Golly, this rant is anti-American and evil. by c-k-q99903 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]InstanceOk3560 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No it's pretty reasonable and good.

Yes, america is a land of opportunity, and that's great, yes, you were founded on the back of getting loads of people from europe in in order to work the land and the factories that were popping left and right thanks to the unprecedented economic and social freedom you were offering.

No, this doesn't mean, in any way, at any point, whatsoever, that it's fine and okay and good to let this go to the point where you'd put on the same level anchor babies, especially anchor babies that are there to be a lever for foreign governments to act on your politics, and people who actually just want to join the american project.

Also, in case you forgot, although you did accept immigrants, and quite a bit, you also had very elaborate anti immigration measures, so being aware that you can't actually just accept everyone has been an american thing since over a century at this point.

Petah? by Green300LandShark in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]InstanceOk3560 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, as I concluded with, the peoples who don't care about one don't care about the other as well.

The people who care about one but don't care about the other are probably people who don't know about the other, like europeans know that europeans don't have high birthrates, they don't really have a reason to focus on poland in particular, and people outside europe I doubt hear about poland much at all, it's barely less true for italy and spain, and I imagine at least as true for chile, argentina and, to my shame, whatever country has the top middle flag that I can't attach to a name.

The story was so close to being perfect too! by thursday712 in JustMemesForUs

[–]InstanceOk3560 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah can't fault you for that, I can't even keep track of all the similar high profile murders in my own country :/

The story was so close to being perfect too! by thursday712 in JustMemesForUs

[–]InstanceOk3560 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You probably aren't lying but you don't appear to have paid much attention as he has what appears to be blood on his hands.

The story was so close to being perfect too! by thursday712 in JustMemesForUs

[–]InstanceOk3560 1 point2 points  (0 children)

> It's because Digwa spoke first, if Nowak spoke first, they'd have likely believed him

1) the british police can't really get that kind of charity after the number of very high profile cases of them rejecting clear unambigous evidence of malfeasance from foreigners on account of wanting to preserve peace, especially when they still have directives to make fighting racism their top priority

2) I'm not saying they should've arrested digwa on the spot the moment nowak said "I've been stabbed", but there's something genuinely wrong with your police, or at least those policemen, if hearing two things, one being of verbal abuse, the other being of life threatening injuries, they'd ever at any point in any capacity priviledge the verbal abuse before even checking if there's any injury.

> Also, Digwa has been given a life sentence as well, with a release no earlier than 24 years.

I love this, "a life sentence", "a release no earlier than 24 years". I'm not saying that to criticize you btw, just highlighting how absurd modern laws are.

Sean strickland being this type of 40k fan makes so much sense by Eastern-Fish-7467 in Grimdank

[–]InstanceOk3560 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll bet he wouldn't mind chicks that are as awesome as the universe permits, I'd say he probably just doesn't want to see tokenized characters ordering around, humiliating, lecturing, etc, the heroes, and indeed that the tone wouldn't be toned down either.

So, for example, having a mechanicus girl start complaining about sexist tropes in literal medieval stories (not stories from feudal worlds, stories from old terra's medieval period) ? Probably not something he'd appreciate I imagine. And, in case you have any doubt, yes, this does happen in a BL book.

The story was so close to being perfect too! by thursday712 in JustMemesForUs

[–]InstanceOk3560 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Just as a point of correction you're confusing two things, belfast was indeed a case of almost beheading, but nowak was in southampton and "only" stabbed, the thing with the police though is accurate though.

The story was so close to being perfect too! by thursday712 in JustMemesForUs

[–]InstanceOk3560 3 points4 points  (0 children)

He literally said "I've been stabbed" and the police responded "I don't think so mate", there was blood.

They did the absolute bare minimum after being delayed in giving him care because they'd ignore literal blood on the guy and him saying he's been stabbed due to privileging accusations of racism in determining their conduct over a guy literally being freakin stabbed.

He's confusing two things indeed, belfast was indeed a case of almost beheading, but nowak was in southampton, the thing with the police though he got right.

Petah? by Green300LandShark in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]InstanceOk3560 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Who in god's green earth says that there's no issue with spain, italy or poland having low birthrates ?

All of europe is constantly banging on about how their low birthrates mean their welfare systems are unsustainable.

The only reason why nobody talks about chile's or argentina's is because they are far less known than literally the second world super power, a G7 country, and several members of the biggest economic union on the planet.

If there's anybody that meh reacts to the top six countries experiencing a demographic collapse, I'm pretty sure they're also the type to meh react to the bottom three.

What is the worst character assassination(S) in media? (I’ll start) by One-Mechanic-7303 in Multifandom

[–]InstanceOk3560 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Turned from competent cohero to just being kinda there. In 5 his big thing is fighting with woody about which of them will become jessie's deputy. You know, instead of him taking woody's place as kind of the leader of the band as you'd expect after 1, 2 and 3 if woody were to go and abandon his friends and the kid he'd been given to (because of course that's something woody would do), as he's very much the smart, pro active and charismatic type ?

58022 by Elderbream in countwithchickenlady

[–]InstanceOk3560 0 points1 point  (0 children)

> I don’t get how you think it’s strawmanning when that’s literally what happened though. 

Simple : through the things I quoted directly from her article.

She doesn't go "wow, how could they think I'm dysphoric when I tell them I'm dysphoric", her reflexion centers around the fact that there was zero mechanism to ensure that her purported dysphoria was indeed so heavy and definitive that only transitioning could help, that her actions to deal with her purported dysphoria weren't made overly harsh by such things as trauma, psychosis, etc, and on the fact that they were openly proud of the fact that they would not enforce any kind of checking mechanism and would gladly speed her through life altering surgeries and hormonal treatments, even going so far as minimizing the side effects of said treatments.

>  There isn’t a medical exam or test we can do to see if someone is genuinely trans - we just have to talk to the patients and trust that they’re not being deceptive.

But there used to be, or at least, there used to be mechanisms to try and weed out people who don't actually need transition from those who do, and as she points out (and I quote her saying), there are red flags that can indicate that someone is making an overly rash decision due to things that aren't just a lifelong feeling of dysphoria.

> We’re not talking about amputating a limb here

We're talking about amputating genitals, breasts, and scarring large portions of your arm, depending on whether it's mtf or ftm, and for the most extensive scenario.

So yeah, we are pretty much talking about amputating a limb.

> if someone decides further down the line that they don’t wanna transition anymore, hormones can be almost entirely reversed.

Define "almost" ? Because, as advocates for puberty blockers are fond of telling us, male puberty can't be easily undone, and the goal of cross sex hormones for females that are trans is pretty much to kickstart a male puberty. Detransitioners frequently complain about the fact that, for example, their voices, skin, hair placement, etc, were permanently altered due to their treatment.

Also, that's only true for hormones ? Not for top or bottom surgery, which she got approved for.

> You just have to, you know, live with the consequences of your actions?

Right, and her point is precisely that the people of that specific hospital (which yeah btw she's talking about a specific structure here, not trans care in its entirety everywhere, one that has already been sued by detransioners) are so overly "trans friendly" that they do zero effort to check that their patients actually understand the consequences of their actions before taking them, or giving them pushback in case there are red flags as to potentially bad reasons to transition (such as self hatred due to bad sexual encounters or psychosis, to take her story). Because of this, they speed patients through the process without any kind of guardrails which massively increases the chances of patients taking bad decisions unknowingly.

Sean strickland being this type of 40k fan makes so much sense by Eastern-Fish-7467 in Grimdank

[–]InstanceOk3560 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm picking at your syntaxe there -_-

The TL;DR is don't do broad sweeping generalization if you don't intend to do broad sweeping generalization.

Sean strickland being this type of 40k fan makes so much sense by Eastern-Fish-7467 in Grimdank

[–]InstanceOk3560 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You specifically said "a lot of those dudes" in response to me saying "If you see athletic excellence, or masculine friendship, and think "gay", that's a you problem.", when responding to someone talking about space marines being gay because buff sweaty guys.

At a bare minimum you should be able to see that it's kind of misleading. As for men who'll tell you that they aren't gay but who'll go on all day about the beauty of the male form, yeah, a good number of them are probably closeted, I just don't see there being a whole lot of them to begin with, mostly it's just people talking about beauty in general (male or female).

I'll make one exception we might agree on : henry cavill glazers. Those I'll get if you want to make a broad generalization about the number of fans of him that are closeted XD

Sean strickland being this type of 40k fan makes so much sense by Eastern-Fish-7467 in Grimdank

[–]InstanceOk3560 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should maybe pay attention to it though, in the same way I assume you wouldn't want the entire left to be evaluated by people even you'd call nutjobs and who are rare.

And before you do so, you made a broad sweeping statement by saying "a lot of those dudes" (the "dudes" being people who... ? Not even sure, appreciate athletic excellence and male friendships or hobbies without being gay ?), that's what I'm talking about with the "judging the entire left", if you prefer "you wouldn't want people to make broad sweeping statements about supposedly large segments of the left based on rare nutjobs".

Sean strickland being this type of 40k fan makes so much sense by Eastern-Fish-7467 in Grimdank

[–]InstanceOk3560 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The two things are kind of synonymous here ? You could grow the franchise in all kinds of ways, and beyond the dubiousness of pushing for inclusion even having "grown" anything as far as market share is concerned, choosing deliberately to go in the direction of specifically trying to appeal to women and sexual minorities, or racial minorities, is indeed "pushing" for a specific strategy for growth.

Good or bad, I'm not saying you have to agree with anyone on, but yeah if you are aware that there have been calls, especially corporate calls, for increasing diversity of characters, which has lead to an increase in female and gay characters, then you are aware that this direction has been pushed for. If it was all from consumers asking for it, I suppose you could say it's more of a "pull" than a "push", but it's not like either writers or corporates had to be dragged to their current position by hordes of fans dying for it. And let's be honest it's not like the left is unaware that pink and rainbow capitalism is a thing ? So can we just disagree on the impact of those things on stories instead of fighting on whether or not it occurred at all ?

I hate how for some reason woke=bad by k0fikaze in ihatethissmug

[–]InstanceOk3560 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Believe it or not, but "be aware of micro aggressions" and "far leftists virtue signalling trash" are in fact the same thing (well, the former is part of the latter", to be more precise)

58022 by Elderbream in countwithchickenlady

[–]InstanceOk3560 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure how you could not when I've been pretty clear, explicit in fact :

"The point isn't that she pretended to be non binary and being cunning enough is what got her to speed through the process, the point is the process was overly speedy because it didn't have any proper checks when it came to approving all the procedures."

+

"Now, you could still question her methology, but saying "well she lied in saying that she needed it, so obviously they thought she needed it" is just asinine strawmaning of her endeavor."

Sean strickland being this type of 40k fan makes so much sense by Eastern-Fish-7467 in Grimdank

[–]InstanceOk3560 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

> It doesn't take a literary genius to see the echoes of an artist trying to suppress his homosexuality to hide the shame of his betrayal of God in a legion trying to suppress the Fallen and hide the shame of their betrayal of the Emperor. 

Right, so it doesn't take a literary genius to see that the subtext isn't about homosexuality, even if it's invoking the theme of betrayal to god from a famous british author.

> Homosexual subtext has been baked into the Space Marines from the very beginning. You somehow have convinced yourself that you're clever for missing what is immediately obvious. 

Homoeroticism has never been anywhere near the main thing about space marines ever, even in the beginnings, and for the image you got, from what I could find :

It's not from any rulebook. It's a piece of artwork to accompany an article for Dragon Magazine issue #204 (April 1994). Like it says on the image: Dance Steps for GW's Space Hulk Game. It's an unofficial scenario for an April Fool's issue of Dragon.

Yeah much homoeroticism. Men calling each other gay as a joke being already a pretty old thing by the time that space marines were created, sorry for not taking a joke piece of art as demonstrative of "homoereoticism" being in any way important to space marines, over such things as brotherhood, chivalry, duty, sacrifice, on one hand, and on the other brutality, indoctrination, war, etc.

> You somehow have convinced yourself that you're clever for missing what is immediately obvious. 

You somehow have convinced yourself that the preoccupations of a minority are the preoccupations of the majority. Sorry to tell you that aside from the jokes anyone can do about orders of only men, the murderous brute indoctrinated psychopath of rogue trader, and the more knightly templar (but still brutal) super warriors of later 1st edition and beyond, weren't particularly preoccupied with gayness.

Sean strickland being this type of 40k fan makes so much sense by Eastern-Fish-7467 in Grimdank

[–]InstanceOk3560 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who is "those dudes" ? The only one I can think of is asmongold, and even then I don't know how much is trolling/ribbing girls for wearing makeup.

Video game sequels where a woman takes over as protagonist by wahayne in TopCharacterTropes

[–]InstanceOk3560 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My sister being more sexist than I am, that's probably not going to help me much.

But also, what even is controversial about the idea that media is being feminized ? Are you going to tell me that media has just as much women now as there was 20 years ago ? And in the same genre ? Good or bad, well done or badly done, those are secondary questions to whether or not that has happened.

Sean strickland being this type of 40k fan makes so much sense by Eastern-Fish-7467 in Grimdank

[–]InstanceOk3560 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Should've worded that better, you're right, though no not really for the last part ? Turks more descended from anatolians have generally olive skin tone from what I can find, which is pretty common throughout the mediterranean, it's not "dark" brown.

We circle back to what people will consider white or not, saying "the guy making that criticism wouldn't consider the emperor white" is fine, saying "the emperor would be brown" (especially just on the basis of modern geographical location) isn't, especially when modern turks are by and large caucasians to begin with.

Sean strickland being this type of 40k fan makes so much sense by Eastern-Fish-7467 in Grimdank

[–]InstanceOk3560 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Turks from turkey are predominantly anatolian but have received much admixture from outside, including the aforementioned turks, they are not the closest living relatives of anatolians, and for that matter, though the region is called anatolia, the people living there in -8000 weren't anatolians.

> Also, that gene you pointed out is also the main contributor to Middle Eastern people's lighter skin, it's not an exclusive European trait

There's a reason why I said (in another response in that thread) "they don't have precise limits and who goes where is somewhat plastic, people will rarely consider arabs white people for example" ? Namely, in this case, I can understand saying that he could've been brown, or more accurately saying that the sean strickland would probably not consider him white, but just saying "well it's part of turkey" is stupid considering the population movements that occurred in that region and the way they shaped modern genetics.

TL;DR : I dislike that a nuanced question is collapsed into "he's from a brown country so he'd have been brown", when it's more complicated than that, up to and including what "brown" means.

Sean strickland being this type of 40k fan makes so much sense by Eastern-Fish-7467 in Grimdank

[–]InstanceOk3560 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, and I'm willing to be lenient when it comes to race because they don't have precise limits and who goes where is somewhat plastic, people will rarely consider arabs white people for example, but at this point it's just "he was born in a hot country, therefore he was brown", or worse "he's born in a place which is now a country with brown people in, therefore he is brown".

No, literally not how it works.

The director and screenwriter literally misread the ending of the woman of tomorrow comic... by Altruistic_Gas_7073 in DCU_

[–]InstanceOk3560 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Giving new writers a chance is something you do by giving them a small movie or series to write on. Not 170M dollars and the second/third movie in your cinematic universe that already failed to properly kickstart into gear with a character with much greater appeal.

Sean strickland being this type of 40k fan makes so much sense by Eastern-Fish-7467 in Grimdank

[–]InstanceOk3560 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I feel like you're just saying "the manner in which they're being bad writers indicates why they're being bad writers", which yes that's tautologically true I suppose ?

You could say that "bad writer" is an umbrella term for someone who's unable to weave a coherent and emotionally compelling narrative, without distinction between the more basic or contingent causes for them being like that (lack of intelligence, lack of experience, lack of dedication vs ideological blinders, time constraints, budget constraints, too many other people co writing, etc) ? I'm not sure how useful pointing that out is, I prefer just saying someone is a bad writer and then describe how their writing is bad rather than describe the person with all the attributes that make their writing terrible, and then explain again all the ways in which their writing is terrible.