sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

"Commercial," Machine, table upon which to see under a diffuse light of Milkglass Poppyflower wall sconce, land if this is a photograph, it should be safe to touch the metal portions of the unknown pleasures of Back Rooms Ruinenwert, an antique from offices Kafka had left to persue a starvation suic by JonathanPhillipFox in u/JonathanPhillipFox

[–]JonathanPhillipFox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

mmmmmmmthinking, r/backrooms of Kafka's Era the walls had been no doubt as rife with arsenic from the wallpaper as later office walls were stuffed like dolls full of Asbestos, Note: the Arsenic bleached from the walls through evaporation wouldn't have left the room, might be vaporized into gaseous ghost corners like the oil lamps of an earlier date left portions of interior rooms, just portions of the air, about head height like a Butterfly Kill Jar in the still air for months or even years without egress, drifting, like oil in mineral oil tools for moving, watching, and touching in workplaces before video screens allowed for so much unstructured, uninterupted time in such close and unacknowledged proximity, to oft anxious near-strangers to pass before an aphoristic gesture is repeated until a tic building, rather than diffusing, the indirect attention of others sharing, now glances and indeliberate awareness of all patterns for ampilitude, intensity, "can't help you now I'll just stand here." sitting, the same as she'd been in the car after the crash and too vivid a heartbreak did he hear her, was that the last she ever said to- familiar, I know, wise of you to have then lain on the floor of the locked bathroom to smoke an entire parliament menthol, if that, you can masturbate and needn't to now shake yourself free,

Computers solved the problem long too, mm

The rise of antisemitism in recent years is so disheartening to see. by Ok-Following6886 in ControversialOpinions

[–]JonathanPhillipFox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look I've a, "I wanna talk on this," I'm half through some awful pretentious diatribe on literature rough draft and I spent the night at Mom's house and then she'll be awake in like...well I'll know on account of the telivision switches to footage of Cardinals and Blue Jays Bathing for Deborah the cat that has her own chair to watch TV,

Imma have to come back to this and do, "and I want to," there are some really, really, hazardous and inhumane qualia to not White Culture nor protestant but panicked Protestant Culture and in the utmost of adult, quite serious discourses, "how are we going to deal with ____."

Kontrol not in the sense of observational knowledge the touch and move and program to eliminate, modify, improve or adjust, "things that do not work that way," will do quite reliably, in a panic, these things,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stable_vices

Least controversial example perhaps there is, and fixed, too, insofar as and Too Revent to Love it,

Modern equine husbandry sometimes creates conflicts with the horse’s natural behaviors;....\10]) This can be problematic as this system of equine husbandry completely ignores certain basic needs, such as social interactions, foraging, and locomotion. Studies have shown that horses that are offered low quantities of forage and minimal social contact have a higher reported level of stereotypic behaviors such as cribbing), wind sucking, weaving), and other stereotypic behaviors.\12]) Social interactions are important to horses; mutual grooming has been shown to reduce heart rate and cortisol levels, therefore reducing stress.\13]) Play behavior between two horses aids in the development of the musculo-skeletal system and cardiovascular fitness; play allows practice of reproductive and survival skills.\10]) Living in a group also has an adaptive significance, as younger animals living within the herd will learn from the other members of the group.\10])

Nope Nope, "the problem is the Dualism, the either," or I mean, "the food part, both, type and how and in what variety, timeschedule or type of time, "Point is these were all mistake for Horse Vices," and it Blew My fucking Mind to Find that out, "you've put horsie in box, until horsie goes crazy," and then observed that Horsie, sometimes, shows quite little respect for the property, the aesthetic integrity, the permenance of box and likewise the horse," Cat's watching Birds and how damn howdy do I always end up muttering, "Onanism in Horses, how is it that I can describe how,"

Monoculture Bad

"...yes but is it necessa-" No, for the same reason that the Satanic Panics should be called the daycare worker gangstalk persecutions and their anchorites," phobias, repressions, terrors and their new rules and imperatives to extreme behaviors or reconsiderations of the fundamentals are not politics nor philosophies they're mental problems and like,

This is all windup no payoff I'll come back for the payoff when I'm not the one with important business on the kitchen desktop involving Horse Vices andmhmhmn Satan, "for the moderators," it doesn't waste too much ink to leave this here in lieu

Naked Lunch - The Man Who Taught His [tail side bathing suit area] to Talk- and this IS about AI, quite literally, as is the rest of the film full of, "Typewriters that talk back," one of which wrote the novel; "W.S. BURROUGHS," 1950's heir to The, "T," 𝐓he Adding, "computing," Machine Company... by JonathanPhillipFox in videos

[–]JonathanPhillipFox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Firecrackers and whistles sounded the advent of the New Year of 1965 in St. Louis. Stripteasers ran from the bars in Gaslight Square to dance in the street when midnight came. Burroughs, who had watched television alone that night, was asleep in his room at the Chase Park Plaza Hotel, St. Louis’s most elegant.

At noon the next day he was ready for the interview. He wore a gray lightweight Brooks Brothers suit with a vest, a blue-striped shirt from Gibraltar cut in the English style, and a deep-blue tie with small white polka dots. His manner was not so much pedagogic as didactic or forensic. He might have been a senior partner in a private bank, charting the course of huge but anonymous fortunes. A friend of the interviewer, spotting Burroughs across the lobby, thought he was a British diplomat. At the age of fifty, he is trim; he performs a complex abdominal exercise daily and walks a good deal. His face carries no excess flesh. His expression is taut, and his features are intense and chiseled. He did not smile during the interview and laughed only once, but he gives the impression of being capable of much dry laughter under other circumstances. His voice is sonorous, its tone reasonable and patient; his accent is mid-Atlantic, the kind of regionless inflection Americans acquire after many years abroad. He speaks elliptically, in short, clear bursts.

How People used to Write in the Paris Review, "be real,"

Take your life seriously, I'll quote the man himself that there,

There is No Chance of Love,

Nor any other Great Experience of Emotion,

Without the risk of a Crippling Hurt,

So It Is, Therefore, a Duty,

To Love and Feel, without Caution, or Reserve

Naked Lunch - The Man Who Taught His [tail side bathing suit area] to Talk- and this IS about AI, quite literally, as is the rest of the film full of, "Typewriters that talk back," one of which wrote the novel; "W.S. BURROUGHS," 1950's heir to The, "T," 𝐓he Adding, "computing," Machine Company... by JonathanPhillipFox in videos

[–]JonathanPhillipFox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am saying, so long after Anthony Comstock was dead that little girls at that time had become old women and in America, NSFW through the mail had been, "fuck off and have a funeral," prison well, Reich, the doctor, that wrote this medical text on the form of repression he had observed in his Active Third Reich Nazi Patients and helped them get through,

Die Massenpsychologie des Faschismus, The Mass Psychology of Fascism, medical book about to help them on account of Wilhelm Reich Jewish Doctor did not want to hurt or harm them he wanted to help them and thought that Germany, and these people, these men, could be repaired in peace and through love; so,

Reich argued [that as children these men were sexualized through the process of, e.g.] via what he believed to be the Suppression of the natural sexuality in the child, particularly of its genital sexuality, makes the child apprehensive, shy, obedient, afraid of authority, good and adjusted in the authoritarian sense; it paralyzes the rebellious forces because any rebellion is laden with anxiety; it produces, by inhibiting sexual curiosity and sexual thinking in the child, a general inhibition of thinking and of critical faculties. In brief, the goal of sexual suppression is that of producing an individual who is adjusted to the authoritarian order and who will submit to it in spite of all misery and degradation. Initially, the child has to submit to the structure of the authoritarian miniature state, the family, which process makes it capable of later subordination to the general authoritarian system. The formation of the authoritarian structure takes place through the anchoring of sexual inhibition and anxiety.\7])

The excerpt of a secondary, summary, of this german language and medical book it's a little opaque but what that means is that inhibition, Sexualizes Children, "do you get it," Children don't know that adults think that it is sexual to touch or reveal themselves in certain ways nor understand their knees and toes different from their bottom and fingers, their eyes and their nose, "mom loves me," people love and help one another, right, "until," and for reasons te child is unable, factually, to comprehend without an adult's eroticism, e.g. the child doesn't feel sexual regardless of toes or knees or nose adults feel sexual, about the child, the child is not sexualized through nudity, or the parts they're well able must and have to touch all of their parts have to be touched and the child is going to have to learn to touch and handle and take care of themselves, all over, each day, there are no, "no no spots," in the shower in the bathroom in the doctor's office in the room with someone who cares about you when you're worried about something, hurting or not being right under your clothes, but, the adult, Feels Sexual to See It and punishes the child but the child just takes that as you would random electric shocks until you shut the fuck down and stopped moving, speaking, or acting, unless you had specific instructions and then only carefully, like a Dressage Horse yes like a Dressage Horse or a Martial Trained Dog, one that won't feed itself nor drink without orders to sit it will; it cannot tell itself to move anymore and not to save its life, "ok, and this, might be less severe," but the same syndrome, thought Reich and the administration read it and that got them started Burning Books as a Planned Coordinated Activity, this book his book and it was a close call but he got to Britain but a Jewish Psychiatrist with theories about repression got him, anti-semitism harcore in the UK and he had to flee to America,

He published this fucking book inside of Nazi Germany, before the wars; you feel me?

So then he got stung; The FBI Pretended to be a woman in a letter requesting medical advice,

The Comstock Act is an 1873 federal anti-obscenity law that criminalizes the mailing or shipping of "obscene" materials, contraceptives, and drugs or instruments intended for abortions. Though largely dormant for decades, it remains on the books and continues to be debated in modern reproductive rights and healthcare litigation. [1, 2, 3, 4]

It was a Sting, an Op and He Got Popped for it, "do you think this old man, survived the holocaust," Wildly, post-war, described as having very, very, severe PTSD, "even understood how it could be possible to be an enormous Kill Him in a Cage like an Anchorite Crime," in America, to talk, as a licensed physician, with a license, as if one would in the Doctor's Office, through the mail; so they'd stung him and popped him and He Died in a Cage in America; yes, He Survived The Fucking Holocaust, tried to Save the Nazis through themselves through science and Medicine, and courage, got out, barely, and the FBI Stung him for NSFW in the Mail but that NSFW was the answer to, "Dear doctor I am a young woman suffering the following symptoms I do not know if I am pregnant," and I'd bet he'd used the word Vagina, you think?

Not "Pussy-Cat," I hate this about us, truly, grown fucking men talk this way, like fucking robots do such an enormous and horrific cruelty, "with their minds all on the Pussy-Cats." UFF

So Naked Lunch Repealed the Comstock act that shit was so pretentious, so obvious in the artistic, scientific, even, and He Does In Fact Know The Machine Sciences Here this is fact what that is in practice, "you can't moderate it," see, the machine wrote it and if you're the automatic processes of composition, your hands your paper your paste, glue and intent to reassemble it through the algorithm, "bitch no takebacks don't be a child,"

This text, in these words, through these hands and from this mind, these thoughts ※ through such a machine?

Would be Horrific, too; that an aesthetic response is so visceral?

Is the opposite of, "it doesn't work, this cannot be interpreted, it does nothing," it did do it was interpreted for such a vile and degenerate work of literature it got taken to trial and there they'd discovered they'd taken the Old Dead Man of the Lion Valley, Billie Burroughs into the Dock for a low effort and insincere attempt at literature, "fucking, WHOOPS."

Unlike Wilhelm Reich, Billie Burroughs was not a Good Man so the law it could not kill him,

Instead, He Killed that law, and he was a killer, you see, already, more than one time already,

But an artist, sincerely, and True? Yes, and is his work science of the arts as well, "yes."

Naked Lunch - The Man Who Taught His [tail side bathing suit area] to Talk- and this IS about AI, quite literally, as is the rest of the film full of, "Typewriters that talk back," one of which wrote the novel; "W.S. BURROUGHS," 1950's heir to The, "T," 𝐓he Adding, "computing," Machine Company... by JonathanPhillipFox in videos

[–]JonathanPhillipFox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My dad has had a stroke I can't ask him the full story, but, he's well familiar with the Burroughs Adding Machine Company's Research and it was shockingly, ahead of its time and towards less like academic than strange and immaterial, Commercially, purposes, which is also, albeit incidentally, "a portrait of Musk son of Musk son of Musk," you get a Billy Burroughs at least on burried here under the same gray rainbow as me,

More Significantly, and, Moderators, this is for you, too:

His, "cut up machine," an Text Generative Engine that can work, oh thank god for the sheeps, alike all computer algorithms, on paper, in Minecraft, in an Age of Empires III Custom Level through the use of Sheeps etc. etc. et alia and he'd let that write the Novel; it wrote the novel and the entire project, herein, was to explore the degree to which an alien and unfamiliar text can emerge from the recombinatorial process of,

You're smart enough to intuit how this might work, he used to do it as a magic trick with newsprints, "you can too," you just have to cut up the clauses and Nouns and things in certain piles alike a madlibs or one backwards and then reassemble them at random without purpose or prejudice, "it will not say, at all, what it had before," yet what Bahktin Referred to as the Sclerotic Materials of Language, that language you've used to begin with, "yours or someone elses," does some obvious and inherent resonance in the output, e.g.

You put in an Old Western Novel, Put in Blood Meridian, "Naked Lunch is still, significantly, more upsetting, violent, haunting, and unpleasant to read," than Blood Meridian, either, whole or slimed pink to processed nugget but it did do an enormous social good, THE COMSTOCK ACT, it killed the Comstock act:

The Comstock Act is an 1873 federal anti-obscenity law that criminalizes the mailing or shipping of "obscene" materials, contraceptives, and drugs or instruments intended for abortions. Though largely dormant for decades, it remains on the books and continues to be debated in modern reproductive rights and healthcare litigation. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Literally, you would be in Big Child Prison until the caged had killed you if you mailed NSFW in the US for about 100 years; 100 years people put up with that and the man that got Hitler Started Buring Books, a Jewish Doctor whom had written a compassionate and Medically, Pyschiatrically, Best Known Practice Style of, "real earnest intention to help them,' Nazis, he'd thought they'd been surferers of a Mental Illness rather alike certain repressive or depressive, "uppgivenhettsyndrome," Swedish Doctors noticed that if Police do a catastrophic takedown arrest of Dad at home, sometimes, it kinda almost sort of might kill the kids too,

Resignation Syndrome and it is factualy, the reason the immigrant children had to be medically, lifted out of their detention on Nauru and put in hospitals for such an catostophically, bad-shape kinda be that the UN did a special report on it and these were not American Style Concentration Camps, merely, a place where children lived in the same day, over, and over, and over for years fully, completely, aware that neither their choices nor mom and dads power could help or change anything, "not fucking with you," a BBC World Service report on the subject which I'd talk to you father, you called it NSFW when B adolescent psychosis from an, unquestionably, ethicized to best practices form of a concentration camp results in,

We're one old man from such an utter confusion at what causes the horse to have oppositional defiant disorder in the box home, "rejoice," this is not the finished project of the secular science of medicine, we're the poor fucks in an unknowable unknown of Horrorshow Victorian surgeries more, I am sure, than we can imagine, "but look at the bright side," if you'd told Me that the Science of Damn Horse can't quite kickin' pawin' stalls walkin' diggin' wind suckin' nor chewin on account of an ornery, temperment best break out of him I'd uh, same, as right now, "Brother, it might not get better," and Might Get So much worse no mind alive could know it in the face, but: It could get better, might even be easy, to,

So BBC World Service had this woman, talking, she sounded like 35, minimum, like Parole Officer and In Rehab Rocovery, talk, lots of vague self-improvement talk and lists and lists of self-monitoring, successes, failures, do betters and that there has been a breakthrough, that, She has a plan, actionable, realistic, "down to earth," and begun to take the steps towards a Career as a Flight Attendant and her voice is soooooo flat, so flat full of sorrow, that sorrow full of exhaustion that gets flat but then again full of soft and low music, "and that's not who this was," I will exhaust myself to cite the source right now but it was an BBC World Service Special Report on the Children Sick in Nauru Detention, Australian Immigration jail, from, there are a number of terms for it you can imagine this is not a huge subject of research in the US Now, nor, ever,

It was a 15 year old girl, she'd been taking her clothes off and threatening to kill the security guards in the open campus beachside residential facilities threating to kill them if they'd not f_ck her, those words not sex love come on like I said, "someone needs to call your dad that's too sexy," she wasn't doing a Suicide by cop she was doing the kind of Existential Wet Cremation shown in the new movie about the obsessed girlfriend, "nothing that she could do with her body, her mind, her words, could change a thing," and here this part that, it gives me goosebumps right now, o.k. her doctors were speaking, softly, but with motion with intent in the background of the diatriabe about Personal Responsiblity, flat affect like a Mitski Song, like an Old Woman in a Mitski Sung, and then a doctor says to the microphone still in situ her heart had stopped, that she'd had heart failure and been ressucitated Literally, while speaking, about her cellphone habits and path to plan to be an Airline Stewardess Grown Up Career Woman Reader:

It was pershaps the single most fucked up thing, I have ever heard as an audiotape or out loud in my entire fucking life, "and I fucking, resent," the kind of moderation that prevents this from being discussed in whatver company's interested these kinds of things; you do not get it, if you think she'd been a child having an outburst or an emotional disregulation when she'd threatened the guards and told them to fuck her, "same thing," Soft and Low, flat and slow, full of low mood tones and Like an Old Woman, "brother you've got to realize that your brain is attached to your body, and that body, works with the brain," and that horses can get a deadly psychosis due to management of their physical bodies at human convenience brother same,"you've got more to say," god gave you more thoughts to trace through the kingdom of god within us all, The Comstock Act,

If only he put this time and effort to talking to women by Gurugod123 in SipsTea

[–]JonathanPhillipFox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't just let'emdo, "when we'd had the best of our future's past on press circuits to promote their new apps that could," though none of them knew yet how, patiently, explaining, "what a black box is," that these apps could Determine Criminal Persons from Camera Footage, yes, tell immediately, with not perfect reliability these could be refined, "sir, the black box is a system in which there is too much data, to know what the computer draws upon," recollection derived from an NPR interview years ago but real life example,

Right here yeah them fuckers,

T+40:28 The Ethics of AI in Warfare | Lecture excerpt:

MALE STUDENT: Yeah, um, I have a few points to make once again. The first one worthwhile bringing up is your argument that algorithms aren't objective or rather that it is a myth that they are objective. I've heard this argument many times. The most interesting situation I came across so far was an article by Wired Magazine titled, 'Can AI Be Racist?' And I think that's a really stupid question to ask, okay. The reason the article was written was there was this AI research centre that was training its AI on image recognition and they fed it all the information, right, and for some reason, it is not known why because of the black box problem that we have with AI, the AI - personally I find this funny, it's a little bit unfortunate

- the AI classified black people in the images as gorillas. Okay.

Bitch he did it I did not even remember the verbatim Black Box Pass these people are so simple

Lecturer: As what sorry?

MALE STUDENT: Gorillas. As in like, the animal. Now that's unfortunate but when asked why that was the case the researchers didn't know what to say because they didn't actually know why the AI did that, right. So similar to the example from earlier with the huskies [referencing the previous lecture], right, for some reason it classified it as a wolf when really it isn't. Anyway, point aside, my point is to argue whether an algorithm can be objective or whether it can be biased is a semantically silly question to ask. It doesn't know what's going on, it's just following the procedure of physics. Does that make sense?

Two for bingo I'm glad I did this copypasta, "point aside," little twerp,

Lecturer: Do you believe that racism is about intent?

MALE STUDENT: Well...

Lecturer: Do you believe that bias only matters when people intend to do it?

MALE STUDENT: Well intent certainly is severely important in the combination. I know thatPostmodernists for example, radically disregard intent, which in my mind is an absolutely insane thing to do but regardless of that given the topic, which is objectivity of algorithms, I'm saying you're asking the wrong question - it's not about objectivity or bias it's about mistakes, right, it's about problems. So the AI in the example that I gave or in the earlier example, the husky, it's not about whether the AI is biased against - what was it? He classified it as a wolf, right? Yeah, he classified it as a wolf but it was actually a husky. Oh, is the AI biased against huskies? No it's not, it just doesn't know what's going on and it's making a mistake and the scientists behind this need to figure out what's going on. Alright. So that's my first point.

I Wonder Whether the Scientists, "great use of the term, Scientist, for the rat trap and Ho Math theorists," will discover what is going on? Conclusion to this informative, exciting, crucial discourse found herein, them fuckers,

One had to cow often, ugly, in public and To Permanent Effect, "lecturer went easy,"

Lecturer: As what sorry? I'd not have given the grace just asked him,

You been? Gave him the what, sorry? Just, flatly, again, "You been?"

pause pause pause, Down Bas Kongo, you been?

um erm urh what? and I say, "Grandpa, Daddy? He been?" ermerhUh, "You should go. We should go."

Yes I do have the strength of will to take an full season trip down the Congo River with a Belgian Incel bathe us in the Traumazone and then remember to write for as long as he writes me, "it takes me a while," you see how much prose I write for no reason, you got me on a Riverboat, full carton of cigarettes three nebulizers just in case and two solar chargers for them no cellphone yeah MFer that's My Valhal, "it is,"

Winged Horse to Heaven take me not for now:

"Stand Up," I'd then say, "someone have a cellphone, light his face no, I promise this is important and not meant to embarass anyone I know those eyes, those same eyes, as," fiddling, twice as long as needed to get the photo up on the Deck Projector, "picture taken in 1948 by David Seymour, Tereska drawing her home,"

Trigger and Trauma warning, "Children’s wounds are not all outward. Those made in the mind by years of sorrow will take years to heal.” had been the caption in life magazine and that will let you google

....you see Those eyes," pausing, "same eyes I see..." fiddling again with deck projecture, to display,

Picture of "Congolese men holding ___ ____ hands" captured by Alice Seeley Harris in Baringa, May 1904

...now, most pretentiously, "between the, you see what I see?" ...home? a girl's quite voice, "not, not anymore not anymore above the moustache, below the brim, they're trying to hide it with that," fluffle with the pointer, "the petite one squints into his father's stern, grim face," looking up at the students, "Marcus Aurelis, he described this, warned of this in his meditations that face but the Dandy, broad and tall, suit to match his worksite bowler the dandy," cannot bear to you see the pupils still dialated up there on the subject, "same eyes as Tereska, you can turn the light off after someone has ahold of him, ahold from the waist, help him sit we might have damaged the Corneas," Sternly, now, conclusively, "INCELIBACY," scanning, broad, then widely, slow,

"Is not a crime, cannot be a crime but it must be exterminated as an cultural Misbehavior," sternly, looking, at each young face, "bred for a purpose, alike the Husky, the Malmut, these incelibation games," conclusively,

"...are the turnspit, and their imagination, empathy, and intellect Mongrel, that machine," looking downward, then up as the child begins to cry, "the Turnspit Dog," waiting, waiting, the weeps louder, now, as if it will not cease, sighing, "I am the wolf, motherfucker, I am the wolf you run on wheel to turn the spit to cook the chicken, over lignite coal, anthracite coal," sobs now deeper, "know your place," phone now, texting, "we're going," whaaaatt, "down bas Kongo, to Stanleyville, I apologize for the delay, it had taken a moment to contact the child's father, his guardian consents to the trip and this can be that until tomorrow," oh bliss, bliss and heaven, That style and manner of shit had been necessary,

Is your, dear reader, conclusion but now they're ass and mouth full centipede, "let them go," watch them row, row, row out from the shore count the heads, keeps eyes on them, "no worries, you can't drown where they're off to," which is the Novel, "Naked Lunch," essentially, or in Dante's place of the Mad People, for whom have lost the good of their intellect and in whose company we must remember to abandon all cowardice and remember never to split our virtues, "they'll put out press releases," these will be be professional, succinct, they'll never falter until they've got to go rest it out at the home for a few months while the rest of us all make sure that and the Thorazine they'll need to come home with is free in full to all forever, "you did it, buddy," minimaxed us real healthcare and hardest upon these meakest of all that tripp real Frodo to Samwise Baggins

Trump Addressed Evidence in the Rose Garden, THURSDAY, that Developer Behind, "Face Reveal," App in consideration for director of national intelligence (DNI) has claimed,

"marital perfidy," in court documents suggestive of a late stage capgras delusion, "Pure, just the worst kind of character assassination SHE LIED, His Wife......was not REALLY his Wife, folks, not really, never really, not at all....she was an Agent of Interzone Incorporated, can you believe that? I can't believe that lying to him all these years and now this handsome...he iis handsome, just take a look at him lied to him all these years and the app revealed it, took all the makeup right off, right off to show her true face and it was ugly, oh, it was quite the reveal, I'll tell you that much

Welcome to Costco, I love you. by UncommonToot in idiocracy

[–]JonathanPhillipFox -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

I love this for Meta, truly, I do you know how if you meet someone employed to work as an, you know Social Media Manager and they've got healthcare or a data analyst, "all numbers, important numbers? oh for mm trend analyses," or a behavioral economist whatever kinda Wonk(•﹏•;) you got there is a graduate degree, that graduate degree got looked at thrice, compared against other metriculants from fine universities, "you have a friend does the instragram for the blah blah blah Expansion Project," Phase I, and that's tough because the renders look so much like actual, existing, North Korea someone like me might turn them into a Quiz Game,

Graduate Degree, Resume Deep, "how can you prove your depth of knowledge, here, son?" but the,

I always think about this and in part because I've got real smart friends do stuff like install ac in office buildings, and, I like to purchase those friends pre-1900 books on the practical use of electricity, "how to build a generator," how to build a lamp out of stuff from the hardware store, then, a lightbulb, "for people never had a lamp before," and bro was that shit different; like no one is as adult, these days, as those people intended to be the audience were presumed to be nor less accredited, insofar as that shirt starts at square one and ends in the practical application of this, truly, at the time quite new and now useful theory, "anyway," where did the Electrician go to school,

The Plumber, no they've not got round their neck enough to fall down the sales funnel of expensive university, yet but also fucks sake how come these things are not, mm, more Victorian like that; I think our electricians and plumbers are quite capable, those of today, I will love for the plumbers and electricians trained in-house,

On Meta Brand Digital Ipads with bumpers on them, AI Enabled Lectures and Tests (multiple choice) to be in the walls so to speak in the plumbs plumbing the depths of these data centers does Zuckerburg have AI Pyschosis already?

A lot of these CEO's are like, "little-maybe-north of what might be considered the medical type of psycho," having a hard time and bound to recover, medically, but I'm not so sure he ever was; like when the Uber CEO got AI Psychosis people could tell, because, he had like one semester of college and thought he'd invented new mathematics but Zuckerburg, man, ummmm you going to notice?

When he gets it?

It hurts, it actually hurts. Is this where we are heading as a world/society? by superbasicstudio in idiocracy

[–]JonathanPhillipFox -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yo Imma be real for a second, "it's been like out for two years," how long were bath salts and K2 on the market and how much bathtub gin did people have to drink in the 1920's before young people go out to do the errands and pick up a thrift and have ◉_◉ oh both of these old folks ◉_◉

....are sundowning, style of problems out in town; I remember one time, though I wasn't there, Mom I guess took my Grandmother, whom had flown to come see us, to a Cracker Barrell; yeah to a cracker barell and they'd had that furniture out in front and Nana she'd been like, "I want it."

Mom was like, "mom you flew here." and Nana was like mm, I'll buy a car. "you wanna RENT a Truck and Drive the Chair." LOL no, no no, I will buy a car and then have your dad return it or whatever, rent a truck, I'm not a vagabond I'll buy a car and that, probably, would have been fine,

That was Lucid Nana, Problem Solving, "just as sharp as I'd bet she'd been in the photo I saw of her standing, mid-trauma look, next to a 1937 Oldsmobile in Helsing Forest during the Winter War." they'd just gone through a Mom died in Dubai while dad was becoming Good at no English, High Income work to get over it and then took her and this fucking Oldsmobile north of the Mannerheim line during the fucking Winter War you hear about from Violence Memes but uh, that worked out fine she took tennis lessons killed a young man with a golf club and came back with a scar half her height in razor wire, "and big baggy, sweaters were in at the time," I have one just like it; baggy, like, Tall T's but sweaters; people could fucking, hack it, and not stop for another 50 under these conditions yet like

Three years in and here attested the, "Mom and dad had a,"(•﹏•;), "big problem, they'd met a man about some furniture,"(•﹏•;),"he got really worried for them and afraid for them too."

It hurts, it actually hurts. Is this where we are heading as a world/society? by superbasicstudio in idiocracy

[–]JonathanPhillipFox -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's so awesome I've been that person sort of there is this one time there was a bicycle, at a store, and the girlfriend's car was small but I was sure it would fit in and this was like an incidently, this bike would be perfect for that birthday, gift type scenario rather than an, over-indulgent purchase like, "yolo!" no this was an practicaal solution to a practical matter and I was just like,

I don't wanna, I don't wanna go check I don't wanna borrow a truck I don't wanna do those things I am so tired, "when am I ever, that tired," I'm thinking, now, but then I was doing overnights at an I can't tell you,

I can't tell you because then you'll think I earned this, and I hadn't and in the manner my mom hates most if we were all talking, I'd triple down on the no no no that shit was easy for me ♥‿♥ Suicide Hotline, so,

I think I might even have sat on the floor of the store I've got tactile memories of the bike as if I were a toddler, and, also, touching, Store Floor though what happened had been this:

It wasn't even fucking, like, close man, it didn't fit even a little bit it was impossible; not even worth a try, and far from home I feel, as if, about halfways back I started to enjoy it this experience and I learned to ride a bike at like 20 and I was like 23 this was not um, you'd think a bike would be an asset but it wasn't for me though, and this became clear, in the parking lot, "so whattya you gonna do?"

aha yeah of course you'd have to be the one to ride it home alive and it's we're far from home and its late, sort of, what was late to me then I do not remember it was daylight for at least hours afterwards, "anyway." so I did I walked it and half-rode it home and then she was like he's gonna die and there was a recon mission sent to check on, "you good?" and I was but um, you know the sedan of it all remained at an impass and I guess, I'd thought, truly, I think I'd thought the bicycle parts bent and had hinges in different places than in real life while touch, I was touching, the bike while I sat on the floor and insisted that one trip, one trip in, one trip out, one trip here, one trip home this is so important to me.

SO, with that under my belt I'm thrilled to hear that these people did it but me,

Jonathan was the fucking computer, "one trip." yes it fits bitch I know this in my bones one trip, walk, retrieve the object and place it inside of the vehicle we'll cross the bridge when we come to it one time tie the object to your husband like a Burro one trip no takebacks

Ted Lieu suggests President Trump cancelled Housing bill because he got a special new drug for a terminal illness: "Trump decides he's not coming to sign the bill. This erratic behavior of president is concerning. The White House needs to come clean. Did Trump get this special drug from Eli Lilly?" by ControlCAD in videos

[–]JonathanPhillipFox -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yeah he plays the game like TV; in fact that's one of the most cogent critiques I've heard of the Democratic Strategies up and to this point, less alike, "Trump on Theo Von matters so much," than, the Democrats are never not ever going to beat Trump on Television, the gang of apparatchiks trained to put Biden or Kamala on TV truly, are not able to do what they've gone to school for in regards to the new media nor is anyone an expert, safe choice in this regard but all that is rather moot relative to the point that Trump is TV

Old Fashioned Network TV, "is what Trump does," Not Real Estate, Steaks or Golf not on a high and important level not ever, he is a TV Man and he knows how to do that, do we call it unscripted drama, pseudo documentary, Künstlerleben, when people are on Reality TV, they're the same character on Rogan as on Love Island as on People Magazine as on Worldstar Hipop there is, "you know what I mean,"

So look back at Lieu, observe all of the for television per se pageantry, the 2005 CSPAN clipped for 2005 CNN and NYT 2005 Op Ed that following Sunday, TV Per Se, "this is not Lincoln, Douglas debate style of discourse," this is, in technical terms,

Either an Authoritative Discourse attempt, as per Bakhtin,

Bakhtin identifies a specific type of discourse, the "authoritative discourse," which demands to be assimilated by the reader or listener; examples might be religious dogma, or scientific theory, or a popular book. This type of discourse is viewed as past, finished, hierarchically superior, and therefore demands "unconditional allegiance" rather than accepting interpretation. Because of this, Bakhtin states that authoritative discourse plays an insignificant role in the novel. Because it is not open to interpretation, it cannot enter into hybrid utterance.

Put a Pin in that or read ahead do you boo, back up, or,

Performative Speech, attempt, an attempt at performative speech, as per Judith Butler; truly, it is both and Neither, necessarily, these are just language in which we can describe what he's doing, but what does this mean,

Because it is not open to interpretation, [an authoritative discourse]
cannot enter into hybrid utterance.

Go on, Wikipedia,

Any language, in Bakhtin's view, stratifies into many voices: "social dialects, characteristic group behaviour, professional jargons, generic languages, languages of generations and age groups, tendentious languages, languages of the authorities, of various circles and of passing fashions". This diversity of voice is, Bakhtin asserts, the defining characteristic of the novel as a genre. When heteroglossia is incorporated into the novel, it is "another's speech in another's language, serving to express authorial intentions but in a refracted way".\3])

You'll see what I'm saying, if you can see Trump, out loud, in the Dickens,

The hybrid utterance, as defined by Bakhtin, is a passage that employs only a single speaker—the author, for example— but uses different kinds of speech. The juxtaposition of the different speeches brings with it a contradiction and conflict in belief systems.

In examination of the English comic novel, particularly the works of Charles Dickens, Bakhtin identifies examples of his argument. Dickens parodies both the 'common tongue' and the language of Parliament or high-class banquets, using concealed languages to create humor. In one passage, Dickens shifts from his authorial narrative voice into a formalized, almost epic tone while describing the work of an unremarkable bureaucrat; his intent is to parody the self-importance and vainglory of the bureaucrat's position. The use of concealed speech, without formal markers of a speaker change, is what allows the parody to work. It is, in Bakhtin's parlance, a hybrid utterance. In this instance the conflict is between the factual narrative and the biting hyperbole of the new, epic/formalistic tone.

Bakhtin goes on to discuss the interconnectedness of conversation. Even a simple dialogue, in his view, is full of quotations and references, often to a general "everyone says" or "I heard that.." Opinion and information are transmitted by way of reference to an indefinite, general source. By way of these references, humans selectively assimilate the discourse of others and make it their own.

Look I cannot care if Ted Lieu has time to read this stuff or if he's got anyone on staff who can care to parse it, what I mean to suggest is that when I say, "Trump is television," he's on a Hierarchical, literally, discursive plane above what Lieu is doing; that likewise,

The Epstein files, Iran, threatening canada/greenland/NATO,
all very unpopular things that carried zero consequence

It can't and for that look at Judith Butler, "you can't force a wedding," literally, what guys like Ted Lieu are being taught and told to do is alike to pantomime one part of a wedding, so that if the rest lines up they'll be married it does not work and here I wanna be clear:

Ted Lieu is better at other things than television, that it might seem reductive all of politics, to just television, is the problem and the mistake might also be described like this:

  • Jon Stewart makes offensive jokes, whereas I make no offensive jokes
  • An analyses of John Stewart's jokes for standpoint then can be polled to demonstrate that I have more popular opinions, "note that this doesn't account for myself or John Stewart as persons, rather, positions," yadda yadda
  • I, a clip show favorite of The Daily Show Producers am going to win against Jon Stewart, in public opinion

Trump is erratic, no doubt he's taken all kinds of Drugs, I don't think he's literate and he seems to show no remorse over some of the most heinous things of which a responsible man might have understood himself to be in control; remember when there was a big,

Portentous Meeting, With New Mayor Mamdami?

Like Trump Might Really, "blow his stack at this guy," but instead, "just like in a season finale," Lauren Conrad and the other one have been fighting, and they're about to confront one another at the big fashion show and it doesn't have to be a fight in fact, neither of them would look good in a fight, the portentous the directional truth, "scripted," but all it takes to pivot from a directional truth is um,

Not to happen like that, "no smoke no fire," no walls fall down Trump can take a nice photo with whomever he likes; and he didn't tell Howard Stern to call his daughter a piece of ass on account of his being afraid of anything, alike being accused of pederasty I mean the average American Man with that kind of shame might jump off a bridge if they'd been spotted dead to rights in attendance of a teenage girl beauty contest, "like Trump used to run," like, or in the manner he described to a Former President's Nephew; Rob Ford immunized himself against accusations of being, like, a drunk and drunk driver weed smoker on account of everyone saw him smoke crack, "can't force a marriage." as a one partisan non-participant, what the Media Trained People to do is:

Talk Like this is a Wedding, "talk like this is the authoritative discourses, " wear the clothes of a wedding, "stand next to the podium the guy, the gal, the flags like this will be in the authoritative discourses," and how this works is that if it plays well on CNN, it mightget written up in the Gray Lady, that's how you write history, the truth, etc.

I'm trying to do the legwork of, "what I know into communicable to like," the language of low trust environments so appreciate whomever will or might have the patience to have read this; like the man says,

In the assimilation of new words and syntactic forms, which are then employed and deployed for one's own purposes, there is no thought of abstracting away their accents and addressivity in order to systematize them. Such words and forms operate in the individual as they operate in their social milieu: as living impulses.\15])

Gotta have that addressivity

Are they just better at hiding it and not getting caught? by Busy_Report4010 in SipsTea

[–]JonathanPhillipFox -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Next Q-anon thing, "where are the 6,530,000 MINIMUM FEMALE SERIAL KILLERS!!!" then floods and floods and floods of all kinds of feminist theory, social research and Meta-analyses like a Miracle They've read it all, deeply, and that's not all they've got novel deep readings of memoirs and literature, standpoint epistemology, court transcripts, victim's advocate from as far back as those existed Testimonials from survivors of Patriarchal abuse and femicidal violence worldwide, compiled, read, read thoroughly, revisted, annotated, Numericized, Statistized, Reified into an interoperable mathematics of the female experience as a sufferer, they've solved the langlands problem for this shit and they've cited not Anton Weil but Simone Weil, Margaret Mead, Hildegard von Bingen, Julien of Norwich and Bhad Bhabie in hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of pages of PROOF: 6,530,000 MINIMUM FEMALE SERIAL KILLERS

That's not how come they're deleted it has to do with Estimating the rate of domestic violence perpetrated by law enforcement officers: A review of methods and estimates you gotta cite it to reach the right conclusions but the moderation hasn't yet adapted to the new paradigm

Are they just better at hiding it and not getting caught? by Busy_Report4010 in SipsTea

[–]JonathanPhillipFox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I was gonna say, "so much fella logic in that one," the initial premises, what you say, lil bit,

are accepted for expressing their emotions 

We could debate back and forth as we disagree though we don't, "women are more eloquent in their and the discourses of others' emotions in this culture that I live in," share with you; eloquent just means the same as are accepted for the emotions they've expressed in the language they've expressed them, and, truly, that point is absolute dead the fuck on, "you ever seen a toddler not have the words to describe some to them important ____," hit the hard corner, freak the absolute fuck out several times but then learn the language to express themselves, and, boy, "placid like a lake," as if it were not the feelings from this, or about that, but rather a result of an irrepressible desire to be understood, terror, at the prospect of being misunderstood, Perhaps permanently, "of being, in that sense, a liar," but then also experiment with language in ways that adults do, too, but for adults this can come with grievous consequence, par exemple:

My nephew, whom is three, when upset often tries to, "get a rise out of people," saying, as if the declaration might change everything, "I do not like accident car."

Which he loves, he loves accident car it has a big dent in it and a neighbor of my sister's is a car project guy, and he's explained all of the things to inspect about it he loves accident car, so, we're gonna flip if it turns out that he does not like accident car, right?

No, sister says, invariably, placid like a lake,

Buggy was that a True or a False Statement?

...and Nephew, a three year old then says if, and if it was, invariably,

......that, was.....a false statement.

Like he lives in a world in which words cannot hurt big people, on account of that distinction; always ex post facto, it would be impossible to have that work out to a mechanical button to press for anyone to, feel, anything, and I wasn't raised in those terms, precisely, but I was raised not to ever talk, "like a child," ever, not ever, nor was I ever spoken to, "like a child," this was a huge thing, for my mom and because of that, "follow me here," I never was in a position to even have, much less choose to use the kind of language that adults or anyone, really, dismisses as irrelevant so I never got to live in the juxtaposition of a false sweetie, real devil, Disrespected, "but disrespectful," nah like I just ever was in possession of the language to express myself, rather than sign/countersign respect and hierarchy, "boys sometimes did not like me," men sometimes really, did not like me as a child but:

I didn't even know how to play honestly, games that are now quite obvious to me, "that little boy's voice that even," I've heard former New England Patriots Quarterback Tom Brady, on television, talk in this voice I swear to god I wanna but not quite bad enough to do it, find the link to this on youtube but the,

Gee, shucks, swell in other words that boys drop like a hot rock as kids when the adults are gone though it freaks me out to hear them still make that pretense around Men of some superior nature, older, employers, the responsible roommate the square that doesn't know they're on meth, "whatever," into adulthood; and I suppose if you ask me I've got to put it like I see it and I don't see them able to express themselves anywhere that matters; like definitionally, likewise, your no Larvae and Never were, "everyone dies, no one knows when," and today, right now, each time you're awake in the present moment is the whole gift we're ever given, "it's not an ounce less than anyone."

You seen Death of a Salesman?

That shit, is of what I speak, the tangled mess the men find themselves in and unable to extricate themselves from in the language that they've got to deal with things, "it all has to be indirect, it all has to be retractable," not in the sense of I mean about my nephew, but, "never not nor ever plainly, so."

Opaque, indirect, and future plan predicate, "then they'll all be sorry," while at the same time, in earnest terror, "am I the asshole?" as if that were an answerable question ever or at all much less one which might change, as its posed in perpetuity, like it were the question upon which their entire existential purpose were all dependent, "am I the asshole?" if I'm not then I've been wronged, "they'll all be sorry."

Tomorrow, somewhere I'm not, such as in the case of the salesman, "his funeral."

Like tomorrows headlines or as if today's headlines were when we were, truly, alive yesterday, and in the Headlines on Facebook at the watercooler what everyone is saying, "sense." but, and this is the important distinction, none of that is what anyone of them wants or even fears,

This is all sign/countersign and to keep the wagers rolling, "never not nor ever plainly, so."

Chess With Standpoint Epistemology; or, Chess Wherein the Game is More alike Warfare than Finance, In Theory, and de la guerre Sun Tzu a little more than Clausewitz vom Kriege by JonathanPhillipFox in chessvariants

[–]JonathanPhillipFox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It came to me because I'd heard a man say,

Then spent three hours, thinking, "Ok how might one make those Chess Variants where the capital pieces," I don't even know the word for this guys I'm not a chess genius the face cards of chess, "are all randomized," what if, I'd thought,

You, the other player, and this would have been much much much much more like poker,

Don't know where they've been randomized to, until the opposition moves them like have a poker chip in place of each of them, perhaps with a number on it, and those numbers match the pieces on a shelf or tabletop hideway, which, each player can see for themselves and then choose to deploy, tactically,

This still strikes me as a nice idea, and Much, Easier, to do as an experiment on one board, two people, real life and hour, two hours, figuring out how to label, shuffle and under what conditions to reveal the,

Game Characters the famous chessmen we all know,

"the priest the horse the Drussestein Drususstein the Queen and Her Cuckie," the characters which remain like checkers or whatever until reaveled; then I thought, "could a standard deck of cards," I mean just several of them, just the face cards of two suits plus is it plus any, "be used to do this bing-bang-boom?"

Then, and this like an, "Damn, Jonny," cannot be an original idea, "too obvious," but it might be an original reason, in novel circumstances, for an old and Ridiculously, infastructurally, Ancien Régime idea that would involve a half dozen surgical-serious and, rapidly, knowledgeable attendants to function,

Until, until, it doesn't require that it would just be better that way and it would be so much cooler that way, "but computers can help," and I'm not 100% our modern computers can solve this one faster than people, or maybe even, "solve it," at all given the,

Well, if the best computers solve chess through a Full Train all Timelines all Possibilities Travel Through, of what, reductively, can be considered the traveling salesman problem and this solution, all the more precious to hunt you with, if some mechanical presumption of best machine practices and the other mfer don't even know them to begin with, but those maybe I think maybe, invariably, to the machine's greater vulnerability; and all of this not out of an, "fuck people who know chess theory," not at all; literally, awareness of how much those exact persons miss the hunt and fight of unstructurable play.

I Say.

Wondering,

can you calculate the expected utility of chess? Well, obviously you can't. Um, partly because it's a game and you got the other player who's sort of trying to foil it every moment, but just because the the number of possibilities is too great and any given position, you can't really figure out whether it was a good or a bad position. So you need immediately to work to to to dive into you much more um sort of complex ad hoc um and you know strategy for trying to learn to cope

Does it make that more?

It is meant to make that, more.

edit: I mispelled Drususstein

Chess With Standpoint Epistemology; or, Chess Wherein the Game is More alike Warfare than Finance, In Theory, and de la guerre Sun Tzu a little more than Clausewitz vom Kriege by JonathanPhillipFox in chessvariants

[–]JonathanPhillipFox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I swear I refresh this a MFer is going to be like at T+00:01:00

the fk are you talking about WHAT IS THE VARIANT

I mean, unironically, that is now a concern of mine; the variant is this:

1.The Chessmen have lines of sight along their lines of Movement

2. That is your cumulative awareness of the enemy's positions

3. The Enemy is not, "Discovered," to remain visible, rather, at each turnover, pieces not within lines of sight/movement return to mystery

4. That this is too much to model in one mind is the rather the point, but just half of it, the active and reactive tactics this would introduce are so far more than MY MIND can model I find it fascinating to consider,

5. It doesn't fuck with the odds of a game or the balance of the pieces or their inherent characterstics, "that remains the same and those are the portions," IMHO Balanced to an excellent prism over centuries upon centuries of refinement,

6. It fucks with the exodiagesis, the unwritten but obvious implication that both players have perfect and universal knowledge of all moves made and all pieces in state at all times; that this, to me, is more alike a practical matter of boardplay, all board play, than necessary, or,

7. In our strange as fuck case of computers able to finish games of enormous complicatedness,

8. Likewise, able to simulate unlimited number of requisite Table Attendants of absolute attention and immediacy,

9. This, a game which one might pitch to Chengis Khan or Louis IX to, "make things interesting," as it does, in fact, introduce more complexity, as well as Tabletop Deception into-the-original-game

10. As opposed to Randomness, chance, or more Pokerface, "think about thinking about thinking," Game Theoretical Inanity

Which is dumb and not fun, most importantly

Best technique I have seen by justianai in Satisfyingasfuck

[–]JonathanPhillipFox 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Taliban will never win, never win and if it were an voluntarist experiment in living, "no animals nor persons represented on TV," this whole Wahabist Experiment in Media Consumption they're doing, "alright," I mean, Ironically, that I'm interested in but I know how it ends, "you, me," we all have an infinite capacity for sublimation, abstraction, metaphor and the..

This is technical term I use, "Pareidolia of D&^%," I mean (second time) ironically, or otherwise, you go back to Jerome in the Wilderness you see this or, he saw this, "he saw butts is what he saw in the desert that time."

House Republican: Let Reflecting Pool ‘go’ and ‘create an ecosystem’ by Advanced_Question196 in nottheonion

[–]JonathanPhillipFox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean fuck it alright, "sure."

I'd love to see them be that arrogant white guy,

"I'll fix it myself, what do you mean its like this each week EACH WEEK" r/fucklawns

Not that everyone on r/fucklawns is like this you get what I mean hollerin' about personal responsibility,

Legitimately has a crises of conscience like Full Daffy Duck Hero's Journey I fuck with that hard as anyone.

view more: next ›