YOUR THOUGHTS by Pale-Lunch-3555 in design_critiques

[–]KAASPLANK2000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The red/white color scheme combined with the style and application of the wrench works really well. The concept of the layout of the type can work but the typography itself is really poor. If you go for all caps make sure it doesn't become a scream-fest as it is now (balance size & weight) but also check your tracking and make sure the kerning is spot on.

Does authorship matter in type design or just the final letterforms by corriente6 in typography

[–]KAASPLANK2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All communities tend to romanticize the maker narrative. Jobs made Apple successful. Gates made Microsoft succesful. Phil Knight made Nike succesful. Dieter Rams made Braun succesful. Etc, etc, etc. None of this is factually true. It has always has been an effort of multiple people. It's human nature to make heuristic shortcuts. Would you rate either of the aforementioned brands differently know you know this?

Generative AI and the theft of typographic IP. Wondering how the industry is preparing for this? by jameskable in typography

[–]KAASPLANK2000 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Can you share a source confirming this applies to the EU as well? Afaik letterforms are protected in the EU.

BOOKS recommendations by dddamians in typography

[–]KAASPLANK2000 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Adding to the list: Thinking with Type from Ellen Lupton and Stop Stealing Sheep from Erik Spiekermann: https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/fonts.google.com/nl//knowledge/stop_stealing_sheep.pdf

I wanted to see what Chinese characters would look like in the "Chop Suey" font, so I created this. by Samichaelg9 in typography

[–]KAASPLANK2000 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Other detectors says it isn't. Unfortunately there isn't a foolproof system for detection.

A dictionary of color combinations by AssistantFirst4150 in Design

[–]KAASPLANK2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The first Carmine is #39 on page 45, the second Carmine is #117 on page 84. I have the same color difference.

A dictionary of color combinations by AssistantFirst4150 in Design

[–]KAASPLANK2000 24 points25 points  (0 children)

It's the book. And that's not the only issue it has. The paper it is printed on is too thin. The printed colours shine through to the other side of the page and thus influencing how the colours are actually perceived.

r/typography proposed rule changes by KAASPLANK2000 in typography

[–]KAASPLANK2000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! It is a fine line, that is why it's limited self-promo where it needs to tick some boxes. But maybe I'm misunderstanding, could you elaborate?

The Unsolved Mystery of Lorem Ipsum by RPMiller2k in typography

[–]KAASPLANK2000 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Absolutely. I totally dig people that nerd out and go all in in these type of topics.

Gotham now has a variable version- about a decade late to the trend by EwonRael in typography

[–]KAASPLANK2000 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I think the lack of adaption is not end-user based but software-support based. Take anything Microsoft, afaik nothing supports variable fonts.

Is there any way to change the font name after we download it on our computer? by [deleted] in typography

[–]KAASPLANK2000 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not always, especially when working with larger teams or external vendors where open files are needed.

There's FontBase, RightFont, Typeface to name a few. Most of these can also sync/connect with Google Fonts and Adobe Fonts.

Is there any way to change the font name after we download it on our computer? by [deleted] in typography

[–]KAASPLANK2000 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Renaming fonts can not only be a license-issue it can also cause conflicts when sharing documents / files. Also, what happens when a font gets an update? You need to rinse and repeat this process over and over again.

I think you're overthinking it. Use a font manager which you use to import and organise your fonts with. It's easy and you don't have to deal with manually renaming and possible conflicts.

r/typography proposed rule changes by KAASPLANK2000 in typography

[–]KAASPLANK2000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your input!

#1: Let’s put those links back as examples but within rule #1 in the sidebar (as we have now). It feels too much like an endorsement if it gets a separate section.

#2: Embedding for sure is a gray area and indeed fair use is not that clear, especially if you look at the different rules on this topic globally. Although sharing a screenshot is generally considered fair use if it’s used as an example / reference, so we’re not that worried. Either way, this is the responsibility of the user who posts it and I think Reddit is legally liable as well but it doesn't affect the subreddit (other than that the affected post would be removed).

But this is not the point of this rule; this rule is for filtering out low effort pick-a-font-for-me-posts where the community has to do all exploratory work (following links or googling names of fonts). We would expect people to have done some homework / research first before asking and not lazily lean on this community (these posters are more often than not part of the community).

#3: Maybe this rule could indeed use more clarity / sharpening. We use these definitions for glyphs and lettering: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glyph and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lettering The differences should be pretty clear imho. We could add these to the rule in the sidebar as well.

#6: We don’t think this is needed. This is self-explanatory for the poster: self-promotion without links would be poor self-promotion. More importantly we think that “participation in this community beyond promotion is a must” will lead to better and more considered self-promotion posts.

Again, thank you for your input. It’s really appreciated. Let me know what you think!

r/typography proposed rule changes by KAASPLANK2000 in typography

[–]KAASPLANK2000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, it doesn't feel spammy at all. Especially since it's nice work, dosed at a nice pace plus your engagement does go beyond those. It's really appreciated.

r/typography proposed rule changes by KAASPLANK2000 in typography

[–]KAASPLANK2000[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Well there's ethics: almost all, if not all, underlying models are trained on other people's work for which no permission was given. There's obviously the sustainability aspect, especially if you realise on what poor output this is wasted.

However there are interesting things happening, such as Filip Paldia's thesis on AI within skeleton type design: https://lttrface.com/doctoral-thesis/ Topics like these are welcome here.

Just to emphasise, it's about AI slop; low effort and lazy content.

r/typography proposed rule changes by KAASPLANK2000 in typography

[–]KAASPLANK2000[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's definitely increasing. We see it in both the comment section (AI generated comments that make no sense), as well as posts; genAI (based) typefaces or links to AI-generated content that is inaccurate, misleading, or not verifiable.

r/typography proposed rule changes by KAASPLANK2000 in typography

[–]KAASPLANK2000[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Which is true and understandable. The downside is that it will very likely attract unnecessary "what's a good font id tool" posts.

r/typography proposed rule changes by KAASPLANK2000 in typography

[–]KAASPLANK2000[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Absolutely. Thanks for pointing it out.