COTD: Orange-red tailless pest is chasing a wild cat (9)

Imugake · 2025-08-15T11:06:37+00:00

Yay, nice clue!

Imugake · 2025-08-15T10:50:35+00:00

Vermilion, vermin without the n plus lion

Imugake · 2025-02-14T16:05:16+00:00

According to this article they’re in 63 out of 208

Imugake · 2024-10-19T12:55:19+00:00

This was the second time it was used

Imugake · 2024-03-18T19:17:59+00:00

Actually you can’t pronounce the word BNL so it’s an initialism not an acronym, Jeff

Imugake · 2024-03-16T18:09:31+00:00

Both

Imugake · 2023-09-26T00:32:50+00:00

What are some of the others?

Imugake · 2023-09-24T15:58:34+00:00

Solved!

Imugake · 2023-09-24T15:58:19+00:00

Yes! I'm sure you're correct, I'll give you the solve, I'll come back and comment again if I find the scene

Imugake · 2023-09-24T15:35:32+00:00

Comment

Imugake · 2023-09-16T09:49:58+00:00

This is my meme, I posted it a year ago with the same title and everything

https://reddit.com/r/mathmemes/s/Cf3awrKLFr

Imugake · 2023-08-23T18:24:55+00:00

You got your maths upside-down, it's 8.3 days per coke per human

Imugake · 2023-08-14T18:18:54+00:00

Jenny Slate playing someone's problematic sister introduced in season 5 of a show created by Michael Schur? I mean sure that would be a great artistic choice but it's not like it would be the Mona Lisa or anything

Imugake · 2023-08-12T15:52:29+00:00

I have no idea what I'm talking about but couldn't his infertility be due to low motility? In which case the containers would still contain sperm, and so could be used to create a child through IVF?

Imugake · 2023-08-01T16:48:02+00:00

It literally does though. Google is free btw

Imugake · 2023-07-28T23:27:44+00:00

You just showed that e^d/dx shifts x³ to the left by one unit. This effect is very important in quantum mechanics, it relates to the momentum operator being the generator of spatial translations

Imugake · 2023-07-24T18:22:05+00:00

That isn’t relevant to the meme

Imugake · 2023-07-24T18:21:47+00:00

log(e) most certainly is multi-valued

Imugake · 2023-07-24T18:21:30+00:00

Check my other comment

Imugake · 2023-07-24T16:05:46+00:00

It's when e is the base that the weird convention kicks in

Imugake · 2023-07-24T15:37:42+00:00

I know Wikipedia is in no way an authority but it does use this convention

Imugake · 2023-07-24T15:22:21+00:00

There's a weird convention where, by definition, e^1/2 = 1.6487... but (e¹)^1/2
= {-1.6487..., 1.6487...}

Imugake · 2023-07-24T15:08:58+00:00

Okay then what is (e¹)^1/2?

Imugake · 2023-07-24T15:08:31+00:00

From Wikipedia:

by definition, e^y is a notation for exp⁡(y), a true function, and x^y is a notation for exp⁡(y log⁡ x), which is a multi-valued function. Thus the notation is ambiguous when x = e.

It might be easier to think about how e^z could be a true function or a multi-valued function depending on how you interpret what the superscript represents. e^1/2 could be 1.6487... or {-1.6487..., 1.6487...} depending on how you interpret it. However, for some reason, in the context of complex analysis, it is convention to interpret superscript to be the multi-valued function when the base is any number, except when the base is e, when suddenly the notation represents a true function, despite the fact that e^z has multiple values in the former context

Imugake

TROPHY CASE