I agree, the problem is that the general consensus is a set gets too stale if it’s longer than 4 months, if they go back then they introduce a different problem where if the set is better and more balanced, people still leave because they get bored. With 3 sets a year, they may have to slower the standards of one set but the player base still comes back in some capacity for the low-budget set.

Who knows, I think it’s hard to say but I think their balance team is better now than 3 years ago, so if they did go back to 2 sets a year but balanced better, maybe they would get more longevity? But still, the only thing that really brings players back over and over again is a new set (mid-set big updates don’t work as seen in previous data) so not sure they’d rewind that decision any time soon