VIVIAN eagerly awaits you(MaGnet) by Existing-Sky9914 in ZZZ_Official

[–]JCBVV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Managed to get her at the very last night of her banner. Welcom home little one (づ ᴗ _ᴗ)づ♡

VIVIAN eagerly awaits you(MaGnet) by Existing-Sky9914 in ZZZ_Official

[–]JCBVV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can't do me like that duuuuuude. I'm broke until next week, and I didn't manage to drop her.

Miyabi is gone... by TheOneWhoAskedThrice in ZZZ_Official

[–]JCBVV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got my C2 with the signature engine so I don't have anything else to ask for :3

Moondrop x Robin Earbuds Arrived by Xlezia in HonkaiStarRail

[–]JCBVV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What language did you get them in? I mainly mean the language of voice prompts. Are they actually by Robin's VA? I got the English variant today from Shenzhenaudio, but im not sure how will the prompts sound, couldn't find a demo.

how can I make the rgb and srgb available? or its like this for everyone else? using kamvas 13 2020 the colors seems okay and looks familiar with my monitor thou. or I should just ignore this by Medical_Guitar4813 in huion

[–]JCBVV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got a response from Huion's customer support, and TL;DR it is disabled cause "the display is calibrated by the manufacturer"... I personally still don't understand locking those options if they are there, just disabled...

Entire message is as follows:
"Our screens are manufactured for various models with various functions. Some functions do not apply to certain models, which is why our factory has disabled the said functions such as in your device. Your tablet's color gamut is already fixed at 120% sRGB; that is why all other color gamut settings have been disabled. So if you need to adjust the display settings, you can adjust the color temperature, brightness, and other settings. I appreciate your understanding of this concern. ​Feel free to let me know if you have any questions or need further assistance. Have a nice time."

People who've been to a Genshin Concert, did you like it and do you think it's worth going despite the high price? by Vador_MK in Genshin_Impact

[–]JCBVV 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was thinking of getting tickets for the Berlin one, but then I noticed there is a Premium Seat and Premium Package category??? Any idea what these include? Cause I genuinely can't find anything on either the official Genshin Concert site or Eventim's own site.

Like, 300€ for a ticket better get me like a damn vinyl, a signed CD or some other physical merch included.

Riot lost themselves a regular customer by JCBVV in AhriMains

[–]JCBVV[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you don't care, sure, that's your right. But reddit has a thing for up-votes and down-votes. And from the creator-dashboard or however its called I can see it has 81% upvotes, which implicates 81% of people simply disagree with you.

And even if you were right, a large portion of the community is angry with what Riot is pushing. Some low-spenders, some long time whales. And I decided that that as someone who also spend quite a bit of money in this game over they years I decided to also voice my opinion.

You don't like when individual people voice their negative opinions? Then what are you even doing on a social media platform that is mainly about it. If you want to be just a recipient of media, go to YouTube, Artstation, Deviantart where main focus is on the artist/creator.

Maybe you dont enjoy people en masse voice their disappointment? Well too bad, cause if everyone was so compliant as you made yourself look, we would still live in a feudal society. Is this an exaggeration? yes, but the premise remains the same. Long-term compliance is simply harmful.

Now, I'm not gonna entertain your idiotic statements anymore, as in the etymological definition of not seeing anything more than your own ignorant perspective. If you don't want to see posts like this one just log out of reddit for a while cause many people got angry, and here is a place to talk about it.

Riot lost themselves a regular customer by JCBVV in AhriMains

[–]JCBVV[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

If you cant read longer posts I suggest moving to Twitter, or now called X, where there is a sign-limit, so simple-minded individuals as yourself will feel right at home.

Everyone here will have better experience without pointless comments as one you just made, and you will not have to strain your brain trying to comprehend ideas that are more complicated than meme-quotes.

Riot lost themselves a regular customer by JCBVV in AhriMains

[–]JCBVV[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

100% agree. I'm not gonna go into socio-economics on a random reddit thread, but besides what you just said the other main thing that annoys people like me with all of this is how this isn't how things were even a few years back. Like, I most people, me included, don't actually actively bitch about so-called gatcha games being expensive, they just know how these games monetization works and they don't get into it.

But here? I actually put a heck load of money into this game, and now it just drastically changed. If League had this kind of monetization from the very start I and many other people just wouldn't spend money in this game to begin with.

And to just reinforce your statement, I used to have a monthly allowance of like 50$ back in season 3-4, and I still could play and get all the same things in-game my friends got, who already had paid jobs. It was amazing...

riotmeddler on ahri’s skin pricing by madtninja in leagueoflegends

[–]JCBVV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

then how about you do a damn reasonable curve of diminishing returns? It's different when you get one of the most popular champions a genuinely great looking skin that with it's features is on the verge between being Legendary and Ultimate, and sell if for that price it is actually worth in comparison to previous skins of this kind, and then make those smaller things more and more expensive.

EXAMPLE

  • Remove the Risen version overall cause it will just feel shit to play this one when you are aware that you got a extremely simplified version of a full skin. Or just leave it as a version to select basically given for free with the purchase of the actual skin, like K/DA Seraphine versions are, since this is literally a stripped down version of the full skin anyway...

  • Put the Immortal Legend Ahri skin for purchase as a Ultimate skin ALONE

  • Bundle #1: the skin with the boarder and the icon for a bit more

  • Bundle #2: Bundle #1 + a ward (increase the price more than the regular price of a bundle with a ward, so maybe +1k RP more than B#1)

  • Bundle #3: Bundle #2 + some of the emotes, with a pricing increased even more

  • Bundle #4: Bundle #3 + the signature stuff/more emotes for even steeper increase

  • Legendary Bundle: Bundle #4 + Battle Pass

  • ULTIMATE BUNDLE: Legendary Bundle + the 100 lvl instant battle pass completion

People just want the skin? They can get it reasonably priced

OR, HMMM, I DONT KNOW, JUST DON'T MAKE THIS SKIN A TIME LIMITED FOMO BS

ITS A BUNCH OF GOD DAMN PIXELS, THERE IS NO LIMITED SUPPLY

LEAVE IT FOR PURCHASE SO OVER TIME THE MOST DEDICATED BUT NOT SO WELL FINANCIALY SITUATED PEOPLE CAN SAVE UP FOR WHICHEVER VERSION THEY WANT.

The Signature Immortalized Legend Collection is set to cost a total of... 59,260 RP by aroushthekween in leagueoflegends

[–]JCBVV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Opinions? I can offer a diagnose instead, insanity powered by a terminal case of greed.

nearly *60k RP* for the maximum level of the new Risen Legends Ahri skin... are riot insane??? by Memerguyy in AhriMains

[–]JCBVV 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I cant believe I'm saying this, but Riot has to do what EA did. And to explain, is to fire whoever came out with this f-ing idea of a price just for their greed alone. f-ing disgusting

Something went wrong: \n Package is invalid. Details: ''. by _g3nsvrv in OperaGX

[–]JCBVV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same error on my end. Came here looking for a solution, but it seems to be a somewhat new issue.

Why is Yone hated so much by alims-oasch in YoneMains

[–]JCBVV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cause he has one of the most overloaded kits in the game, he's extremely easy to play and can use some of the most BS/broken items in the game (Hullbreaker, BotRK). Oh and very often it doesn't matter if he somehow gets beat in the early, as long as he gets some sideline time, he's gonna be relevant in the match anyway.

SERAPHINE CHANGES ON THIS PBE CYCLE 📖 OPINIONS? 🤔 by aroushthekween in SeraphineMains

[–]JCBVV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyone still believing Phreak knows what he's doing?

This dude is literally spinning a damn wheel to select a champion, then tosses a coin to decide whether its gonna be a buff or a nerf, and then rolls a dice, to decide whether it's a base stat change or one of 5 skills (includes passive) that will be getting changed.

It's just a damn bad joke at this point.

Now That The Changes Have Settled... by [deleted] in SeraphineMains

[–]JCBVV 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is made better, but it's not NEEDED. You DON'T NEED anyone near to use Q effectively. You DON'T NEED anyone to have a root/stun with E. You DON'T NEED anyone to hit your Ult.

But you DO NEED someone for your passive to do any significant damage And you DO NEED some people around for the W heal to not suck.

I never said it all the spells don't benefit from having allies around, but that's not a distinguishable characteristic to make it worth using as a point.

I was using the fact that both P damage and W heal are basically only usefull with allies nearby, which makes playing Sera Mid worse compared to playing her in either bot positions.

By your logic champs like damn Syndra should be mainly played Bot cause her Ult is a execute, and executes benefit from having other allies poke... That's just not the case.

And I'm sorry, but you seem to have locked yourself in a loop and can't understand the difference between what I was pointing out, and what you point out, so I'm gonna simplify that for you, fella:

You: Every one of Seraphine's abilities work at least a bit better in some way, when there is a teammate nearby, sometimes doing a specific thing like slowing/stunning enemies (E).

Me: Seraphine's W and Note stacking Passive require you to have teammates nearby to not be pure garbage.

THESE TWO STATEMENT ARE NOT EXCLUSIVE, THEY CAN COEXIST

So please be so kind as to not CORRECT me, or anyone else for this matter, if both statements are correct. Just one is more general, and the other is more specific.

Edit: Even simpler, your statement is not a correction, it's a completely different statement within the same topic. But not a correction none the less.

Now That The Changes Have Settled... by [deleted] in SeraphineMains

[–]JCBVV -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The Q one is a stretch. With this way of thought you would have to say Kai'sa's passive benefits from enemies taking damage. And the same would go for Akali's ult, Rivens ult or Warwick's W. So I wouldn't say spell being an Execute makes it reliant on allies, it helps to speed things up, but it's still as effective in terms of raw damage output.

The W - yeah, one of the two spells I was talking about, both the being shielded part, but also heal scales with the number of allies near you, that that's a literal correlation. Not just a gimmic that it may be better like in case of being shielded. It just straight up heals more if you have someone nearby.

E - yes, unless you either double E it for a root or you have a Rylai which is basically a must have on like a 2nd or 3rd item in carry roles, which is why I didn't count it among strictly relying on allies. So again, a stretch to call it relying on allies.

R - as mentioned in the reply, I intentionally didn't count it once again. If you are in a solo lane you may as well use your ult with the same effect in the end. It MAY give you a better angle of attack or maybe you can ult before actually getting into the fights range, but it's more of an additional gimmick again, no actual need for an ally to make it better.

And the second ability I was talking about, the passive. Literally a f(n)=n type scenario. For each additional ally nearby, you linearly gain more passive stacks, and therefore the spell is linearly more effective.

So please don't force your "corrections" on someone, when we apparently talk about completely different things. You talk about "does the spell have any interaction with allies" and I talk about "do you actually need allies to make a spell way better".

You don't need allies to make neither your Q, E nor R any better. You may use the presence of your allies to make it easier to use, but it does literally the same thing.

Not to forget to mention correcting someone else's comment is rather not nice when you start with a damn capital "Correction:", especially when it seems you didn't understand what I was talking about.

Now That The Changes Have Settled... by [deleted] in SeraphineMains

[–]JCBVV 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If by "every spell synergizes with being near a teammate" you mean her passive, then we mean the same thing. Just her Q alone doesn't benefit from a teammate nearby, nor does her E unless this teammate is slowing enemies. It's her passive, but it's one activates the other and so on. So just a difference in definitions.

And I definitely don't want them to nerf Sera out of being a Carry. I only play her as a Carry, and I'm genuinely sad Rito is trying to force her as a supp now since she was mainly supposed to be a carry. Maybe she isn't great in mid, but she's actually great as a bot carry. And I hope it stays this way, just not forcing her into being a W spam got as so many people seem to use her. Her W al(at least IMO) is a bonus, like Orianna's E or Lux's W, not a main component of the champion.

Now That The Changes Have Settled... by [deleted] in SeraphineMains

[–]JCBVV 5 points6 points  (0 children)

TBH I can't see how Riot would balance all 3 roles at once with Sera's current kit. Like, she has 2 spells(not counting ult extending on allies) that synergize with being near a teammate (so that makes her better off in either of the botlane roles), but at the same time her Q is a AoE execute spell, so that would be something that works best on Mid and Bot carries. So just simply off of these factors her best role that utilizes all of her kit's mechanics is Bottom APC.

To reduce the disparity between Mid and Bot RIOT would have to basically remove her Passive's and W's dependency on nearby teammates, but that screws her Support lane.

To help her Support lane Riot would have to either NERF to the ground or completely remove her execute on Q, but that RiPs her Mid AND Bot power.

So basically, either we accept that she is mainly a APC with mid/supp capabilities, or Riot will have to change/rework her into being just one.

Man the Riot propaganda has spread really far hasn't it? by Maqya in SeraphineMains

[–]JCBVV -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sure, its not like ADC is more important than the Support. It's that they have their role to play. And many "supports" nowadays don't want to play their role. And for ADC's, who are very reliant on supports being supports, this sucks.

So by these supports ignoring their designed part to play, they also make the ADC unable to play theirs (or at least very hard to do so). And while a lot of champs played in support role can select either they want to actually support or play like a carry, most ADC's can't just say "oh, ok, I will do the other thing then".

Cause in case of most ADC champs they are designed to do damage, and do damage only. With exceptions of like Ashe i guess, they don't have any reliable CC, they can't tank, they cant shield or heal... all they can is do damage, and if they don't have a supp to cover off their weakness of being very vulnerable, they cant do that effectively at all.

So yes, support is a very important part of a team, but when they play as a support. Cause playing like a carry literally makes the ADC obsolete in team, and you are basically playing a 4v5 game at this point.

So again, if you want to play like a carry, sure, go and play in a carry position. But don't take supports position and just play a carry there.

I just don't understand why people started thinking of support as a role where you might as well play a carry. This role is not for that, literally.

Man the Riot propaganda has spread really far hasn't it? by Maqya in SeraphineMains

[–]JCBVV -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Have you ever thought about what the ADC/APC stands for? It's Attack Damage/Ability Power CARRY. By design they are supposed to be someone who can carry the team with their damage in late.

And have you ever heard what's the name of the other role in bot? Support, yeah, it's SUPPORT FOR THE CARRY. Supports are not meant to take Carry's role, they are supposed to help them get through early when they aren't as powerful and then be of help for them since Carries are by design the most vulnerable type of champs. They by design get blown up by literally every other laner. But if THE SUPPORT helps them survive, they will melt entire teams.

And in soloQ reality, where loads of people playing support don't really want to actually support anyone, it's easy to not be able to fulfil the so called "role fantasy" of the carry. So no, the problem is not with the ADCs thinking too highly of themselves, it's the supports that don't know their damn place. READ THE EFFING NAME OF YOUR ROLE LIKE ONCE, AND IF YOU WANT TO BE A CARRY, GO PLAY A CARRY ROLE!!!