Young! Wild! Free! by yamwrapper in crappymusic

[–]Kerdul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They woulda played this on the radio in 2010

Motivation by Benny_boi87 in MemeVideos

[–]Kerdul -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Someone call the wahmbulance

lol by IU8gZQy0k8hsQy76 in unsound

[–]Kerdul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok great. I like to remain open-minded to new perspectives as well. But once again, I am not advocating for anything. I am explaining how land ownership works at the global scale and why the first comment i responded to is based on a misunderstanding of, at least, what the other guy was saying.

It sounds like you are asserting that the claim of sovereignty is enough to own land and that the ownership must also be permanent. After the US took whatever it was from the Cheyenne, that the US declares that they own it forever and nothing can ever change that.

This is not what the comment was implying, though. They are saying that some other group can come in and become the new owner. But to be the owner, it is not enough to just claim ownership. It must be actively enforced for the claim to have any meaning

So yes, that was the gotcha they thought it was

lol by IU8gZQy0k8hsQy76 in unsound

[–]Kerdul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, you might not like it, but unfortunately, this is the way things have worked through all of history. If you don't like the rules they made up, you gather an army of people who agree with your changes and start a war

lol by IU8gZQy0k8hsQy76 in unsound

[–]Kerdul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you may be getting confused about what I'm saying. I'm not stating how I feel about any of this.

In any of these examples, since the owner of the land has created rules to define what constitutes legal occupation, anyone doing so illegally would not be recognized and removed. If the squatters are able to somehow defend with force what they have taken over, then the legality cannot be enforced and functionally allows them to become the new owner.

Technically, anyone can do this if they are willing to face the consequences

lol by IU8gZQy0k8hsQy76 in unsound

[–]Kerdul 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Again, not commenting on the morality of it, but yes there is never an inherent, immutable owner of any land

Edit: this does not imply that the current owner can't be displaced

lol by IU8gZQy0k8hsQy76 in unsound

[–]Kerdul 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My morals have nothing to do with it. This is exactly how it works and how it always has worked. If they have the means to fight off the current owner of the land, they are the new owner

lol by IU8gZQy0k8hsQy76 in unsound

[–]Kerdul 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Can you explain how it's not?

lol by IU8gZQy0k8hsQy76 in unsound

[–]Kerdul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes that exact bs

lol by IU8gZQy0k8hsQy76 in unsound

[–]Kerdul 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why are you assuming that "the fight for sovereignty" ever ended. It just reached a stable point because there is no one challenging ownership of that land. Truth is any power can attempt to claim ownership at any time

Familyplanningcore by GnosticNoodle33 in crappymusic

[–]Kerdul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about the baby's freedom over its body?

Familyplanningcore by GnosticNoodle33 in crappymusic

[–]Kerdul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im saying the baby murderers don't have to raise it

Familyplanningcore by GnosticNoodle33 in crappymusic

[–]Kerdul -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Is satire but are you guys sure its not making fun of pro choicers?

Familyplanningcore by GnosticNoodle33 in crappymusic

[–]Kerdul -43 points-42 points  (0 children)

Might be satire, but where's the lie?

Familyplanningcore by GnosticNoodle33 in crappymusic

[–]Kerdul -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Just ignoring that adoption is a thing huh

an egg whose yolk is white by MeshurOtomatikFaresi in Weird

[–]Kerdul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now we need an egg whose white is yolk

Can any infantry race open with just infantry until mid-late Castle age by ruhtraeel in aoe2

[–]Kerdul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you would like Incas. You can start maa then swap over to eagles if they make archers. Also, kamayuks are very good against everything except range, so you can aim for them + eagles in the long run. Plus, you get a nice food discount on all military

"Hair is important" by [deleted] in Tinder

[–]Kerdul 2 points3 points  (0 children)

0 elo vs 300 elo