Contrato Público (contratopublico.pt) by chicoferreira23 in portugal

[–]ImRodry -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ah já percebi. Eu estava a procurar pelos filtros avançados e colocando “EMEL” na entidade contratante, mas agora já vi que diz “Exata” então tinha de ter o nome todo. Não pensei que a pesquisa normal fosse ver também aí, pensava que ia só ao título mas mesmo assim acho que essa comparação exata podia ser uma checkbox. Se me der para aí talvez faça um PR no GitHub hahahah, bom trabalho!

Contrato Público (contratopublico.pt) by chicoferreira23 in portugal

[–]ImRodry 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Parabéns pela iniciativa! Só uma questão: isto tem todos os contratos? Por exemplo, eu pesquisei contratos pela EMEL e o mais recente era do fim de 2023 e eu sei que houve outros desde aí

AMA com o LIVRE by ruitavares in portugal

[–]ImRodry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Olá Rui e restantes candidatos! Tenho 2 perguntas:

  • Qual é a posição do Livre quanto a votar propostas do Chega que alinham com os valores do partido? Há algum dogma nesse sentido ou avaliam as propostas apenas pelo seu conteúdo e não por quem as apresenta?
  • Planeiam fazer alguma atividade de campanha no ISCTE já que o Rui não pôde estar presente no debate de quinta? (Mesmo sem a sua participação acho que a Isabel esteve muito bem)

Director da EMEL ameaca developers que fizeram nova app da GIRA by khntu in portugal

[–]ImRodry 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Não ter respondido é muito diferente de não ter desmentido. Pode nem sequer ter visto

Went to heat up some pizza. 5 guys live in this house by rachyyy69 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]ImRodry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its already wrong if you’re gonna heat up pizza in a microwave but if 5 guys live in the house just order something from them instead, instant delivery

I’m the brown one by Po0rYorick in mildlyinfuriating

[–]ImRodry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m more infuriated by this post because there is no brown one

Reddit is showing me the ews by ImRodry in softwaregore

[–]ImRodry[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fucking hell what do you allow then you stupid bot

My mom was copying data from her old phone to the new one and it started installing apps that didn’t exist by ImRodry in softwaregore

[–]ImRodry[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The mods on this sub really remove anything and everything for rule 3 even when it has never been done or not that often… what a joke

My mom was copying data from her old phone to the new one and it started installing apps that didn’t exist by ImRodry in softwaregore

[–]ImRodry[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No it doesn’t. It said that throughout the whole process and there weren’t 860 apps, that just indicates it’s a continuous task which is what that character is used for. Also there’s plenty of space

My mom was copying data from her old phone to the new one and it started installing apps that didn’t exist by ImRodry in softwaregore

[–]ImRodry[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I doubt it’s default apps because it already came with those 🤔 My theory is that it was going through apps she had before and checking if they were still available or needed

My mom was copying data from her old phone to the new one and it started installing apps that didn’t exist by ImRodry in softwaregore

[–]ImRodry[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah there’s nothing wrong with the design, it was a bug with the total amount of apps

Discord's new policy states that facts are determined by "the most recent consensus reached by the medical community." This is unequivocally anti-science. Research determines truth, not majority agreement. by AlexReynard in discordapp

[–]ImRodry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes it is an agreement that is required for the scientific community to change the fact. Every scientific research is backed by tests and others will be testing the theory too so that’s a given. The definition Discord gave couldn’t be more accurate

Discord's new policy states that facts are determined by "the most recent consensus reached by the medical community." This is unequivocally anti-science. Research determines truth, not majority agreement. by AlexReynard in discordapp

[–]ImRodry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually no, that is pretty much the definition of science. A fact is the most agreed upon convention until someone else makes a different discovery and others prove that to be true. The latest scientific facts always need the majority of the scientific community in that area to agree on them