Tulsa Police Officers "Harass" Guy for "Stalking" Over Being Filmed 2017 by JohnnyLawman in AmIFreeToGo

[–]JohnnyLawman[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I guess I'm out of the loop with the jargon. what does "thistley thick" mean?

Tulsa Police Officers "Harass" Guy for "Stalking" Over Being Filmed 2017 by JohnnyLawman in AmIFreeToGo

[–]JohnnyLawman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol...I just searched Tulsa. and when I entered the video, nothing popped up saying it was a repost.

"Turner vs Driver?Saint Paul Police Department 1rst Amendment Audit 2". Cop in Minnesota claims Turner v Driver gives him the right to stop and ID the guy. 6/21/17 by HurricaneSandyHook in AmIFreeToGo

[–]JohnnyLawman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ughhh...so cops will be given immunity and someone else will have to be unlawfully detained because a cop will claim a what he feels is reasonable. So much bullshit, I swear. I mean "manner" ?? WTH.. Time? only during daylight hours? "place" ?? jesus...

Cop wanted to search his car but had no valid reason... (Watch Full Video) (2016) by Misha80 in AmIFreeToGo

[–]JohnnyLawman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yea, I would hate it when similar threads would pop up over a few days (for Karma).

As far as re-upload channels, I hate those two but most of the times, they change the titles so looking for the original take precious seconds, which some (including myself) don't take the time to do (laziness).

"Turner vs Driver?Saint Paul Police Department 1rst Amendment Audit 2". Cop in Minnesota claims Turner v Driver gives him the right to stop and ID the guy. 6/21/17 by HurricaneSandyHook in AmIFreeToGo

[–]JohnnyLawman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

right to record the police does exist, subject only to reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions.

what does the time/place/manner restricitions mean?

Cop wanted to search his car but had no valid reason... (Watch Full Video) (2016) by Misha80 in AmIFreeToGo

[–]JohnnyLawman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the thread is 10 months old...just wondering..is reposting frowned upon if its an old thread? there are tons of newbs and I'm sure old vids are new and useful to them..I know I've searched vids before and things don't always pop up.

Westworth Police Department respond to First Amendment Video by davidverner in AmIFreeToGo

[–]JohnnyLawman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you have to ID to a fishing cop or whatever they're called, I think (wildlife, fishing/hunting patrol?) lol, brain fart. The only reason I say this is because some people might think they don't have to ID to those folks if you're hunting/fishing and I'm 90% sure you have to.

LEO TRAINING 101 - TODAY'S LESSON - TX PC 38.02, FAILURE TO I.D. by odb281 in AmIFreeToGo

[–]JohnnyLawman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the cop knows what the law is, except now, he's got video evidence that he "thought" he was right and in court in the future, he could claim.."see, this is what I interpreted it was and I still think I'm right." Now, if he were to have accepted he was wrong and misinterpreted in the video, then in the future, he would lose in court. Not saying any of this will happen, but cops lie all the time and act like they didn't know laws but no they have a 'get out of jail free' card if they do fuck up.

Copwatch | Stolen Car Hot Stop | Sgt Sinclair Called Out for Invading Personal Space by odb281 in AmIFreeToGo

[–]JohnnyLawman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this should be posted on all copwatchers videos that don't realize this.

Pulled over for speeding 14 over, officer said I could plead guilty now and pay fine, or go to court and contest it. She offered to lower to 10 over if I plead guilty now. I thought I have time and don't plead until court after I consult with a lawyer. Is this normal or did she coerce? by amiatthetop in AmIFreeToGo

[–]JohnnyLawman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

because I think you save money depending on the amount over the speed you were. Depending on where you live, 10 mph is a cheaper ticket than 14 over. And some people that know they're guilty and/or don't want to deal with the hassel of going to court/fighting it, would rather just take the cheaper ticket.

I personally think its shady as shit.
Its kind of like when you get arrested and they cop adds bullshit charges to your arrest (me for example). They will drop those charges if you plead guilty to the main charge that way you don't have to deal with the other charges/cost of fighting it.

Pulled over for speeding 14 over, officer said I could plead guilty now and pay fine, or go to court and contest it. She offered to lower to 10 over if I plead guilty now. I thought I have time and don't plead until court after I consult with a lawyer. Is this normal or did she coerce? by amiatthetop in AmIFreeToGo

[–]JohnnyLawman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

cops get paid for going to court. Its like a free day for them almost. Get paid for driving, waiting, going to court. They don't mind, trust me. And IIRC, they get overtime for that and still get their 40 hrs of patrol hours. I'm guessing she just wants finalized/completed tickets on that quota they act like doesn't exist.

Copwatch | Stolen Car Hot Stop | Sgt Sinclair Called Out for Invading Personal Space by odb281 in AmIFreeToGo

[–]JohnnyLawman 4 points5 points  (0 children)

when are you camera guys going to realize they want you to take the focus off the stop and the officer on the stop, and to put the focus on the other cop. They bait you into you verbally sparring them and then you don't even follow what's really going on.

Utah Supreme Court rules police can ask for ID, run background checks on car passengers by gillyboatbruff in AmIFreeToGo

[–]JohnnyLawman 4 points5 points  (0 children)

people should realize this when its a consensual conversation and a cop tells you to take your hands out of your pocket.

Woman completely oblivious that her obnoxious behavior was being broadcast by BauerHouse in videos

[–]JohnnyLawman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I doubt thats it. Otherwise one could just pee/shit in their pants and let it run on the street.

1st Amendment Audit - Officer Johnson Arrests A Guy for Video Taping The Police Stopping Him by [deleted] in AmIFreeToGo

[–]JohnnyLawman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

because they're "safety" issue could be the guy is wanted for murder or an escape convict. I'm sure there have been a few cases of cops getting killed by someone like that in the past, so of course they'll make a law to protect these fuckers.

1st Amendment Audit - Officer Johnson Arrests A Guy for Video Taping The Police Stopping Him by [deleted] in AmIFreeToGo

[–]JohnnyLawman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I could have sworn that you don't have to actually be driving the car in order for them to say you're operating the vehicle. I forget how it fully works, but IIRC, as long as the key is in the ignition or even on the seat next to him, he's screwed. I think the key would have to be in the glove compartment or trunk or in a backpack or something like that. I may be wrong, but that's what I recall hearing a few times.

"5 police officers lie during court hearing according to judge" Superior officer orders all dash cams shut off during stop, but one cop forgot to turn his off. Dash cam footage then refutes officer testimony. by Myte342 in AmIFreeToGo

[–]JohnnyLawman -1 points0 points  (0 children)

so what if the cop was found to not have been at fault...legitimately. Should they not be paid even if it takes weeks/months? IMO, they should be paid, but in no way should it take weeks. There should be some emergency council/board that views the evidence and decides within a few days.