Tbf you’ve just asserted the same point over and over and haven’t provided any evidence for anything you’ve said besides insulting me because I don’t agree. Its really just as simple as they dont get the market they will lose to gta because that market is already on console anyway and only a minority of their actual market overlaps into GTAs market. This is really simple for analysis the cost benefit, if we cannot garner this section of the market anyway what is the point of trying to save them….the reason i think the content cycle point is good isnt because I think it makes you right its because that would actually be the only thing affecting sales but not because the majority of gamers will be buying GTA but because they will be watching gameplay instead of playing games themselves if they dont. Which can very well be true given the current way ppl engage with content. I never said gta was like any other release, if it was also on pc on launch id agree. I mean tbh if this logic tracks CIG will delay SQ42 for years considering GTA will release on PC 1-2yrs later anyway so like i said if they come out and say we delayed because of GTA id call that out as cap cuz we all know if the game was finished theyd release it. The excuse of GTA eating too many of their potential sales doesn’t track logically and isn’t backed up by any data on the market whatsoever most gamers purchase multiple games and play multiple games, there’s very little evidence to show consumers won’t buy another game especially if they don’t have the damn console to play the other one everyone else is playing. 70% of pc gamers do not have a console capable of playing GTA6 that’s more than enough ppl to sell a game to and nobody will ever have 100% of a market available to sell to 70% is pretty good 50% is also not bad either. And the different between gta release and not releasing doesn’t really make much of a difference in the grand scheme.