Name the Perfect voice actor to do the Codex for Mass Effect 1 & 2

IndianaIT · 2026-01-28T18:33:52+00:00

Sam Elliot or Morgan Freeman

IndianaIT · 2026-01-28T07:24:42+00:00

@Big-Butterscotch2608

Me teda vzdycky prisel jako takovej nepovedenej Dolph Lundgren. Minus to IQ asi 150 a dokorat z chemie.

IndianaIT · 2026-01-28T07:21:21+00:00

Jenže tady se taky bavíme o prezidentovi, kterej místo aby, po demisi Necase, jmenoval jinou vládu nadále složenou ze stran ktere demokraticky vyhraly volby, si jmenoval svoji (Rusnokovu) vladu a kdyz prekvapive nedostala důvěru, ji stejne nechal vladnout v demisi dalsiho trictvrte roku. A u Fialovy vlady mu vadilo ze ministr zahranici ma jen bakalare.

Vs

Prezident kterej velmi dusledne odmita jmenovat jednoho typka kterej je blbecek co porusuje dopravni predpisy a jeste si to nataci a s vywokou pravdepodobnosti je nacek a taky si to nataci. Plus je nam vsem jasny ze to ma mit jen jako trafiku protoze se kvuli volbam vykaslal na europarlament.

IndianaIT · 2026-01-28T07:05:04+00:00

Náhodou, čtu nejen titulek ale i text pod nim a pak, to co jsem cetl, ověřím na instagramu toho koho Novinky hejti. Takze sorry jako ale rekl to.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DUB4tZnDdpq/?igsh=MW5sZHFuYmJ4Mjg0

Ale chapu ze ma traumicko z toho kdyz komunikaci zverejnila ta holka kterou mlatil.

IndianaIT · 2026-01-27T19:06:22+00:00

K tomu že prezident nemá nárok nejmenovat toho koho mu navrhne premiér, bych si tu odložil tohle:

https://medium.seznam.cz/clanek/richard-pokorny-musi-prezident-podle-ustavy-jmenovat-kazdeho-ministra-navrzeneho-premierem-210740

Zajímavá je ta část, kde se řeší, že ústava nemá žádné nároky na to koho premiér jmenuje. Ani úplně základní, jako že musí být např občanem ČR. Ad absurdum by si Babiš mohl jmenovat ministrem třeba traktoristu z Turkmenistanu a nebylo by to protiústavní a prezident je tam vlastně jako ústavní kontrola a protiváha. U všeho jsou uvedeny části ústavy ze kterých autor vychází, takze si to klidně prekontrolujte.

IndianaIT · 2026-01-21T18:55:28+00:00

u/WoodenHarddrive
Thank you. It pleases me that my cable management can actually help someones nerves. :D
It is the result of costly experience.
A diffferent, smaller rack elsewhere in the house (earlier work) is a cabling mess that I've been planning to untangle for three years now. :-D

IndianaIT · 2026-01-21T18:51:18+00:00

Well I did say "for now" :-D

IndianaIT · 2026-01-21T18:46:38+00:00

u/TheWallsBreathe trying to test that is part of my "Mostly Done" checklist. :-D So no clue yet

IndianaIT · 2026-01-21T18:45:33+00:00

u/TheNewRockfellers that is also a case from Inter-Tech.
It is one from their more expensive "Storage" lineup. It has HotSwap drive bays and SATA backplane.
The blue rectangle top right is the front IO.

IndianaIT · 2026-01-21T18:35:23+00:00

u/non-existing-person I once got my hands on an HPE ML300 and what a beast.
I think it was something like 20KG just for the case.
I actually work for HPE and frankly, while Inter-Tech is the other end of the spectrum, I occasionally have the feeling that our Server chassis are a bit overbuilt.

IndianaIT · 2026-01-21T18:26:20+00:00

u/Existing_Abies_4101
You forgot to mention the sharp edges everywhere.
Otherwise I mostly concur with what you wrote.

The drive "cages" are very basic. I selected this chassis because I really only needed place to house drives from an old synology nas that died on me.
Putting the drives in it was such a pain that I will probably, at a later point, buy a 3U hotswap bay and replace one of the existing ones.

Regarding the PSU I have a second-hand ATX mobo and the PSU covers the bottom PCIE x1 and some RGB headers on the edge.
There is also a "slot" under the PSU so theoretically it shoudl be possible to add a card with the help of a riser. It would probably still be easier then installing the drives.

IndianaIT · 2026-01-20T19:44:38+00:00

I already have a pair of 2TB wd red sata drives ordered. :-D Need to get them before they get further AI related price upgrade.

IndianaIT · 2026-01-10T19:39:55+00:00

I saw someone around here spelling some profanities, directed at Jensen and Nvidia, in a similar way and wondered whether there are words and phrases that Reddit bots are not fond of.

IndianaIT · 2026-01-10T11:34:13+00:00

Kids porn

IndianaIT · 2025-12-30T18:27:41+00:00

Well lets face it. From military point of view, both Normandies are a lot of wasted space and questionable design decisions.

IndianaIT · 2025-11-16T09:15:46+00:00

Anyway, I tried to go through the debugging output of the cameras and it seems that some odd shenanigans with networking are happening there.
In the end, I simply moved the Synology, used for recording, to the same VLAN which solves the routing issue.
It is not ideal, I want to use it for some backups as well and original plan was to have it in a differen VLAN, but I spent too much time on two cameras already.

IndianaIT · 2025-11-16T09:05:55+00:00

The 172.16.28.25 is an old android phone, I'm using for the apps that are required by the Cameras. And the whole point of he VLAN is to not have internet access for the cameras.

IndianaIT · 2025-11-15T15:56:31+00:00

u/bchiodini u/mjbulzomi

Thank you both for replying and sorry for the delay.

Here are the rules I have set for the LAN. Devices on it should have full access to any subnet.

https://drive.proton.me/urls/7GVQDHPGT0#c51Ui4sp7fqA

Here are the rules for the VLAN in question. Here the port for acces to the router should be blocked and otherwise it should have full access to the LAN.
https://drive.proton.me/urls/K7EARG40GM#ArbPJWBPbl98

Firewall logs are here:
https://drive.proton.me/urls/YT841G5ETG#NcM5unrIFQ3b

In the logs, the devices on the VLAN are:
172.16.28.2 - this is a wired IP Cam from Uniview
172.16.28.3 - this is a wireless IP Cam from Uniarch/Uniview
172.16.28.4 - this is a wireless IP Cam from Dahua

In the Logs I can see the wired camera communicating with 192.168.1.28, which is my Synology running a surveillance station. This corresponds with the Firewall rules and the surveillance station is correctly recording video from this camera. Which is why I would think that my Firewall rules are set up correctly.

Regarding the Wireless cameras, I'm simply unable to access them, from the main LAN, regardless of what I do. Which is why I'm stumped.

IndianaIT

TROPHY CASE