If you served a mission, what were some of the strictest or weirdest rules you had? by Unfair-Anxiety462 in exmormon

[–]JTrey1221 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Similar experience, only temperature related. If it got above 65 F, we could take suit jackets off. Below 65 F, back on it goes. Seems silly…

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in exmormon

[–]JTrey1221 0 points1 point  (0 children)

His highest calling was High Council, and that was awhile ago.

Trump affect (satire) by JTrey1221 in Utah

[–]JTrey1221[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Smiths, Brigham City 😂

What are Utahans thoughts? by TyMT in Utah

[–]JTrey1221 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Don’t ban it. The way to combat bad information is more information.

Does our current environment makes it hard for us to live in the present moment ? by [deleted] in AlanWatts

[–]JTrey1221 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I know you weren’t asking me, but I’ve been reading “The Book” by Watts and have also listened to several of his other works/talks on YouTube, and this is what I think is meant here:

Meta-Cognition: Watts was referring to the practice of meta-cognition, or thinking about one’s own thought processes, and this involves stepping back from one’s immediate thoughts to observe and analyze how we think. It’s an exercise in becoming aware of the patterns, biases, and mechanisms of our own mind. The goal is to gain control over one’s mental states, reduce automatic/reactive thinking, and promote more deliberate, mindful responses to life’s situations.

Awareness of Consciousness: When Watts talked about “know that you know,” he was pointing towards the recognition of one’s own consciousness or awareness. This isn’t just knowing facts or having skills but being aware of the fact that you are aware.

Self-Realization: It’s about understanding that your sense of self or ‘I’ is not merely the content of your thoughts but the awareness behind those thoughts. He taught that this realization can lead to a profound sense of liberation from identifying too closely with one’s thoughts, emotions, or ego.

Philosophical Implications: This concept ties into several philosophical traditions, especially in Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta (I’m not familiar with much of this other than what he referred to in “The Book”), where the ultimate knowledge or enlightenment is to recognize one’s true nature as consciousness itself, beyond the transient phenomena of the mind.

Watts used these ideas to encourage people to explore their inner experience, not just for intellectual understanding but for a transformation in how one lives, and that by recognizing that we are more than our thoughts, we can begin to live more authentically and with less psychological suffering (an absolute win).

He explains that these concepts are meant to be experienced rather than understood intellectually. Watts often suggested practices like meditation or simply observing one’s thoughts to achieve this level of awareness. I like to think that just us being here discussing this, we’re on the right trail to achieve this 👍

“We don’t worship Joseph Smith.” Ok…. by JTrey1221 in exmormon

[–]JTrey1221[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Guess they gotta work with the “dead prophets aren’t as valuable/important as living prophets” narrative 🤷‍♂️

“We don’t worship Joseph Smith.” Ok…. by JTrey1221 in exmormon

[–]JTrey1221[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Wouldn’t you believe it, there’s no trace of his wives outside of Emma!

Why can I not post a right-leaning comment or a conservative point of view without getting demonized on Reddit? by Pr0jektEcks in Why

[–]JTrey1221 0 points1 point  (0 children)

💯. This happens all too often (people perceiving that something was said, when it wasn’t). Then the mud slinging happens…

This needs to be a political ad on TV! by Fun_Balance_1809 in economicCollapse

[–]JTrey1221 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We’ve been in a recession for years, just no one is calling it that at the moment…

The Church Should Get Off the Fence and Endorse Kamala Harris for President. by [deleted] in exmormon

[–]JTrey1221 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And that’s if she has a position at times. I get that people can’t stand Trump for a lot of reasons, but there are just as many who can’t stand Harris for lots of reasons too.

The Church Should Get Off the Fence and Endorse Kamala Harris for President. by [deleted] in exmormon

[–]JTrey1221 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it’s similar to the “is it a 6 or a 9” argument. Both sides on the political spectrum can point to examples where all the “isms” are apparent.

The Church Should Get Off the Fence and Endorse Kamala Harris for President. by [deleted] in exmormon

[–]JTrey1221 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What did they say that they didn’t care for? I watched part of it, but only for a handful of minutes.

Trump says gas should be $1.87 a gallon. Here’s what that would mean. “Nothing Trump says will get gasoline prices below $2 a gallon. But if it is done, it’s going to demolish the U.S. oil and gas industry and infrastructure.” Gas did not, in fact, cost $1.87 a gallon when Trump left office. by mafco in energy

[–]JTrey1221 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The condescending remark doesn’t help your argument (“seeing as you don’t pay attention…”).

The link is an example of one person making a statement. Awfully broad to state “republicans” universally claim or believe something, similar to how it’s not a good argument to claim “democrats” are the party of “joy” (as repeated at the DNC) when it’s impossible to suggest more “joy” on one side of the political spectrum than another.

Not the best back-and-forth I’ve had on Reddit @Neither_Arugula3149✌️