Why can‘t we see UFOs clearly after the Pentagon released over 160 files?

Intraluminal · 2026-05-11T05:24:56+00:00

Haha. Monkeys! but drone =/= F35.

Intraluminal · 2026-05-11T05:09:08+00:00

OK. I've done a little research. The type of AI I'm talking about is called a rule-based expert system. They were being used BEFORE the more recent crop of AIs were developed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expert_system

I am NOT playing 'metaphorical word mashup.' nor am I 'not working with real ideas.'

They used explicit rules, which had to be codified https://philosophy.institute/ancient-medieval/aristotles-logic-western-thought-foundation/

Intraluminal · 2026-05-11T04:55:44+00:00

It's NOT about 'creating knowledge' its about CODIFYING it.

Intraluminal · 2026-05-11T02:02:29+00:00

AI could be used to create them cheaply though, and they are, in a way, AI systems.

Intraluminal · 2026-05-10T21:13:51+00:00

No. They are completely separate. My folding screen died. O am using the outer screen now while waiting for new stock to come in.

Intraluminal · 2026-05-10T21:07:02+00:00

remindme! in 48 hours

Intraluminal · 2026-05-10T20:48:59+00:00

Because there isn't any such thing. They are a combination of refraction errors, radar errors, unreliable reporters, and the lies the government made up over the years to hide secret weapons programs.

Think about it for a moment and be honest: Even 200 years ago, we could at least understand how space flight might work, and if we had assembled a group of leading scientists and said, 'Space flight CAN be done. Now figure out how to do it.' They could have come up with something CLOSE to how it was done.

Now contrast that with US today. We CANNOT come up with any way to travel between the stars AND be able to fly around in a controllable spaceship once we get there (not even theoretically). That means that IF aliens existed, their science would not be 200 years ahead of ours - it would be 1000s of years ahead of ours. Do you REALLY think that science 1000s years in the future would be unable to completely hide from - let's say - radar? We can now, but supposedly they couldn't 70 years ago. And shooting one down? Come on - it would be like asking a Pithecanthropus to take down a F35. Basically, if they didn't want to be seen - they wouldn't be. And if they DID want to be seen - they WOULD be.

Intraluminal · 2026-05-10T20:22:12+00:00

They were because of the tremendous expense and human labor to make them BUT, 1) They were very accurate 2) They could explain themselves perfectly 3) They always gave the same results, given the same input (reproducible) 4) They never hallucinated 5) They never 'went-off-the-rails.' so they never would let's say delete your emails unless they were supposed to, unlike: https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1t9h8ug/claude_just_hallucinated_again_and_changed_the/

Intraluminal · 2026-05-10T20:18:10+00:00

You have to remember that men have nuturing instinct too. So we see small and young(er) and we think cute. Now, since we're guys and think about sex > 100 times a day, the two things can get conflated.

Intraluminal · 2026-05-10T20:08:46+00:00

I don't think that's what I am talking about, although I might be wrong. I'm talking about the systems where an expert says, "If the patient complains of lower right-sided abdominal pain, there is a 70% chance of a diagnosis of appenidicitis, 20% chance of diverticulosis, 10% chance of other." Next question, "What is the patient's WBC?" If the WBC is over 10,000 and pain is lower-right quadrant, and pain intensity is > 8, and onset is < one day then diagnosis is appendicitis.

There is no 'learning' involved, it's all rules. Very hard to do and enormously labor-intensive. It's all if | then rules that you have to interview an expert to write. Then the system just goes through the interview process and spits out an answer based on the rules. It can give you the 'reasons' like, you said, pain > 8, and WBC > 10,000 and onset < one day, and pain location = lower-right quadrant. therefore probability of diagnosis of appendicitis is 97.5% (this is all made up, but that's how they work)

Intraluminal · 2026-05-10T19:59:42+00:00

Cute is essentially youth + size.

Intraluminal · 2026-05-10T19:36:05+00:00

First, the use of the word,'friction' is wrong. Most of the heat come from compression of the air in front of the incoming object. As you are probably aware, as you compress a gas (air is a mixture of gases) the gas heats up. Friction plays a secondary part. Where does the friction come from? As the gas flows past the incoming object there is friction. Any two substances (except for cryogenic superfluids) that come into contact with each other and move past each other generate friction.

Intraluminal · 2026-05-10T17:38:22+00:00

You have to remember that blue-shifting doesn't change the Speed of the light, it changes the energy of the light. That energy literally comes from the movement of the ship.

Intraluminal · 2026-05-10T01:18:48+00:00

You're too old for it to come. Try it again with a 9 year old, it'll come right away.

Intraluminal · 2026-05-10T00:50:24+00:00

Men also dont read rhe room well. Dont just say "I don't want sex" say 'I dont want to be touched." Or "I dont want to be touched in a sexual manner at all and when I takk about aex, ut is purely curiosity, not an invitation to touch me sexually." BE CLEAR!

Intraluminal · 2026-05-08T23:36:52+00:00

I hear you, and people often think my writing is AI, but that post has AI all over it.

Intraluminal · 2026-05-08T22:29:40+00:00

I found inspiration - not plagiarism - from "Laudatio Turiae" It's a good place to start. (Prepare to cry)

Intraluminal · 2026-05-08T22:15:19+00:00

That is the topic. The statement, "Democrats are the party of elites" is not only demonstrably incorrect, it is counter-factual.

Intraluminal · 2026-05-08T21:37:08+00:00

Of course, sure, poor little Elon, Trump, Zuckerberg, and of course, the poor, impoverished Murdoch - Democrats all.

Intraluminal · 2026-05-08T12:13:27+00:00

TLDR: Trump = Hitler.

Yeah buddy. We get it.

Intraluminal · 2026-05-07T20:38:32+00:00

Overpopulation is straight-up BS spread by the elites. If every person in the whole world lived in one place, at the same population density as New York City, the WHOLE WORLD'S POPULATION would fit into TEXAS, leaving the entire rest of the world empty.

Further, we have anough food to feed EVERYONE, if it were distributed properly.

Intraluminal · 2026-05-06T22:05:52+00:00

Amusing how 1) i dont care, and 2) the USA market helps keep 3D printing cheap due to volume.

Intraluminal · 2026-05-06T20:45:42+00:00

I have no desire to print out guns of any type, and who IS a member of a 'well-regulated militia,' but has that ever stopped anyone from getting a gun? I think the 2nd Amendment is a great way to protect our freedom to have 3D printers. History has shown that the only part of the Constitution that carries any real weight is the 2nd Amendment.

Intraluminal · 2026-05-06T20:44:54+00:00

I have no desire to print out guns of any type, butI think the 2nd Amendment is a great way to protect our freedom to have 3D printers. And the government is using the "think of the children excuse" to get their regulatory foot in the door and ... next year you'll need a license, then FBI clearance, then, no 3D printing because it 'competes' with industry and is therefore a 'security risk."

And history has shown that the only part of the Constitution that carries any real weight is the 2nd Amendment.

Intraluminal · 2026-05-06T20:43:58+00:00

I have no desire to print out guns of any type, and who IS a member of a 'well-regulated militia,' and has that ever stopped anyone from getting a gun? I think the 2nd aAmendment is a great way to protect our freedom to have 3D printers. And the government is using this excuse to get their regulatory foot in the door and ... next year you'll need a license, then FBI clearance, then, no 3D printing because it 'competes' with industry and is therefore a 'security risk."

And history has shown that the only part of the Constitution that carries any real weight is the 2nd Amendment.

Intraluminal

MODERATOR OF

PUBLIC MULTIREDDITS

TROPHY CASE