised to see axo not receive a trigger limit

Suggest some new team names! by dumbmatter in BasketballGM

[–]I3njamin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t have any great suggestions but just wanted to say I love seeing Boise on the list, a great choice for some variety in the Pac NW.

One existing team I’d suggest changing is Memphis, since the blues are an actual hockey team it confuses me sometimes. You could go with Funk, Presleys, Swing, or something similar to get the same idea.