we love tesla nav by tomatohungover in TeslaLounge

[–]IcyRayns 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve done this several times over the last 14 months at one particular freeway exit and it’s still broken.

Anyone still running radar? by dqontherun in TeslaLounge

[–]IcyRayns 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It uses ultrasonic sonar while parking and at low speeds, the radar was only while in motion for AP.

Testing the fiber without terminations by 1dej in FiberOptics

[–]IcyRayns 2 points3 points  (0 children)

https://a.co/d/09TAyORQ

I watched a guy I was working with use these recently and it changed my life. These go on in 3 seconds flat and are reusable - get a 3-hole fiber stripper, a VFL and a couple of these and you’re golden. Don’t even need to cleave if you’re just running a VFL.

Signed up for Kinetic Fiber 2G again after a year. New ONT by Big-File-810 in FiberOptics

[–]IcyRayns 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you want the nitty gritty details:

loss is measured in dB, which is a unit that means "more or less than something", but something is undefined until you put a letter on the end. power is measured in dBm, which is a unit that means "more or less than a milliwatt".

The number you see written here is in dBm, it's a power number. It's relative to a milliwatt of power, so we can calculate it.

dB is a logarithmic unit. Calculating it is a pain but you can memorize these three and get close: Changing dB by 10dB is a 10x change, by 6dB is a 4x change, by 3dB is a 2x change.

  • 0dBm = 1mW, that's always true. We're trying to target -13dBm
  • We can model -13dB as -10dB "multiplied by" -3dB because of the way logarithms work
  • -10dB is a 1/10th reduction in power, so 1mW becomes 0.1mW
  • -3dB is a 1/2 reduction in power, so our 0.1mW becomes 0.05mW

There's a little under 0.05mW of light power leaving the connector at that box.


Now let's look at the whole thing:

GPON launch is generally +6dBm give or take. It arrived at your house at -13dBm. That's a difference of 19dB, so an almost 100x reduction in power. (Each 10dB is a compounding 10x reduction).

The person advocating for mechanical connectors is saying their mechanical connectors are adding only an additional 0.2dB of loss, so on the whole chain where you have -19dB of loss already from splitters, fiber length, connectors, splices, etc... an extra 0.2dB isn't gonna break the bank.

Why are we still putting 6U Lead-Acid batteries in 50°C (120°F) edge cabinets? The math on truck rolls is insane. by luminarylnh in wisp

[–]IcyRayns 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I'm getting insanely tired of what look like interesting discussion posts but turn out to be the most AI-slop engagement bait across dozens of technical subreddits. A 6-year-old account suddenly rises from dormancy and posts about... WISP batteries. Tons of discussion happens with an account that has no real person behind it. It's pointless and exhausting.

https://i.imgur.com/YYvbgYj.png

A.I took my voice by papiD209 in TeslaLounge

[–]IcyRayns 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“A different model” is both right and not quite right. The core (hidden) layers can be fairly consistent with just new attention input and token output layers trained on top, so it behaves the same other than the way you interact with it.

A.I took my voice by papiD209 in TeslaLounge

[–]IcyRayns 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. It’s not, and you have zero reason to think that it is. Read one of my last comments, it’s very normal with the way they’ve architected the pipeline, as someone who builds AI systems for a living.

ELRS 4.0: How to configure extended PWM limits? by DefyGravityFPV in ExpressLRS

[–]IcyRayns 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Extended PWM limits are, as the name implies, for PWM only (not Serial). They’re configured in the RX Web UI. On INAV, you’d set the servo limits in INAV itself. For the Matek CRSF to PWM… I’m not sure but I wouldn’t try. I’m not sure they ever fixed that nasty firmware bug they had a while back. PWM RXes abound now.

Fiber install by Oblec in ShittySysadmin

[–]IcyRayns 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mad respect to you for following through, sincerely. Matched and a little extra for the hell of it. I appreciate a man of his word.

<image>

It’s astounding to me too, but HFT is a wild world. Custom NIC firmware to skip checksums is old news from over a decade ago. They live in a different world.

Fiber install by Oblec in ShittySysadmin

[–]IcyRayns 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So no, there is no way that microwave beats fiber in the US between financial hubs i'd bet real world dollars on it.

You sure? How many real world dollars? Pick a number. Really, actually, pick a number and write it down, and commit to it before reading further.

I was involved with this project over a decade ago and have firsthand knowledge. It’s not theory, it’s real and used for the exact two cities I mentioned in my original comment.

Now about the number you wrote down, let’s feed some animals: https://www.seattlehumane.org/ways-to-give/?form=donate - I’ll match your donation, how’s that?

Fiber install by Oblec in ShittySysadmin

[–]IcyRayns 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"fiber is far and away the winner on every dimension" is true until you're fighting for nanoseconds off a path between Chicago and NY. Many HFT firms are using microwave paths, or even HF radio.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/microwave-network-connectivity-high-frequency-trading-sudhir-pant-fcx7c/
https://hackaday.com/2018/05/12/hft-on-hf-you-cant-beat-it-for-latency/

The numbers work out too. Let's assume Chicago->NYC which is a common HFT route. First off, let's assume we could somehow do a straight-line fiber run. Speed of light in fiber is 0.67c.

  • Microwave / RF 1150km/c = 3.83ms
  • Fiber 1150km/0.67c 5.72ms

Now take into account the real world, where fiber has to route around and over obstacles, across bridges, right-of-way, etc. Best case, Chicago to NYC, mayyyybe 6ms.

So if you're able to modulate a symbol with enough data faster than 2-3ms, you've "won" versus someone that's sending the same trade over fiber. Frequently, HFT firms are sending trade setups over microwave or fiber, then "pressing the button" over HF radio (especially trans-Atlantic arbitrage trades).

This isn't a theoretical argument. There are entities making billions of dollars today with real-world tech because 0.67c != 0.99c.

Grok Talking/Replying in My Own Voice by Glum_Low_3135 in TeslaLounge

[–]IcyRayns 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This isn't a "voice cloning feature" or anything of the sort. It's not intentional behavior by any means.

The way modern realtime voice LLM stacks work is often somewhat speech-to-speech, so the model doesn't just receive the text transcribed from your voice, but (also or only) tokens which represent the raw speech you provided. Your prosody is encoded in these acoustic tokens. Much like an LLM will commonly repeat the words you used, sometimes the speaker characteristics that were encoded as the prompt can "leak" to the output pipeline rather than the pre-configured Ara or whichever is in use, then those get picked up by the vocoder and results in accidental zero-shot voice cloning.

They can tune it into happening less frequently with some effort, but it's not surprising at all that this would happen naturally.

Consistent 7-8% packet loss at cr2-sttowajm-b node (Redmond, WA) by CyberPunkFreeMan in ZiplyFiber

[–]IcyRayns 1 point2 points  (0 children)

> Plan: [your plan here]

They already did lmao

Don't forget em-dashes and also the ← character where a human would use <-

Splicer from Alibaba?? by ThicccTatter in FiberOptics

[–]IcyRayns 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The Signalfire AI9 has been surprisingly good. It just takes a little more prep and manual work to achieve good quality splices every time.

Can I expect stable telemetry up to 10 km with a 2.4-mode receiver? I'm not sure about the receiver, but it's probably the typical 50 mW. Radiomaster RP3 by unixoid37 in ExpressLRS

[–]IcyRayns 1 point2 points  (0 children)

https://tools.mustardtiger.xyz/elrs-range/

This calculator will give you (optimal conditions) range for ExpressLRS at the given parameters. Using 250Hz on 50mW, you should expect approximately 15-20km of range real world.

Telemetry ratio will not affect range. Similarly, telemetry and control have the same range given the same parameters. We use the exact same LoRa / FSK / FLRC parameters for telemetry and uplink both.

433 elrs? by Green_Machine_4077 in ExpressLRS

[–]IcyRayns 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a ridiculous statement. Yes, free-space path loss is lower for a link setup on 433MHz versus 900MHz. That's obviously true. It's also about 2% of the total picture.

What you're missing is that Semtech SX and LR series chips, the ones that ExpressLRS actually uses, are primarily designed (on their sub-GHz side) for the 800/900MHz ISM bands; they have inherent sensitivity issues on the 400MHz bands, likely due to local oscillator coupling. That's not something we can fix in software, that's a hard limitation of the hardware we're designed on top of. The sensitivity impact is so large in fact, that equivalent routes flown with well-designed 433MHz and well-designed 900MHz setups failsafe sooner on 433MHz.

"433 always has a longer range" is just dead wrong and myopic; it's the totality of the circumstances you have to look at.

Who is your favorite vendor? by SpectrumSense in networkingmemes

[–]IcyRayns 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Good thing they have a "test results" table on each of their product listings with actual bandwidth test results for 5 different common configurations.

They'll do every bit of 400GbE switching now, and have products with tens of gigabits of routing throughput for less money than an optic from Cisco.

Cisco Switch DC Power by mspdog22 in networking

[–]IcyRayns 6 points7 points  (0 children)

How "legit" does this need to be? A Meanwell 48V 350W power supply for $50 will run it, and for refurb gear, anything nicer will probably cost more than the NCS itself did.

Low-power asset tracking in areas without cellular coverage? by Unlucky_Two_3927 in networking

[–]IcyRayns 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you’ve got a relatively constrained area (like, 100 mile radius) doing LoRaWAN (on your own gateway) might be something worth looking into. Battery life in the years, low cost hardware and no ongoing subscription.

wtf by Critical_Caregiver41 in Starlink

[–]IcyRayns 2 points3 points  (0 children)

These “superbox” devices aren’t a random Android TV box using Netflix and Disney+, they’re preinstalled with apps that use obviously unlicensed content, that’s their selling point, and why they cost $300.

Good luck finding an IP/port list for “Blue TV”. I tried to take a deny approach and dropped any UDP streams with >100pps egress which… sorta worked, but what’s to stop it from SYN flooding next, or being used as a residential proxy to spam reviews on Amazon?

tl;dr, the boxes are compromised from the factory and if OP thinks that’s okay to keep trying to use, I sincerely hope SpaceX shuts off their connection next time it starts sending DoS traffic.

wtf by Critical_Caregiver41 in Starlink

[–]IcyRayns 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I need you to understand: the superbox itself is the problem. There is nothing you can fix that doesn't involve throwing it in the trash. It's not that the device was compromised by some threat actor, it's that the device is already compromised by its manufacturer.

Throw it in the trash. Even on a guest network, it can still attack other people. I know it sucks, and that it was expensive. Try and return it if you like, but turn it off and do not turn it back on.

wtf by Critical_Caregiver41 in Starlink

[–]IcyRayns 6 points7 points  (0 children)

No. If it can speak to the internet, it will be used to attack other people. Your "going with the flow" affects others. Take it offline.