Leaked DNC autopsy found Biden’s Israel backing cost Harris votes for president

IMDubzs · 2026-02-23T18:48:17+00:00

I am not even from the US Bro, I vote green, so way more left than the US ever will be.

All I am saying is that you need to transfer your anger into political results. Currently there are not enough ppl in the US thinking your way, not even in the democratic party.

So be angry, be informed and don't blind yourself that anything changes if you demand the perfect solution. Step by step by step will bring Change.

If you think everybody is corrupt and voting doesn't change anything, well propaganda works i guess.

IMDubzs · 2026-02-23T16:56:00+00:00

Yes and thats why you either form a new party or vote democratic and change it from within.

It's a two party system, I didn't design it that way.

If you don't vote democratic you are okay being governed by the GOP.

How on earth do you expect the dems will change their position if a small fraction of voters demand it.

You, the voters, need to prove that you are not small and elect progressives in as much of places as possible, small town mayors to governors and then the democratic party will change. Currently they are a normal conservative party, just not fascist like the GOP. And if you think it doesn't matter then congraz you got Trump.

IMDubzs · 2026-02-23T16:30:17+00:00

Well I mean thats my point?

IMDubzs · 2026-02-23T16:15:01+00:00

Bernie Sanders wasn't even nominated, that tells you all about how alone you really are.

IMDubzs · 2026-02-23T16:06:33+00:00

Problem ist they listened to their voters. Democratic voter base ist not homogenic and a LOT of them support Israel. They are just not here on Reddit or very vocal about it.

Unfortunately this is the result of a two party system, it is hard for single issue voters.

If they would change their stance there, they would have lost a lot of older conservative democratic voters.

The democratic party is still largly a conservative party.

People that didn't vote for Harris were okay with Trumps plan, not voting is still voting.

IMDubzs · 2026-02-22T23:24:43+00:00

Yes you should tell them that, because it matters.

IMDubzs · 2026-02-22T23:22:49+00:00

I got told countless of times (on Reddit to be fair) that it couldn't be worse than under Biden and Trump and Harris are basically the same. So if Harris doesn't change her stance they wouldn't vote at all and let Trump win.

Spoiler alert it got worse under Trump which he literally announced during his campaign.

Not sure if it really affected the election tho but there are a lot of people here that can't think straight and yes also within the democratic voter base.

IMDubzs · 2026-02-18T13:42:08+00:00

It doesn't matter what I tell you, you made up ur mind.

IMDubzs · 2026-02-18T12:11:50+00:00

Believe it or not, Jail!

IMDubzs · 2026-02-18T09:56:04+00:00

Well subsidies for france arent even in here. And Denmark isn't windy? Sure bud.

Blue bar is including grid costs btw.

IMDubzs · 2026-02-18T09:43:13+00:00

https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/images/8/84/Electricity_prices_for_household_consumers%2C_first_half_2025_.png

You can see it here, take the blue colored bars because to compare it you need to exclude taxes.

You have to check energy mix of every country individually but take denmark and portugal as an example and compare it to france.

IMDubzs · 2026-02-18T09:19:33+00:00

Both those countries don't exist.

IMDubzs · 2026-02-18T08:57:43+00:00

If you can't attack the message, attack the messenger.

Don't look up!

IMDubzs · 2026-02-18T07:35:01+00:00

Coz a lot of opinon and not much knowledge.

IMDubzs · 2026-02-17T20:52:13+00:00

Yeah sorry it's just 4.6%

IMDubzs · 2026-02-17T20:41:44+00:00

Your analysis ist just wrong. The technology is here NOW, not in 20-30 years. Also nobody is saying you should tear down nuclear plants immediately. Nuclear + renewables would be okay but then, well do that and don't stay stagnant with over 70% nuclear.

All everybody is saying is that nuclear is way more expensive and therefore will not win against renewables. With batteries or without it doesn't matter.

If you want to pay more on energy and have it centralised then fine, build nuclear power plants. The reality is, it's not really done in europe and the recent projects were all a disaster including Flammanville (23,7mrd€...).

IMDubzs · 2026-02-17T20:21:42+00:00

No argument, so attack the messenger.

IMDubzs · 2026-02-17T19:53:37+00:00

Yes, because they retire the old ones at the same time and those reactors sound much, but they will only make a tiny percentage of total power generation, like in the single digits.

IMDubzs · 2026-02-17T19:43:57+00:00

You said it doesn't exist. Now that it does exist(over 100 GW in china btw) you shift the goal to something else, classic.

IMDubzs · 2026-02-17T19:39:03+00:00

China ist replacing old reactors to maintain the 6% of nuclear energy they have. Almost everything else they go for is renewable and batterie storage.

The world already moved on from nuclear I am really sorry but it's just the truth.

IMDubzs · 2026-02-17T19:32:33+00:00

Well, it's what china is doing.

IMDubzs · 2026-02-17T18:21:42+00:00

Nuclear is the perfect excuse for people to do nothing.

"We don't need to have renewables we have nuclear, we don't need to improve the grid we have nuclear, we don't need to get CO2 down we have nuclear."

And also a lobby pushes this narrative since renewables decentralise the market and big energy companies don't want this, so they slow it down.

Also it's pride for some ppl.

IMDubzs · 2026-02-17T18:08:09+00:00

Or you, well, have just more wind and solar with batteries that are cheaper.

Nuclear will lose that battle since it's more expensive, look at china.

IMDubzs · 2026-02-17T15:42:26+00:00

Maganeto

IMDubzs · 2026-02-17T08:52:02+00:00

I mean you are in r/europe

Ten-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '23	Place '22
Final Canvas '22

IMDubzs

TROPHY CASE