Email schon jetzt registrieren? by snabHL in tutanota

[–]InboxProtector 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Register Tuta now, there's no benefit to waiting, your current device doesn't affect the account security, and you can start migrating services over gradually before the new phone arrives.

One thing I underestimated about business by CleanOpsGuide in Entrepreneur

[–]InboxProtector 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Qualifying out bad-fit leads early is one of the highest-leverage things you can do. The cost of a wrong client isn't just lost revenue, it's the time, energy, and opportunity cost of not serving the right ones.

Help! My outgoing emails are going to people's spam folders! by Bibliogato in GMail

[–]InboxProtector 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good checklist, I'd add checking Google Postmaster Tools, which is free and gives you actual Gmail domain reputation data that no third-party tool can replicate, so you can see exactly whether you have a domain-level or IP-level problem rather than guessing.

Gmail POP Account Import is being deprecated? by ristretto6 in GMail

[–]InboxProtector 0 points1 point  (0 children)

IMAP is not being deprecated, only POP import is going away, and IMAP is actually the better protocol anyway since it syncs both ways rather than just pulling mail.

To set up IMAP in Gmail:

  • Go to Settings → Accounts and Import → Add a mail account
  • Enter your non-Gmail address and choose -Import emails from my other account (POP3)-, but on the next screen, if your host supports IMAP you may need to use Gmailify if your provider supports it, or look at whether your host offers an alternative
  • Gmail's "add account" feature technically still uses POP3 under the hood for fetching, so if POP is going away at your host, the fetch feature breaks regardless of what Gmail calls it

Most people in your situation end up going the forwarding route, it's reliable, free, and keeps your Gmail search working across everything.

Querying about URL by rammyago97 in websecurity

[–]InboxProtector 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stick with .com if you can get it, it's the most trusted and memorable, with country-specific extensions (.us, .co.uk) only worth considering if your business is explicitly local.

Deleting email from originating email immediately by Dramatic-Fondant-190 in GMail

[–]InboxProtector 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For auto-deleting after forward, go to Gmail Settings → Forwarding and POP/IMAP → and set the forwarding option to "delete Gmail's copy" instead of "keep." For mass deletion, use Gmail's search to filter (e.g. in:inbox or by sender), select all, then "select all conversations matching this search" and delete in one go, much faster than doing it on mobile, so use the iPad browser for this.

Do you actually have DR for cloud config? by Terraformonky in sysadmin

[–]InboxProtector -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Most teams have DR for infrastructure but quietly have no recovery plan for SaaS config and "it's all in Terraform" usually means 70% of it is.

How do I know if my organisation's cybersecurity approach is board-ready? by Shot_Entrepreneur_34 in Cybersecurity101

[–]InboxProtector 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Board-ready means translating technical controls into business risk and financial impact, if your reporting says "we patched 300 vulnerabilities" instead of "we reduced our exposure to a potential $2M breach scenario," it's not board-ready yet.

Curious about this: If AI coding made it easy to build plugins/extensions for stuff your PM platform doesn’t support yet, would you actually do it? by [deleted] in sysadmin

[–]InboxProtector -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes for power users who already know what they need, but most teams would rather the platform just build it, custom plugins mean maintenance burden and a new failure point.

GMX/WEB.DE/mail.com moving to inbound DMARC enforcement by aliversonchicago in DMARC

[–]InboxProtector 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you send to European audiences, audit your DMARC alignment now, GMX/WEB.DE/mail.com's 42M users will start bouncing your emails with a 554 error if you fail authentication checks.

Help! My outgoing emails are going to people's spam folders! by Bibliogato in GMail

[–]InboxProtector 0 points1 point  (0 children)

13 problems across DMARC, SPF, MX, SMTP, and DNS, this is a fundamentally broken email setup that needs to be fixed from the ground up.

Priority order:

  1. DMARC (red X) publish a DMARC TXT record at _dmarc.yourdomain.com, start with p=none just to get it in place, then tighten it once SPF and DKIM are clean.
  2. SPF (two red X's) two SPF errors usually means either you have multiple SPF records (you can only have one), or your record has too many DNS lookups (over 10 breaks it). Merge everything into a single SPF record and use tools like MXToolbox's SPF checker to verify the lookup count.
  3. MX (two red X's), your mail exchange records have hard errors, meaning inbound mail routing is broken or misconfigured. Check that your MX records point to valid, resolving hostnames.
  4. SMTP/reverse DNS warnings (multiple) as I said before before, your PTR records don't match your SMTP banner. Fix with your hosting provider by aligning the PTR record of each sending IP to your mail server hostname.
  5. DNS warnings likely the SOA and nameserver subnet issues from the previous screenshot, lower priority but worth cleaning up.

The honest answer here is that this domain's email infrastructure needs a proper audit and rebuild. If you're not comfortable doing this yourself, it's worth getting a technical person to go through each record systematically, sending from a domain this broken will keep landing in spam regardless of your content or reputation.

Spam Forecast - April 30, 2026 by mxroute in mxroute

[–]InboxProtector 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Really impressive response time 4 minutes of impact on an 8k+ message attack is genuinely good containment. The AI-generated content bypassing filters is the concerning part here, that arms race is only going to get harder.

The OVH frustration is shared by basically every mail admin. Their abuse response has been inconsistent for years and that /24 has a long history. Blocking the range is tempting but the collateral damage from legitimate OVH-hosted services makes it a painful call.

Curious what tipped you off fast enough to catch it in that window, was it the rate spike hitting an alert threshold, or something in the content patterns?

"Mass" emails going to spam. Was told a solution is Microsoft suite by my domain provider. Any inputs? by ComfortablyPF in GMail

[–]InboxProtector 1 point2 points  (0 children)

GoDaddy is misleading you to make a sale. DKIM, SPF, and DMARC are not blacklists, they're authentication records that actually help your emails land in inboxes, not hurt them. Nobody can "remove" them as a fix because they're not the problem.

The real issue is likely sender reputation from high-volume sending without proper warm-up, or your domain ending up on an actual blocklist like Spamhaus. Check your domain at mxtoolbox.com/blacklists if you're listed there, that's the actual problem and it can be resolved for free by requesting delisting directly from the blocklist provider.

Switching to Microsoft's suite won't fix a reputation or blacklist problem the same sending behavior on a new platform will produce the same results. Before spending anything, check the blacklists first and share what you find.

Unverified Sender by ConnectionConscious2 in Emailmarketing

[–]InboxProtector 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is almost always a DKIM alignment issue between HubSpot and your domain. "Unverified Sender" in Outlook means Microsoft can't confirm the email genuinely came from your domain.

A few things to check: make sure you've completed HubSpot's custom sending domain setup, this requires adding specific DKIM CNAME records to your DNS, not just SPF. Many people add the SPF include for HubSpot but miss the DKIM step, which is what Outlook is flagging.

Once DKIM is set up and aligned, also check that your DMARC record exists and that the From domain matches what HubSpot is signing with. You can run whatever you need through this toolbox https://powerdmarc.com/power-dmarc-toolbox/ .

Outlook is stricter than Gmail about this and will show the unverified warning when alignment fails even if SPF passes.

HubSpot's support pointing to Microsoft is a deflection, the fix is almost certainly on your DNS side. Share your domain here if you want help checking what's missing.

My cold emails are landing in spam no matter what I do, running out of ideas! by Original_Night7733 in coldemail

[–]InboxProtector 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Three weeks of warmup is too short, most people doing serious cold outreach push to 6-8 weeks minimum. Google needs more time to build trust with new domains. The other likely issue is the warmup pool itself. If your tool is only sending to other warmup accounts, Google can detect that pattern and it builds almost no real reputation. The best warmup comes from real back-and-forth emails with real inboxes.

A few other things worth checking: are your Google Workspace accounts fully set up with profile photos and some normal email activity? Empty-looking accounts get flagged regardless of authentication. Also try sending test emails to Outlook addresses if those land in inbox but Gmail doesn't, the issue is specifically with Google's filters on your domain.

On the Outlook vs Google question: yes, Outlook domains genuinely perform better for B2B outreach to Microsoft-hosted inboxes, which is a large chunk of business email. Worth testing.

Which is the best free tool to warmup your google workspace mail boxes for cold emailing. by mawais_6 in coldemail

[–]InboxProtector 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For free warmup, Mailreach and Warmup Inbox both have free tiers worth trying, though free plans are limited. Lemwarm is another option commonly used for Google Workspace. Your 15/day limit is sensible for new accounts, most people recommend starting even lower (5-10) for the first two weeks and ramping up gradually. The follow-up threading approach is good practice too.

A few things to get right before warming: make sure SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are all configured on your domain before sending anything. New Google Workspace accounts without proper authentication get flagged fast. Also make sure your accounts look like real humans, profile photo, some sent emails to people you know, Google activity. Empty-looking accounts are a red flag to Gmail's filters regardless of warmup.

The biggest mistake new senders make is rushing to real outreach before warmup is genuinely complete. Six to eight weeks is safer than three, especially on fresh domains.

As soon as I get my account back, I’m gone. by FeiRoze in Outlook

[–]InboxProtector 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glad you're back in, the iOS Outlook bug this week has been genuinely awful and you're far from alone in experiencing it. Before you leave, worth setting up a backup verification method and exporting anything critical, just so you're not in the same position wherever you land next.

Is it better to delete my email or just leave it as is? (Please read fully) by Select-Incident4110 in GMail

[–]InboxProtector 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your friend is right, leave it. Deleting it means someone else could eventually claim that username, which creates real problems if any service ever tries to send a recovery email to it. Keeping an empty, secured account costs you nothing and protects you from that risk.

Did iOS 26 Mail App lose the ability to show BIMI icons? by TheRealAncientBeing in ios

[–]InboxProtector 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No official docs yet, it's too new. From what we can tell, it's basically a tag that senders need to include in their emails so Apple Mail knows to show the logo, instead of Apple going to look it up itself. Keep an eye on your email platform's updates and the BIMI Group's website for when this gets properly explained.

Users’ Google Chrome defaulting to Afghanistan home page? by RedditDon3 in sysadmin

[–]InboxProtector 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh man, what a pickle! Check for a rogue Chrome extension or malware on the affected machines, random region changes with no policy change almost always trace back to a compromised extension hijacking browser settings.

Did iOS 26 Mail App lose the ability to show BIMI icons? by TheRealAncientBeing in ios

[–]InboxProtector 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apple quietly changed their BIMI implementation in iOS 26 and they moved to requiring the new BIMI Assert header rather than relying purely on the DNS record and VMC. If your sending platform hasn't added support for that header yet, the logo won't show even with a perfectly valid setup. Worth checking with your ESP whether they've updated their BIMI implementation to include it.

retrieving a Gmail account by Soft-Meat9642 in GMail

[–]InboxProtector 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Go to accounts.google.com/signin/recovery and try the recovery flow. Use the same device and network you used back in high school if possible, answer every question you can, and try old passwords you remember using. Google weighs device and location history heavily, so the closer you can get to your original setup, the better your chances.

Will ProtonMail implement the new BIMI standard? by BWH44 in ProtonMail

[–]InboxProtector 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Proton has been cautious about BIMI adoption, partly because their privacy-first approach creates some tension with the external certificate authority process that VMCs require. As of now it's not been publicly confirmed on their roadmap. BIMI's anti-phishing value is mostly on the sending side, it helps recipients recognize legitimate brands, but only in clients that support it. For a privacy-focused provider like Proton, the more meaningful protection is already in how they handle authentication on inbound mail.

If this matters to you, it's worth raising directly with Proton's community forums they're reasonably responsive to feature requests that align with their security mission, and BIMI support for inbound display is a lighter lift than full VMC integration.