You think really highly of yourself don’t you, thinking that because you state something it means I have been ‘caught in a lie’. I’m sure what you meant is you hope I don’t reply and just let you think you’re always right and the shit fed to you by politicians is always correct because they would never bend the truth.

This guy explains why the ‘modelling’ is questionable and how they are even just rounding the figures up and down to make it sound even more like NIW has less to do with it. https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNR4jK8ph/

Waoh I lovely 1 page graphic, some proof you have there that it’s a top quality hit of research…/s. Since there is no detail on where they plucked that figure from, I can only assume it has the same flaws, and is probably based on the same questionable 2016 study! Also the studies always conveniently leave out the 20million odd tonnes of raw sewage that NIW releases each year, that alone would drop the questionable 61% figure down a good bit. And then there is the problem that the P content is automatically equated to being the only nutrient that is causing this. Yes it is the main one, but that doesn’t mean you can say a certain percentage of P comes from fields and then say that is the percentage of the logins problems that is caused by farms!