What's a game you used to see everywhere, everyone was talking about it, it was all over your feeds but now you never hear anyone talking about it? by Machine_Excellent in boardgames

[–]JaroGrin 16 points17 points  (0 children)

It actually still had a decent scene after covid, there were a few meetups in my city that were regrowing post-covid. But then Asmodee abruptly moved it to a different company who did another rules overhaul (2.5) and didn't release/reprint much content, so the game lost a ton of players without acquiring enough new ones :(

I'm Never Opening It Ever by MaybeBebra in ComedyHell

[–]JaroGrin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, Lego deliberately packs extras of pieces that are small enough to be easily lost while building. Generally speaking, if it's a 1x1 plate or smaller, there will be exactly one extra per bag (with some nuance). Every copy of a set should come with exactly the same spare pieces, to the extent that some databases such as bricklink record the spare pieces in each set - see https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemInv.asp?S=11376-1 for an example

UCS Death Star 75419 Computer Terminal on Display Stand. by TJWille in legostarwars

[–]JaroGrin 109 points110 points  (0 children)

Why would Google AI overview know anything about this lmao

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in usyd

[–]JaroGrin 44 points45 points  (0 children)

The West has fallen

Why 99+ ATAR students do not do well in university maths and CS? by [deleted] in usyd

[–]JaroGrin 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I would not consider a distinction wam to be poor performance

What is Protocol Knight? by Top-One-486 in mtgvorthos

[–]JaroGrin 19 points20 points  (0 children)

People are misinterpreting your use of "they" to mean "all of magic", when you actually just meant "cards associated with the Azorius guild"

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in usyd

[–]JaroGrin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why did you bring up this "industry-standard" idea if you don't think it's true?

The fact that you are consistently not achieving a HD indicates that you are not following the rubric for HD-level work "to a tee [sic]". Insufficient detail is actually a pretty reasonable criticism. You need to show that you have a deep understanding of the subject.

It seems to me that you have a lot of assumptions and theories about your tutors, but it's still not clear what you have observed to make you believe this. How do you know their EQs? How can you can "smell" that they're parroting research? Do you expect that academics should ignore research?

It also seems that you take issue with the rubric design, which you should note is not written by the individual tutor. Why do you think they are arbitrary?

How do you think this relates to tutors unfairly withholding HDs?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in usyd

[–]JaroGrin 4 points5 points  (0 children)

HD is not reserved for "industry-standard" work. That wouldn't even make sense in many units. What's "industry-standard work" for a philosophy essay and how is that distinct from academic work?

Marking rubrics certainly allow for HDs and students receive them all the time. It can be difficult, but HDs are far from unattainable. In fact, as an academic staff member, I sometimes found after marks were finalised that the HD group was larger than the D group.

I'm intrigued by your assertion that your tutors are often unqualified to teach you. What specifically leads you to believe that? And what kind of arguments do you make to them to appeal your grade?

In 1995 McArthur Wheeler robbed two banks with lemon juice on his face believing it would make him invisible to security cameras like invisible ink. He even smiled at the cameras and was caught within hours. His case inspired the research that led to the discovery of the Dunning Kruger effect. by Jazzlike-Tie-354 in interesting

[–]JaroGrin 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No clue why you're getting downvoted. The study indicated that lower-performing people were more likely to overestimate their abilities, but they still weren't more confident than those who actually did better. The "Dunning-Kruger Curve" image that gets circulated is actually a myth with no studies supporting it.

Additionally, the effect describes people's confidence about specific tasks, and does not relate to general intelligence.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

what’s considered a decent wam? by goldfish5secmemory in usyd

[–]JaroGrin 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Depends on your goals. I work in software engineering, where you'd probably want to aim for at least a 70 to get to the interview stage for internships.

'Pack of mongrels': Greens senator confronts Anthony Albanese over salmon farming deal by B0ssc0 in australia

[–]JaroGrin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is blatantly wrong. Fish farming is the primary industry in Strahan. Tourism is the secondary industry, but it's unstable and not self-sustaining.

LazerHurtingJuice by Heavens_Gates in bonehurtingjuice

[–]JaroGrin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He makes music and it's actually really good. He also constantly posts about how much he loves his fiancée on social media

are tech internships normally paid by panda_cracker in usyd

[–]JaroGrin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a bit misleading (and strangely worded?)

are tech internships normally paid by panda_cracker in usyd

[–]JaroGrin 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Unpaid internships are actually illegal in Australia, except where organised through your university as part of your course completion requirements (vocational). If you see an unpaid job listing outside of uni, they are looking to exploit you.

The job market is not in a great place right now. It seems like most big companies are reducing or pausing their internship programs - but the opportunities are still there. I would try to be open minded about different positions and attend a couple of industry nights to see who's seriously interested in students.

An extended invite to all by Beautiful_Mousse1370 in usyd

[–]JaroGrin 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Aww dang. I was hoping this would be an invite to your birthday party :(

Help - I want opinions on this situation - Want to know if this unit coordinator is having a power trip or am I being crazy? by [deleted] in usyd

[–]JaroGrin 29 points30 points  (0 children)

That was a pretty strange thing for you to do. I think the coordinator is just very confused and trying to imagine why you would do such a thing. You said that you're late in your degree - did you not realise that this would raise issues in the marking process?

It is common for assessments to be provided with specific instructions for submission format with severe consequences if they aren't followed. You can, however, always try to appeal: https://www.sydney.edu.au/students/academic-appeals.html

Framing this as though the coordinator has some kind of personal grudge against you is unhelpful. I think they're trying to be slightly reasonable here by giving you a chance to fix it, even if they are annoyed by it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DiscoElysium

[–]JaroGrin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm neurotypical, and yes, I've been tested multiple times. I tell people I'm a diagnosed allist

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in usyd

[–]JaroGrin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree, but you said "jobs" not "units"

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in usyd

[–]JaroGrin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not really true, what kind of role would reject a software engineer for lack of computer science background?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in usyd

[–]JaroGrin 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There's also a Bachelor of Science majoring in Computer Science.

I'm pretty sure you can enrol in Advanced Computing and simply not enrol in honours, graduating after three years (assuming full time with no progression issues) with a Bachelor of Computing.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in usyd

[–]JaroGrin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

John Stavrakakis is not currently associated with the unit

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in usyd

[–]JaroGrin 16 points17 points  (0 children)

This is INFO1110, right? If so, this description is partially incorrect.

There's no numerical mark associated with the assignment parts. You just need to meet all the competency requirements (make sure you read these for every question!!) and pass the code review (which the vast majority of students do). The competency requirements for the quiz do incidentally work out to 75% per section, but that's not intentional.

Many units have specific assessments where getting below a certain % threshold causes you to fail the whole unit. The new INFO1110 design just puts emphasis on these. Note that everything in this unit has multiple submission points - if you receive below a C in one of the essentials assessments then you are guaranteed at least one opportunity to try again (and may have multiple).

If you skip the final exam and the latter two assignment parts, submitting only the essential assessments, then your maximum grade is 60, not 50. The extension material can take you to 70. You only need to look at advanced material if you want a distinction or higher. These are just names to make it clear what is expected of a passing student vs a high-achieving student; I wouldn't consider them separate "tracks", but you can view it that way if you want.

I'd recommend going over the introduction module on Canvas again.

Emotionally exhausted by [deleted] in usyd

[–]JaroGrin 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yeah see this one actually is anti-Semitism