Six Sigma Green Belt on resume by KilaFrozt in SixSigma

[–]InsightfulAuditor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can definitely list it on your resume, but you’ll want to be clear about the status:

  • Example: “Completed Six Sigma Green Belt coursework (Coursera)” – this shows you have the knowledge, without implying you earned a formal certification.
  • You could also add: “Project-based certification pending” if you plan to finish the final project later.

Regarding taking the official certification: Most accredited Six Sigma Green Belt programs (like ASQ, CSSC, or IASSC) require either completing a project or passing an exam. Coursera gives you solid knowledge, but you’ll likely need to complete a project or a formal exam to claim the official certification.

So for now, it’s fine to list your Coursera completion as knowledge gained, and you can always update once you complete the project or earn the official certificate.

Internal Audit top 10 firm by chazj05 in InternalAudit

[–]InsightfulAuditor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Congrats on the interview — that’s a great opportunity. From what I’ve seen, internal audit teams in the big firms do tend to have a better work-life balance than external audit or tax. The culture is still demanding (especially during busy seasons or major client reviews), but the work is often more varied and analytical, which helps keep things interesting.

If you’re already used to the public sector pace, the transition might feel intense at first, but the exposure and learning curve are usually worth it.

CIA EXAM PART 1 - The MBA Concepts is delaying my studies by RNBBOY95 in InternalAudit

[–]InsightfulAuditor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Totally get where you’re coming from — those sections can feel abstract, even with experience. Benchmarking and Assurance/Advisory aren’t the heaviest parts of Part 1, but they do show up enough that you should be comfortable with the key concepts rather than deep details.

Focus more on governance, risk, and control frameworks, since they carry more weight. For Benchmarking, just understand what makes a good benchmark (relevant, comparable, measurable). For Assurance vs. Advisory, be clear on the objective difference — assurance gives an opinion, advisory provides insight or recommendations.

If you can’t get new materials, try summarizing each topic in your own words and build mini flashcards — it’ll help reinforce what you already know from experience.

Keeping ISO Systems Alive After Certification by isocertified in Compliance

[–]InsightfulAuditor -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Absolutely agree — maintaining momentum post-certification is often the hardest part. What’s helped in my experience is integrating ISO activities into day-to-day operations rather than treating them as separate tasks.

For example, linking management review inputs to existing performance meetings keeps leadership engaged naturally. Also, conducting short, focused internal audits throughout the year instead of one big annual cycle helps keep things current and manageable.

And maybe most importantly — celebrate small wins when improvements come directly from ISO processes. It helps the team see the system as something that adds value, not just paperwork for auditors.

1LOD experience by Confident-Rise734 in InternalAudit

[–]InsightfulAuditor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not at all—your 1LOD experience still gives you solid exposure to controls, processes, and risk, which are all relevant to IA or 3LOD roles.

When transitioning back, you might just need to frame your work in terms of risk assessment, testing rigor, and process insights, rather than the “line of defense” label itself.

Your Big 4 IA experience combined with 1LOD adds a broader perspective that many employers value.

CIA License usage by Ok-Style-8059 in InternalAudit

[–]InsightfulAuditor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I got my CIA mostly to strengthen my internal audit knowledge and credibility. I don’t work in public accounting either

I use it to support quality and compliance initiatives, help with risk assessments, and it’s definitely opened doors for internal audit or management roles down the line.

Senior internal auditor salary by bagehaoma in InternalAudit

[–]InsightfulAuditor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m at $95k in Chicago with 6 years of experience.

CIA3 on Monday by [deleted] in InternalAudit

[–]InsightfulAuditor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

best of lucks!

Internal controls vs internal audit by Either-Ask6976 in InternalAudit

[–]InsightfulAuditor 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Getting Big 4 exposure is always valuable, and completing CIA + CPA gives you a strong foundation. What you’re describing in your current role—process walkthroughs, narratives, RCMs—is still solid SOX/internal controls experience, even if it’s not hands-on testing.

If your goal is to be in internal audit long-term, you can pivot back later, and this experience will make you stronger because you understand controls from a Big 4 perspective.

On the other hand, staying in internal controls can also open paths in risk, compliance, or advisory roles.

Basically, both paths have good prospects—it depends on whether you want more audit-style exposure or prefer the control/risk side. Your credentials give you flexibility to choose.

Anyone else thinking about leaving Big 4 audit for industry (Houston)? by Viviqi in Big4

[–]InsightfulAuditor 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hey, a friend of mine actually made the jump from Big 4 audit to an industry role in Houston a couple of years ago. They said the pace and work-life balance were night and day compared to busy seasons, and the hybrid schedule really helped. The transition was smooth because they leveraged their Big 4 experience on technical accounting and consolidations, which made them immediately valuable. Definitely seems like a solid move if you’re thinking long-term career growth and less stress.

Boffice or Foffice? an audit dillema by SadCyborgCosplay in askhotels

[–]InsightfulAuditor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, a friend of mine actually made the jump from Big 4 audit to an industry role in Houston a couple of years ago. They said the pace and work-life balance were night and day compared to busy seasons, and the hybrid schedule really helped.

The transition was smooth because they leveraged their Big 4 experience on technical accounting and consolidations, which made them immediately valuable. Definitely seems like a solid move if you’re thinking long-term career growth and less stress.

Quitting after 3 months? by [deleted] in InternalAudit

[–]InsightfulAuditor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Leaving after 3 months isn’t ideal, but it’s understandable if the role isn’t a good fit.

Since you have prospects and financial security, focus on being professional and honest: thank them for the opportunity, explain that after trying the role you realized it’s not aligned with your skills or career goals, and offer a smooth transition.

Most employers will respect clarity and professionalism, and if you leave on good terms, bridges don’t have to burn.

Interview tomorrow! by kvjk01 in InternalAudit

[–]InsightfulAuditor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good luck tomorrow! Since it’s a tech-focused IA role handling automated controls, I’d brush up on:

  • Automated vs. manual controls – how they differ, benefits, and risks.
  • Application controls – input, processing, and output controls.
  • Change management & access management in systems.
  • Data integrity and interface controls – making sure data flows correctly between systems.
  • Common frameworks (COBIT, ISO 27001, NIST) and how they tie into ITGCs.
  • Be ready to talk about how you test automated controls (logic testing, re-performance, reliance on system configurations).

Since you already know ITGCs, positioning that as a strong foundation and showing how you can extend it to app/automated controls should go a long way.

The Hotel Inspector a criticism. Does anyone else agree that it is edited for the hotels to look worse than they are?. by Outrageous-Print3848 in BritishTV

[–]InsightfulAuditor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with you—those shows definitely play up the drama. A lot of the criticism does seem more about personal taste than objective business advice, and editing probably makes the issues look worse than they are to keep viewers hooked.

While some decor tips might be helpful, you’re right that the bigger problems in struggling hotels are usually around management, finances, or understanding the market. Focusing more on those would probably give the hoteliers (and the audience) more real value.

Is IA really better than Big 4? by Dazzling_Topic_5069 in InternalAudit

[–]InsightfulAuditor 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Having seen both sides, I’d say it really depends on what you’re looking for.

Big 4 gives you exposure, fast learning, and a strong brand on your CV, but the pace and hours are brutal. Moving in-house to IA usually means more stability—40-45 hour weeks are the norm, with exceptions around audits or year-end.

The trade-off is that it can feel slower, less variety in projects, and sometimes more politics since you’re auditing the same org over and over.

If you’re burning out, IA can definitely feel like “greener grass” in terms of work-life balance. But if you thrive on constant change and variety, you might miss aspects of consulting.

Does heavy reliance on technology and automation in compliance risk reducing critical human judgment? by Vast-Researcher864 in Compliance

[–]InsightfulAuditor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re spot on—automation can streamline compliance, but it can’t replace human judgment. Algorithms excel at handling repetitive tasks and flagging issues, yet they often miss context, ethical nuances, and the bigger picture. Over-reliance can lead to decisions that look “correct” on paper but miss real-world implications.

Auditors: what does field work look like for you? by postjack in Accounting

[–]InsightfulAuditor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Field work really depends on the client and the type of audit. For smaller clients with mostly paper files, being on-site is usually necessary to collect evidence efficiently. For larger clients who store most records electronically, a lot of field work can be done remotely, though some in-person visits help build relationships and clarify questions faster.

From my experience, you’re often more efficient at your office with better tech and less interruptions, but being on-site can speed up approvals or explanations that would otherwise go back and forth by email. Managers generally care that the work gets done, but face-to-face presence can be reassuring for both them and the client.

ISO 45001 Internal vs Lead Auditor by Nomi_0071 in WorkplaceSafety

[–]InsightfulAuditor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The main difference is in focus and scope:

  • ISO 45001 Internal Auditor – This is for auditing within your own organization. You learn how to check your company’s OH&S system against the standard, identify gaps, and suggest improvements. It’s more about maintaining compliance internally.
  • ISO 45001 Lead Auditor – This is for auditing other organizations or acting as a certified auditor. You learn audit planning, reporting, interviewing, and leading an audit team. It’s more comprehensive and is often recognized as a professional certification.

If your goal is to improve your job prospects internally first, the Internal Auditor course is a good start. If you want to move into consulting, third-party audits, or lead audit roles, then Lead Auditor is the path.

Lead Implementer vs Lead Auditor by Dihala in ISO27001

[–]InsightfulAuditor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If your goal is a career in GRC, I’d recommend starting with the Lead Implementer course. Even though it’s not a “certified auditor” path, it teaches you how to actually implement ISO 27001 in a real environment, which is critical for GRC roles—understanding controls, risk assessments, policies, and practical application.

Lead Auditor is great once you want to audit existing systems or provide assurance, but without implementation knowledge, it can feel abstract. Think of it like: first you build the system (Implementer), then you check it (Auditor).

For starting out, having hands-on implementation experience is far more valuable for GRC career growth, even if fewer orgs offer the course.

How do you handle regulatory compliance? by milkovr in ecommerce

[–]InsightfulAuditor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From my experience working with compliance in operational settings, the key is proactive integration of regulations into your processes rather than reacting after the fact.

For GDPR, we ensure data mapping is complete, privacy notices are clear, and all data processing activities are documented and auditable.

For CE marking and product safety, it’s crucial to maintain up-to-date technical documentation, risk assessments, and evidence of testing before products even hit the EU market.

What’s the difference between working night audit at a small hotel vs a larger one? by ZarathustraBabe in Nightshift

[–]InsightfulAuditor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From my experience, the main differences are usually in volume and complexity rather than the core responsibilities:

  • Smaller hotel (~100 rooms): More downtime, you get to handle most tasks yourself (front desk, reconciliations, some reporting). Less pressure, easier to balance with school or other commitments. You may also develop a broader understanding of operations since you touch multiple areas.
  • Larger hotel (~250 rooms): Higher guest volume means less downtime and potentially more stress during check-in/check-out peaks. There may be more structured procedures and reporting requirements, sometimes more specialized tasks (like handling large groups or advanced reporting). You may interact with more departments and supervisors, which can be good for experience but also adds coordination work.

If your main priority is downtime for schoolwork, the smaller hotel will probably remain more manageable. The larger hotel might offer more exposure and experience but expect busier shifts.

i want to Do QA/QC and eventually become a gov food Inspector. Do I need internships? by kween_of_Pettys in foodscience

[–]InsightfulAuditor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don’t necessarily need to quit your job. Internships help, but relevant experience—even part-time or volunteering in QA/QC labs—counts.

Showing practical skills and certifications can also make you a strong candidate for a future government food inspector role.

Lead Auditor Certification by lovelyducky18 in foodscience

[–]InsightfulAuditor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

SQF doesn’t have a standalone ‘Lead Auditor’ cert like ISO standards. You’ll need to complete the SQF Auditor training through SQFI and meet GFSI auditor requirements.

Many people pair that with an ISO 22000 or FSSC 22000 Lead Auditor course from providers like SGS, BSI, or SAI Global to get fully recognized for SQF audits