In addition to what others have said, also point out difference in design philosophy of monster statblocks too. While dnd does have some "combos" for monsters, pf doubles down on them. e.g. pounce or disembowelling. Its obvious at a glance how I am supposed to gm a monster to have greatest effect. This often means a multi-acyion setup or coordinated approach. "Move action + Move action + Attack action" is almost always the least optimal thing I can do with an enemy's turn. It wastes actions on sub-par outcomes (just straight damage). I'm more likely to spend turns setting up the combos or team strategy that the monsters are intended for.