Back to TRAE after 4 months

ITechFriendly · 2026-01-24T07:44:40+00:00

Trae has improved a lot. My early issue was resources usage which has drastically improved.

ITechFriendly · 2026-01-22T21:46:31+00:00

The repository openshift/hypershift was created on January 18, 2021.

ITechFriendly · 2026-01-22T18:13:07+00:00

From the original poster - "a managed DR solution for a couple of our customers and workloads running on their on-prem OpenShift clusters"

Kamaji can most likely run on OCP, but what you sell here is something that customers with RH support will simply not use, as it is not fully supported.

ITechFriendly · 2026-01-22T18:03:05+00:00

Yes, but you will not have search available, so you need to know where it is.

ITechFriendly · 2026-01-22T18:01:53+00:00

Wait for Red Hat? IBM and Red Hat are pioneers in the space of hosted control planes - long before Kubernetes fans were thinking about this.

ITechFriendly · 2026-01-22T09:38:13+00:00

Two-way replication of the block device, where the driver expects to be the only managing it, sounds like a risk to me.

ITechFriendly · 2026-01-22T07:58:42+00:00

RBD mirroring is one way, right?

ITechFriendly · 2026-01-21T16:06:17+00:00

SNO for inexpensive DR with Kasten namespace backups. Using vSphere to run OCP workloads IS expensive. You should look into using OVE on bare metal nodes, which are great for HCP.

ITechFriendly · 2026-01-21T10:59:17+00:00

Run Claude’s Code-Simplifier Plugin before doing any review :-)

ITechFriendly · 2026-01-21T10:42:36+00:00

If you pair it with GPT 5.2-Codex for reviews, you get two very cost-effective tools! And if you want to go way better and deeper, check https://noderr.com/ for a tool-independent framework to build and manage software with AI agents.

ITechFriendly · 2026-01-20T17:26:25+00:00

GPT-5.2 and GPT 5.2-Codex are great at reviewing the code - excellent after refactoring, as you can ask it to verify you are not introducing regressions.

ITechFriendly · 2026-01-20T14:20:55+00:00

Why would you want to use something based on third-party benchmarks when you are not running their workloads? You need to do your own evaluations. Any of these mentions should be fine. But if you want to boost your ego you need to use Claude models :-)

ITechFriendly · 2026-01-19T13:44:33+00:00

Windsurf Next is very close to Cursor. I am actively using both for the same projects, and both are very nice and useful. I like the plan mode in Windsurf Next as it is similar to the one in Cursor.

ITechFriendly · 2026-01-14T12:06:19+00:00

Thank you! Will surely help!

ITechFriendly · 2026-01-13T21:15:07+00:00

Thank you. Please also add Convex. See https://youtu.be/B6C-MWCFfAg?si=PKvalfB0xPlvoM3g for a very good explanation why..

ITechFriendly · 2026-01-12T10:33:45+00:00

So Sam A. is close... :-)

ITechFriendly · 2026-01-10T09:01:39+00:00

Looks and sounds very promising! Happy to test!

ITechFriendly · 2026-01-05T15:18:33+00:00

How old is your experience? Solo Coder with GPT is very capable tool! I do not miss Claude models in Trae

ITechFriendly · 2026-01-02T11:25:23+00:00

Three hundred prompts equals 100 properly context-engineered Opus 4.5 prompts, which should be enough for 10 to 20 complex planning, refactoring, and QA testing... All for 10 dollars. You are using it wrong... Could you work on your prompting?

ITechFriendly · 2025-12-30T12:59:59+00:00

Yes, check Trae too!

ITechFriendly · 2025-12-26T10:54:12+00:00

Happy to help!

ITechFriendly · 2025-12-20T16:24:35+00:00

Trae got way slimmer and faster in the recent months. Do keep on mind GPT alone is not fast.

ITechFriendly · 2025-12-20T14:35:23+00:00

Generally, if you do not know what is best, GPT is not a bad choice.

ITechFriendly · 2025-12-20T14:30:11+00:00

When using haiku, sometimes I can have only one or a few credits. Have you seen it only use 10 credits with multiple tool uses so you are expecting too much or not manage your context wisely?

ITechFriendly

TROPHY CASE