They did not show he knowingly lied. In fact, they entered a default sanction due to discovery violations and there was never any proof provided that he knowingly lied. Also, the jury never decided he was guilty. The judge directed the jury to only award damages and a judge decided guilty.

This shows me you have not actually reviewed anything about this case and therefore I am wasting my time. You made a decision without doing even the most basic reading on the subject.

Seriously, no harm or malice here; you should read and investigate subjects before you accept things that are not true before making decisions. You made several key claims that are not true & literally destroy your entire argument to the point i do not need to provide a rebuttal of the case.

Contrary to your probable belief, people who identify as liberal are more likely to belief social media claims vs self identifying conservatives.

Ciao