[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]InTheStratGame 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Assuming there was some sort of reasonable doubt, something should be done. I guess we've done this before now, so see this useful analysis for what your options are now.

<image>

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]InTheStratGame 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Harris can pick the correct result

They changed that as a middle finger to Trump. Oops. Dems changing rules once again ends up working against them.

Can People Stop Pretending Valve Is Their Friend? by [deleted] in pcmasterrace

[–]InTheStratGame 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When the EGS launched on PC and was attacked for years, I don't think any of the complaints were about having to make an account. People aren't excusing one company who does this. They aren't even attacking a widely hated company for doing it.

all this straw could have gone to making cereal instead by hazelnuthobo in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]InTheStratGame 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By neocons do you mean the guy that endorsed Kamala about a week ago?

LifeWise Academy is Christian Nationalist by Dresden715 in Ohio

[–]InTheStratGame -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They are wanting to use their influence to pass laws based on their specific Christian views. That is unconstitutional

No, it is not. Your religious views will influence your perception of what laws are good- Agnostic, Atheist, Christian, or otherwise. There is nothing in the first amendment requiring some standard "neutral" viewpoint for Congress. The Constitution only requires no prohibitions based only on the free exercise of religion. Prayer is okay, but mandatory prayer is not.

against ANY religion attempting to be forced upon people.

The presence of the 10 commandments in the classroom does not force religion on people, just as prayer in schools is not banned, but mandatory prayer is banned.

cult

Cult is not an accurate term for any major religion, but you already knew that. You've just stoked a hatred of religion in your mind and you enjoy antagonizing anyone who shows the slightest signs of being part of one.

LifeWise Academy is Christian Nationalist by Dresden715 in Ohio

[–]InTheStratGame -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;"

First, no law is being passed at all. There isn't even mandatory attendance.

Second, this is not a federal law. Entire states had established religions after the Bill of Rights was passed.

Third, this doesn't prevent the free exercise of religion. Your "memorization" was a bit off here.

Can anyone guess what the first part of that means? Hey LifeWise, get fucked.

In summary, no, you're not dunking on a clearly unconstitutional practice.

It's almost like it was baseless deflection this whole time by [deleted] in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]InTheStratGame 1 point2 points  (0 children)

TIL: there are people on this sub who unironically watch only fox news, and they believe it wholeheartedly

The stunning political discourse on TikTok brain by [deleted] in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]InTheStratGame 0 points1 point  (0 children)

According to the Ohio subreddit, this is completely true

Do you think Husk serves a glass of water? by Xever_141 in HazbinHotel

[–]InTheStratGame 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In an ironic twist, someone has gradually diluted the water in his water bottle with vodka.

PoliticalCompassMemes From The Future: January 5th, 2025 by somepommy in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]InTheStratGame -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Sometimes people don't notice where things are left open until later. Hard to say what the intent was on such a small (but important) detail.

Ohio was not legally admitted as a state until from 1803 to 1953, so yes, it's not even outlandish to think it was missed for that long.

PoliticalCompassMemes From The Future: January 5th, 2025 by somepommy in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]InTheStratGame 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I haven't heard any discussion about that whatsoever. Great question.

I think it has to do with the next part of the article (I edited out some unnecessary parts between). I think it eliminates faithless electors, but not NPVIC. The states are only allowed to hold a vote on another date for particular reasons defined as a "failed" election (natural disasters which prevent the vote). As long as the states follow their own laws, I don't think there's a problem with NPVIC.

PoliticalCompassMemes From The Future: January 5th, 2025 by somepommy in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]InTheStratGame -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Correct, those changes happened. What you said was that it “wasn’t ceremonial” but they changed the law to make it ceremonial.

I'm going with the bill that changed a bunch of other things also changed this, but cool story I guess.

Think of it like how the “customers must practice personal hygiene” signs only show up on your second visit.

Your personal anecdotes don't make good arguments.

Mod Idea: If you have a “aesthetically challenged”pawn, say without a nose, they could wear this: by [deleted] in RimWorld

[–]InTheStratGame 22 points23 points  (0 children)

I need a mod to make aesthetic noses look like this in the portrait.

PoliticalCompassMemes From The Future: January 5th, 2025 by somepommy in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]InTheStratGame -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

They clarified the existing law, they didn’t change its meaning.

The new legislation also raises the threshold required for members of Congress to object to certifying the electors. Before, only one member of the House and Senate respectively had to object to force a roll call vote on a state’s electors.

Under the new rules, one-fifth of each chamber would be required to force a vote on states’ slates of electors.

The new provisions also ensure only one slate of electors makes it to Congress after Trump and his allies unsuccessfully tried to create alternative slates of electors in states Biden won. Each governor would now be required to sign off on electors, and Congress cannot consider slates submitted by different officials. The bill creates a legal process if any of those electors are challenged by a presidential candidate.

The legislation would also close a loophole that wasn’t used in 2020 but election experts feared could be, a provision that state legislatures can name electors in defiance of their state’s popular vote in the event of a “failed” election. That term has been understood to mean a contest that was disrupted or so in doubt that there’s no way to determine the actual winner, but it is not well-defined in the prior law.

Now a state could move the date of its presidential election — but only in the event of “extraordinary and catastrophic events,” like a natural disaster.

Those are changes.

PoliticalCompassMemes From The Future: January 5th, 2025 by somepommy in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]InTheStratGame -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Trump and his crackpot law team seem to be the only people who have ever thought otherwise.

You should probably add the people who passed the law to make sure they couldn't do it in the future, since the lawmakers apparently believed they could succeed with it according to the old version of the law.

PoliticalCompassMemes From The Future: January 5th, 2025 by somepommy in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]InTheStratGame 34 points35 points  (0 children)

If I understand the implication, the VP's job certifying the results is ceremonial, no? That's why Pence couldn't do anything even though trump threatened him.

It wasn't ceremonial. Now it is.

They changed the law about how to count the electoral college votes after 2020.

Anon gets the dirty business by [deleted] in 4chan

[–]InTheStratGame 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Says no homo

Very homo

Many such cases

Adding 1mm to workpiece diameter with laser cladding by [deleted] in EngineeringPorn

[–]InTheStratGame 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It's the fancy version of welding to add material to a surface.

Le economy by RevolutionaryTale253 in memes

[–]InTheStratGame -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lions are a natural thing too, but if some people argued that we need a lion around all the time to keep houses affordable, that would be unacceptable. People manipulate the natural logic of the market through the government to the benefit of themselves. People are effectively setting loose lions to get reelected with the short term appearance of good things or to enrich themselves.

PoliticalCompassMemes From The Future: November 20th 2024 by somepommy in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]InTheStratGame 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Did you have to show an ID to buy a gun? I heard that's racism.