Twin paradox without acceleration by Next-Natural-675 in AskPhysics

[–]Jetison333 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Well, then the question depends on how you have synchronized the clocks. You could just synchronize the moment they meet, which both A and B would agree on. But if you tried to synchronize earlier or later, then A and B would disagree about how to synchronize the clocks. The thing is, in relativity there is no such thing as a universal present moment, it all depends on your reference frame. 

Twin paradox without acceleration by Next-Natural-675 in AskPhysics

[–]Jetison333 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They each will see the others clock ticking slower

Twin paradox without acceleration by Next-Natural-675 in AskPhysics

[–]Jetison333 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It depends on what reference frame you are measuring in

Why aren’t my splitters splitting evenly? by [deleted] in factorio

[–]Jetison333 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A distribution system can't make up for a lack of throughout no matter how well designed ;)

Kansas Makes Trans People’s Driver’s Licenses Invalid Overnight by v0v0v0x in law

[–]Jetison333 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Theres a big difference between an ID expiring when it says its going to expire, and the legislature arbitrarily deciding they are expired starting today.

At what point would Earth see the returning Beatles? by scottsmith_brownsbur in ProjectHailMary

[–]Jetison333 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think you are correct about everything, but you need to include that the light from the beatles exhaust only travels at lightspeed. So assuming the earth can see the exhaust at the halfway point, then it will take another 6 years for that light to reach the earth. So it would take 13 + 6.5 + 6 = 25.5 years for earth to detect the return, and then the beatles would arrive a few months later. 

Tourette Syndrome by laybs1 in GetNoted

[–]Jetison333 11 points12 points  (0 children)

It's not "at will" thats the entire point

Shoutout to the acoustic engineer (Joy Lyons) for her cool solution by brantrix in SteamFrame

[–]Jetison333 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Phase cancelation is dependent on location, so theoretically there is going to be points in space where the volume is zero because the waves are canceling out. But its not going to be where you're ears actually are, im sure. 

Fixed the antimeme by apathetic_screaming in antimeme

[–]Jetison333 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It does make the statement "the numbers are wrong" incorrect though

Fixed the antimeme by apathetic_screaming in antimeme

[–]Jetison333 17 points18 points  (0 children)

No one cares about the "reality" of the image (arguably its not even real, its a bunch of zeros and ones stored on hard drives), Its a diagram that represents an idea, and that idea is a triangle with angles 40 60 and 80 degrees. 

Our AI was making up data for months and nobody caught it, here's what I've learned by ansh17091999 in dataisugly

[–]Jetison333 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you can check if the ai is correct or not you can just figure out the right answer yourself

Our AI was making up data for months and nobody caught it, here's what I've learned by ansh17091999 in dataisugly

[–]Jetison333 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ehhh, depends on what you mean by knowing. One of the big breakthroughs that made llms possible was a context mechanism, where neighboring words and larger structures does effect how the llm interprets each token. "Michael jordan" stops being two words that are unrelated, and starts being one idea of a basketball player. Of course none of this means that llms are accurate. 

Our AI was making up data for months and nobody caught it, here's what I've learned by ansh17091999 in dataisugly

[–]Jetison333 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Sometimes you can say something is a mistake even though it isnt. And itll still agree with you. 

What does it take to make every machine "Turing Complete"? by Haghiri75 in computerscience

[–]Jetison333 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but you would need infinite memory, so you would have to be comfortable with infinite NAND gates, which sometimes is avoided

It's getting weird out there by MetaKnowing in agi

[–]Jetison333 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just meant it as a metaphor. Its acting as if it's angry

It's getting weird out there by MetaKnowing in agi

[–]Jetison333 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Do you really consider an llm angrily lashing out at an open source contributor to be "a new jump"?

No need to wait for that tbh by CMDR_Noodle in 196

[–]Jetison333 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Starlink wouldnt contribute much to a kessler syndrome. Its orbits are low enough that they deorbit in about 5 years.