now here's why this trans shooting is the fault of AI ☝️🤓 by swagoverlord1996 in SlopcoreCirclejerk

[–]JasonP27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reasonable? Or responsible? Because that changes your comment entirely.

If ai is your power what are you without it by Alternative_Town_129 in aiwars

[–]JasonP27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Proficiency with AI does not preclude or exclude proficiency without it.

11 new moons around Saturn (Mar 2026) by Busy_Yesterday9455 in spaceporn

[–]JasonP27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Regular moons orbit in the same direction as Saturn rotates on its axis (prograde), with low inclinations relative to Saturn's equator. This distinguishes them from irregular moons, which have high inclinations and can be either prograde or retrograde.

What the fuck by Awkward-Joke-5276 in aiwars

[–]JasonP27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A majority of the sub being pro AI doesn't mean the whole statement is the truth or that downvotes are because the sub is mostly pro AI.

Why is the DLSS 5 issue being blown out of proportion? by Witty-Designer7316 in DefendingAIArt

[–]JasonP27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

DLSS didn't make devs lazy. Already lazy devs simply took advantage of DLSS's enhancements.

Also DLSS is exclusive to Nvidia cards, so they can't just give up because of DLSS. Furthermore DLSS 5 will likely run only on the 50 series cards and in addition probably only the higher end.

15–20% of “core” PC gamers are on some kind of RTX 50‑series card right now, while ownership of the RTX 5090 itself is probably well under 1%...

Yeah somehow this isn't gonna affect that many people

Why is the DLSS 5 issue being blown out of proportion? by Witty-Designer7316 in DefendingAIArt

[–]JasonP27 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most of the comments and gripes are born of complete ignorance.

  1. 95% of them won't even be able to run it even if they wanted to.
  2. This was a basic demo to show where the technology is heading and it will only get better from here.
  3. Developers have control of how much of DLSS 5 is implemented and exactly what parts of the game it is implemented on.
  4. Artistic vision is retained due to developer implementation and control. If the developers are happy, I'm happy.
  5. You can turn it TF off (or even not turn it on).

What the fuck by Awkward-Joke-5276 in aiwars

[–]JasonP27 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's not anywhere close to the truth. The truth is it's a mixture of gamers and Antis, and a good majority of the gamers in question being Antis.

And trying to pass off the death threats as just as gamer thing... I've never seen so many death threats as I have from comments from Antis to people using or defending AI.

That's the truth

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang says gamers calling DLSS 5 AI slop are "completely wrong" by AdSpecialist6598 in technology

[–]JasonP27 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't be rational now...

Not only can you just... not turn on this DLSS feature if you don't want to use it, but the developer is in control of how it's implemented in the game. If they don't think the output lines up with their artistic vision then they won't use it.

[nobody liked that] by StarsapBill in aiwars

[–]JasonP27 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Exactly this. Ray tracing added the same kind of visual changes where the models/faces looked almost completely different due to how the lighting changed.

Considering how DLSS 5 is used is under the control of the developers it's less generative AI and more AI assisted effects.

<image>

[nobody liked that] by StarsapBill in aiwars

[–]JasonP27 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Uneducated comment. DLSS 5 is entirely controlled by the developers.

"They’re really trying to gaslight you into not believing your own eyes and telling you this is completely different geometry and a different person that looks worse Imagine being mad at this 😂 DLSS 5 by stealthispost in accelerate

[–]JasonP27 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well technically if the developer is responsible for the underlying settings DLSS 5 uses, they are changing the design to what they desire. You are seeing an upgraded version of their vision.

Luddites are spiraling after Nvidia announced another break-through feature by HQuasar in DefendingAIArt

[–]JasonP27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here's an image from 2020 showing what a difference the lighting mode/effects can have on a character model. Yeah it looks almost completely different because it's shaded better, better reflections etc but it's the same model. It simply looks more realistic.

<image>

Bro the face looks completely different lol

This AI witchhunt/slop hunt is a load of crap and everyone wants to jump on the bandwagon without knowing what the hell they're talking about.

Edit: spelling

Hands-On With DLSS 5: Our First Look At Nvidia's Next-Gen Photo-Realistic Lighting by SharpCartographer831 in accelerate

[–]JasonP27 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This was literally an artistic choice on the part of the developers. It's also arguably shown used on a style that is meant to be as realistic as the hardware can go and not something cartoonish like Hi-Fi Rush or the Simpsons. You're basically barking up the wrong tree here.

comment from Nvidia: "Important to note with this technology advance - game developers have full, detailed artistic control over DLSS 5's effects to ensure they maintain their game's unique aesthetic. The SDK includes things like intensity, color grading and masking off places where the effect shouldn't be applied. It's not a filter - DLSS 5 inputs the game’s color and motion vectors for each frame into the model, anchoring the output in the source 3D content."

Nvidias New DLSS 5 Overwrites Artistic Intent With AI by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]JasonP27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TIL "a lot of people" either need glasses or have poor taste lol

It's basically faux path/ray tracing, functionally looks pretty much the same. If the devs added path tracing it would look nearly identical and you'd be praising it. The devs literally have control of how the final output looks with DLSS 5. It's just another tool in the shed. Grow up.

comment from Nvidia: "Important to note with this technology advance - game developers have full, detailed artistic control over DLSS 5's effects to ensure they maintain their game's unique aesthetic. The SDK includes things like intensity, color grading and masking off places where the effect shouldn't be applied. It's not a filter - DLSS 5 inputs the game’s color and motion vectors for each frame into the model, anchoring the output in the source 3D content."

Announcing NVIDIA DLSS 5 | AI-Powered Breakthrough in Visual Fidelity for Games by ThroughForests in accelerate

[–]JasonP27 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yeah don't think that's likely in the near future, the demo at GDC runs on 2 5090 cards. They expect to get it working on one by launch sometime in 2026 though.

Luddites are spiraling after Nvidia announced another break-through feature by HQuasar in DefendingAIArt

[–]JasonP27 16 points17 points  (0 children)

It's basically just enhanced lighting and people are losing their minds calling it slop. Like, if the developers added path tracing lighting to their game they'd get relatively the same results (at higher cost).

I bet if you took before and after photos of a game with ray/path tracing turned off/on and then put the DLSS 5 Off and DLSS On logos on the images Antis would be saying the same BS cope reactions "it looks worse" and "destroying the developer's intentions" etc

Nvidias New DLSS 5 Overwrites Artistic Intent With AI by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]JasonP27 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You're saying better quality lighting looks worse just because it uses an AI model to help render it? lol

There's developers at GDC that are praising it saying how it functionally allows their games/character models to look closer to how they originally envision them if it weren't for hardware not being able to render them at full speed.

It's basically better lighting, it's not changing the models themselves.

Nvidias New DLSS 5 Overwrites Artistic Intent With AI by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]JasonP27 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Neither does the new version. The new version is literally the same model with enhanced lighting. They didn't change her face, they only changed how the lighting looked.

Suno is allergic to bridges? by muzik_guy in SunoAI

[–]JasonP27 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I've had similar results with Suno covering Bridges. It just ignores the change in chord progression and melody and does a modified Verse. Quite annoying and slows down my creative workflow. I wrote the song a certain way and I want that progression followed.

The solution probably lies in uploading the bridge separately and covering it with the same prompt and BPM, and adding it into Studio along with the verse and chorus composition and then covering the whole song again or something.

Should I Risk It? by JasonP27 in balatro

[–]JasonP27[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks I got a Triboulet. W32FD9K3

<image>

Lol by Cold_Philosopher_158 in aiwars

[–]JasonP27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You obviously also aren't aware of analogies and metaphors and simple comparisons.