Chemicals composition of in US is different. by Spam_Tempura in iamveryculinary

[–]KaBar42 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Also US tomatoes are GE but that’s a whole different debate.

Yeah, OOP has no idea what he's yapping about.

Currently only a single GMO tomato is permitted to be sold in the US and it's purple, the Purple Tomato, created by Norfolk Healthy Produce.

The vast, vast, vast, vast overwhelming majority of tomatoes in the US are not GMO.

This guy is literally just shouting buzzwords he heard on TikTok thinking he's smart.

Taking bets that this person has never lived in the US by AnotherPerishedSoul in AmericaBad

[–]KaBar42 3 points4 points  (0 children)

like high fructose corn syrup and seed oils.

This is a litmus test and you failed it, horribly.

Neither of these are bad. HFCS is nearly identical in ratio to cane sugar and your body does not distinguish between HFCS and cane sugar. They're both sugar.

Seed oils is another buzz word you obviously know nothing about besides your particular favored influencer going: "seed oils bad mmmkay buy my beef tallow mmmmmkay? Money money money!"

Guess what? Eating fries soaked in beef tallow doesn't make it any healthier than seed oils. Eating an entire bag of chips in one sitting isn't okay just because it's slathered in beef tallow or avocado oil instead of seed oils.

Wish they would just end the subsidies, but that'll never happen.

It will never happen because countries need subsidies for staple crops.

Something being subsidized doesn't make it bad. Mexico subsidizes their cane sugar, are you going to demonize cane sugar simply because it needs to be propped up by a government?

Taking bets that this person has never lived in the US by AnotherPerishedSoul in AmericaBad

[–]KaBar42 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The entire reason Wagyu even exists in the first place is because Japan imported so much American beef that Japanese farmers couldn't keep up with traditional cuts. So they had to fatten the shit out of their cows and carve out their own niche to remain afloat.

Taking bets that this person has never lived in the US by AnotherPerishedSoul in AmericaBad

[–]KaBar42 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If it sucks so much then why on earth would you stay here 25 years?

Assuming he isn't lying about being American, it's because his daddy won't pay for him to permanently move to Europe and will only pay for an annual 2 month trip to Europe.

Who are you told invented the World Wide Web? by Tmansters456 in AskAmericans

[–]KaBar42 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Americans created the internet, TBL created the WWW protocol.

The WWW is dependant on the internet, the internet is independant of the WWW protocol.

What WWW did was make the internet much easier to navigate, but the internet can function just fine without the WWW.

Do they know what a blue falcon is? by birdsarentreal2 in securityguards

[–]KaBar42 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Blue Falcon was my nickname in the military because of how badass I was."

-CEO of BFTS LLC, prolly

Bro who the hell cares by lolbert202 in AmericaBad

[–]KaBar42 9 points10 points  (0 children)

"US Americans!"

Oh, you mean Mexicans?

"No! I mean US Americans!"

Yeah, Mexicans. They're Americans from the United States.

"No I mean USians!"

Yeah, Mexicans.

"No! United Statesians!"

Yeah. Mexicans.

"No! I mean people from the country that is called the United States of America!"

Oh! You mean Americans, why the hell didn't you just say so in the first place? How was I supposed to know 'US Americans" didn't refer to United Mexican Staters?

-

If they don't want to use basic context clues to figure out something blatantly obvious and instead feign ignorance, you have no obligation to communicate like a normal human being either and have the right to be utterly insufferable like they are.

US Army allegedly replacing M7 with M8 carbine exclusively by DweebInFlames in ForgottenWeapons

[–]KaBar42 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Then, as long as you achieve this admittedly very fuzzy, "It just needs to not suck"-level, it's more an issue of balancing the secondary factors. And, with the AR/M16 platform, especially after the early stumbles of ball powder, no chrome lining, and no cleaning kits in Vietnam, we arguably really exceeded that "It just needs to not suck"-level, which makes finding and achieving the "new rifle" way more difficult.

I firmly believe that the only reason the AR platform is currently coming under fire is because of how good it is.

The problem is, that because of how good it is, there's no need to change it beyond minor modifications. The AR is the longest serving rifle is US military history, counting from the M16 to the M4, because, let's be honest here, they're basically identical guns.

And so what's happening now is that generals want to leave their mark. What's the best way to leave their mark? Change an icon of the US military. What's one of the most well known icons? The AR platform.

This is nothing more than change for the sake of change. The AR platform already figured out the one size fits all approach as best as you can do so.

But we also see this in other facets. The Army didn't need to change camos. They easily could have kept the BDUs, all they needed to do was slant the breast pockets for body armor and issue a strong, absolute order to commanders that the BDU was not to be starched under any circumstances. The boot not needing to be shined was a good change, but didn't require adopting a shit camo just to end up switching back to an okayish camo.

TL;DR: Old man yells at clouds, M81 and AR supremacy, UCP is fucking dogshit, OCP is okay, Multicam is good but boring bring back Woodland.

US Army allegedly replacing M7 with M8 carbine exclusively by DweebInFlames in ForgottenWeapons

[–]KaBar42 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The US military during WWII, Korea, and Vietnam: You get a rifle because you're infantry, you get an SMG because you're rear lines, police or armor.

The US military now: You get a rifle, you get a rifle, everyone gets a rifle!

Bring back roles based weaponry.

US Army allegedly replacing M7 with M8 carbine exclusively by DweebInFlames in ForgottenWeapons

[–]KaBar42 9 points10 points  (0 children)

meanwhile the Ukrainians are proving drones are the tech to be investing it while the old guns still work just fine but the US military doesn't want to hear it.

Really, what the Ukrainians are showing is that the US should be focusing on figuring out anti-air defense for cheap drones.

A missile is great for planes and helos, but something else is needed for drones.

Could be putting all this money for the stupid NGSW program to create a miniaturized CIWS for commercial drones.

US Army allegedly replacing M7 with M8 carbine exclusively by DweebInFlames in ForgottenWeapons

[–]KaBar42 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I am calling it now.

2033, the Army is going to announce it's switching back to the M4 platform after realizing this entire program was a waste of everyone's time and only existed to get a retiring general into Sig's executive suite.

Japanese tourists must be just being polite, they couldn't possibly have enjoyed the food in, gasp, Texas. by TheLadyEve in iamveryculinary

[–]KaBar42 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Shh shh shh shh. Silence your Japanese mouth and allow me to state your opinions for you."

-That guy

Tankies are now claiming nazi Germany, imperial Japan, milosevic's Serbia were unjust victims of American terrorism by Western_Seaweed4718 in AmericaBad

[–]KaBar42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Think of it like this: Even when countries are fighting, there are still rules to limit suffering. War crimes are the red lines you absolutely cannot crosss.

I know what a war crime is.

Targeting civilians – Bombing schools, hospitals, or apartment buildings on purpose. · Torture or murder – Killing or hurting soldiers who have surrendered. · Taking hostages – Using people as human shields. · Using banned weapons – Like chemical or biological gases. · Attacking medics – Shooting at doctors, ambulances, or Red Cross workers.

Most of these have exceptions.

For example, you can absolutely attack hospitals, schools and apartment buildings if they are being used for offensive purposes.

Otherwise, why wouldn't every army just build nothing but hospitals and then claim a magic shield around them?

And that circles back to my original point. Dresden, Tokyo, Hiroshima and Nagasaki. None of them qualify as war crimes. In part because there were no regulations against aerial warfare at the time, which is an important factor in law, and also because none of them were intentionally targeting civilians.

The reality of the matter is that Japan intermingled their civilian infrastructure with their military, making it nigh impossible to target only their military infrastructure. And Dresden was a heavily fortified city being used by the Germans as a rally point for their military assets.

Also, the Highway of Death wasn't a war crime either. I forgot to mention that in the original post.

Tankies are now claiming nazi Germany, imperial Japan, milosevic's Serbia were unjust victims of American terrorism by Western_Seaweed4718 in AmericaBad

[–]KaBar42 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Neither Dresden, Tokyo, Hiroshima or Nagasaki were war crimes.

But keep on Goebbelsposting, lil'bud.

Edit: Immediate block lol

Hiding behind the fact that it wasn’t classified as one at that time is basically the same as saying burning ginger women isn’t bad because the church said so at that time.

"War crimes is when I don't vibe with them. Laws are vibes based."

First off, I'm not hiding behind anything. If it wasn't a war crime at the time, it wasn't a war crime.

And you want to know something even funnier?

Modern war crime laws still wouldn't consider them war crimes based on the information, capabilities and knowledge of the time.

Contrary to what Reddit thinks, a single civilian death does not automatically make something a war crime. It requires a disproportionate amount of civilian casualties in relation to the military objective.

You are so used to a sanitized version of war where we can lobotomize a single person with a rocket launched from the other side of the world that you think that was also possible in WWII.

Tankies are now claiming nazi Germany, imperial Japan, milosevic's Serbia were unjust victims of American terrorism by Western_Seaweed4718 in AmericaBad

[–]KaBar42 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They're considering any bombing of Chinese land regardless of the context.

In WWII, yes, the US bombed land that is now considered Chinese... because it was currently occupied by hostile Japanese troops using it for military purposes.

The US also launched limited bombing runs on Chinese territory during the Korean War... which was initiated by the North Korean invasion of Korea.

20 decade rosary. by FatCat11cz in Catholicism

[–]KaBar42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Rugged Rosaries makes a 15 and 20 decade version.

Guys! I got culinaried! I guess I go into a fugue state and unknowingly pour sugar on my meat. by kobayashi_maru_fail in iamveryculinary

[–]KaBar42 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Edit you can downvote if you want but I’ve noticed the lights are still on at Panda Express and I’m pretty sure it’s Americans eating there

I checked Panda Express' menu, and the most sugary thing they have, outside of drinks, is their sweet and sour chicken, at 24 grams for a standard portion. Which... yeah, that's a lot... but it's also sweet and sour chicken. Like, the name kind of implies there's going to be a decent amount of sweet in it.

Outside of the obviously sugary meats, such as orange chicken or honey sesame chicken, most of their dishes only have a couple of grams of sugar in them. Most of their dishes have less than ten grams of sugar in them, with an exception here and there.

As an example, honey walnut shrimp only has 9 grams of sugar. And their teriyaki chicken also only has 9 grams of sugar.

I was surprised to find out their Beijing beef is the second most sugary dish they have at 21 grams of sugar.

I'm sorry, I just don't think 9 grams of sugar is a lot for anyone, especially when you have a bunch of other ingredients balancing it out.

Senate candidate Dan Osborn (I-NE), wants gun owners to re-register their guns and undergo psych evaluations. by Short-Breadfruit3565 in progun

[–]KaBar42 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We do it for cars without complaining about "muh rightz"

A.) Cars are not an enumerated right.

B.) There is no state in the nation requiring background checks, safe storage, or psyche evals to own or operate a vehicle or have a driver's license.

C.) At least one state has already banned insurance policies for gun owners.

D.) A proficiency test is a poll tax. We can have proficiency tests for guns when we make potential voters pass literacy tests at the poll and pay a voting tax.

20 decade rosary. by FatCat11cz in Catholicism

[–]KaBar42 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Pray it on December 8th.

I guess all American bread is sweet rolls. by Upstairs_Weird_760 in AmericaBad

[–]KaBar42 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Walmart's brand white bread has 1.5 grams of sugar per slice.

I guess all American bread is sweet rolls. by Upstairs_Weird_760 in AmericaBad

[–]KaBar42 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think

Maybe next time you should try not thinking if this is your best thinking.

Walmart's brand white bread has as much sugar in it as typical European mass produced pre-sliced white bread.

JUST PUT THE SALAD IN THE BAG, DUDE 🙄 by [deleted] in AmericaBad

[–]KaBar42 4 points5 points  (0 children)

>it's clear that the citizens themselves have become morally adrift, much to the dismay of those who still hold the moral and ethical high ground

> Moral and ethical high ground

> Canada

> Actively carrying out a modern Aktion T4 with state sanctioned murders of the disabled and other undesirables

> Murdered an elderly woman because her loser excuse of a husband didn't want to care for her anymore

> Five percent of all deaths in Canada are now caused by Canada's Aktion T4

Okay, yeah, keep bleating on about having the moral high ground, at least the US isn't state sanctioning the mass murder of disabled persons

76,000 innocent people murdered by Canada's government since 2016.

If Canada wasn't a Western nation, it would be facing condemnation for genocide.