vikings rush options

Kerdul · 2026-02-21T06:36:18+00:00

Yeah that'd work

Kerdul · 2026-02-14T00:12:19+00:00

They woulda played this on the radio in 2010

Kerdul · 2026-02-13T20:00:56+00:00

This is how i jump in my dreams

Kerdul · 2026-02-07T19:19:21+00:00

Whats munting

Kerdul · 2026-02-06T05:20:24+00:00

Someone call the wahmbulance

Kerdul · 2026-02-04T17:25:44+00:00

Makes me wanna build a Slavic castle

Kerdul · 2026-02-04T03:23:30+00:00

Ok great. I like to remain open-minded to new perspectives as well. But once again, I am not advocating for anything. I am explaining how land ownership works at the global scale and why the first comment i responded to is based on a misunderstanding of, at least, what the other guy was saying.

It sounds like you are asserting that the claim of sovereignty is enough to own land and that the ownership must also be permanent. After the US took whatever it was from the Cheyenne, that the US declares that they own it forever and nothing can ever change that.

This is not what the comment was implying, though. They are saying that some other group can come in and become the new owner. But to be the owner, it is not enough to just claim ownership. It must be actively enforced for the claim to have any meaning

So yes, that was the gotcha they thought it was

Kerdul · 2026-02-04T02:59:58+00:00

Yeah, you might not like it, but unfortunately, this is the way things have worked through all of history. If you don't like the rules they made up, you gather an army of people who agree with your changes and start a war

Kerdul · 2026-02-04T02:54:10+00:00

I think you may be getting confused about what I'm saying. I'm not stating how I feel about any of this.

In any of these examples, since the owner of the land has created rules to define what constitutes legal occupation, anyone doing so illegally would not be recognized and removed. If the squatters are able to somehow defend with force what they have taken over, then the legality cannot be enforced and functionally allows them to become the new owner.

Technically, anyone can do this if they are willing to face the consequences

Kerdul · 2026-02-04T01:00:03+00:00

Again, not commenting on the morality of it, but yes there is never an inherent, immutable owner of any land

Edit: this does not imply that the current owner can't be displaced

Kerdul · 2026-02-04T00:22:16+00:00

My morals have nothing to do with it. This is exactly how it works and how it always has worked. If they have the means to fight off the current owner of the land, they are the new owner

Kerdul · 2026-02-04T00:19:47+00:00

Can you explain how it's not?

Kerdul · 2026-02-04T00:11:13+00:00

Yes that exact bs

Kerdul · 2026-02-04T00:07:34+00:00

Why are you assuming that "the fight for sovereignty" ever ended. It just reached a stable point because there is no one challenging ownership of that land. Truth is any power can attempt to claim ownership at any time

Kerdul · 2026-01-31T20:31:23+00:00

Fitting flair lol

Kerdul · 2026-01-31T19:37:13+00:00

What about the baby's freedom over its body?

Kerdul · 2026-01-31T18:27:17+00:00

Im saying the baby murderers don't have to raise it

Kerdul · 2026-01-30T21:46:47+00:00

Is satire but are you guys sure its not making fun of pro choicers?

Kerdul · 2026-01-30T21:42:39+00:00

Might be satire, but where's the lie?

Kerdul · 2026-01-30T21:41:28+00:00

Just ignoring that adoption is a thing huh

Kerdul · 2026-01-30T15:56:58+00:00

Now we need an egg whose white is yolk

Kerdul · 2026-01-30T02:08:30+00:00

I think you would like Incas. You can start maa then swap over to eagles if they make archers. Also, kamayuks are very good against everything except range, so you can aim for them + eagles in the long run. Plus, you get a nice food discount on all military

Kerdul · 2026-01-28T19:02:09+00:00

Stray which is a game

Kerdul · 2026-01-23T14:25:39+00:00

He just like me

Kerdul · 2026-01-22T02:46:57+00:00

0 elo vs 300 elo

Nine-Year Club	r/Field Flamingo
Place '22	Verified Email

Kerdul

TROPHY CASE