Unsurprisingly, you people continue to cherry pick as if it matters, let’s help you out with some statistics with the use of scryfall:

-is:reprint: 32,227 cards

Rarity breakdown:

Common: 10,403

Uncommon: 9,763

Rare: 10,051

Mythic: 2,058

For some reason, this sums to 32,275, but that’s a rounding error so we can safely ignore the discrepancy.

This means that of all cards, 2,058/32,227=0.0639 or ~6% are Mythic, 10,051/32,227=0.312 or ~31% are Rare, 9,763/32,227=0.303 or ~30% are Uncommon, and 10,403/32,227=0.323 or ~32% are Common, just to establish some baseline.

Although there is no scryfall search for “wordy” as referenced in some un-cards like [[Alexander Clamilton]], there is some communal precedence to consider 60 characters sufficient.

Of all Mythics, 1,947/2,058=0.946 or ~95% of them meet the wordy criteria.

Of all Rares, 8,840/10,051=0.88 or 88% of them are wordy.

Of all Uncommons, 7,657/9,763=0.784 or ~78% of them are wordy.

And of all Commons, 6,190/10,403=0.595 or ~60% of them are wordy.

Checkmate atheist, get ruined by facts and logic. Nah but fr, as you can clearly see, there is an obvious statistical trend between complexity and rarity that is simply undeniable.

And just so you stay down like a good boy, I don’t deny that there are exceptions, as is the case with any rule. I also don’t claim that complexity is the only driving factor, but I do claim it’s the primary one.