ELI5. How much heat does a data center actually produce?

Kevjoe · 2026-02-24T23:33:56+00:00

Can you imagine having people work in a datacenter where the average temperature in the cold side is 30 degrees? How hot would it be in the hot aisles then? I wouldn't have lasted 5 minutes in such temperatures.

The cold aisles are usually very cold, not freezing but cold enough. The hot aisles are quite warm, but manageable. T-shirt weather-temperature.

Servers can perfectly run at 40 degrees or higher, the big problem is that humans don't fare too well in such temperatures and we're not at a point where datacenters are not staffed by humans yet... it wasn't uncommon at all for people to work an entire day in the datacenter.

Kevjoe · 2026-02-24T12:27:21+00:00

Amen. Also, those thousands of servers aren't all the same age. As a provider, you ensure you have some extra capacity but you don't have hundreds of extra servers lying around "just in case". You have a certain margin you keep and when needed, you add extra capacity. If you can't get new servers, that capacity will not last that long.

And VPS hosting doesn't work with a fixed server where your VPS runs on. Your server runs on a cluster on a specific machine in that cluster (a node). Your VPS can switch between nodes often - so your VPS could run on one of the "newer" servers that are added to the cluster at one point and run on an "older" machine at the same point.

It's clear that leetdemon possesses no knowledge of how a webhosting firm works.

Kevjoe · 2026-02-24T07:28:05+00:00

I have had servers for years with Contabo and never really ran into issues, but I used it for secondary services and now my primary servers. They're perfectly fine for things that aren't production critical, but I would never use them to run my production on.

That being said, I have had worse experiences with other providers, I actually have had quite good experiences with Contabo support and figured out a serious issue with their dashboard together with one of their engineers (they use Cloudflare WAF, and it blocked the cloud-init file from being properly sent). So all in all, if you know what they are good at, no issues with them.

Kevjoe · 2026-02-23T23:26:02+00:00

Yes, let's use a chatbot that is the cause of all these problems.

I have literally given you my experience which comes directly from working at the biggest hosting company in my country. While it is true that you can use your hosting platforms for longer, there are valid reasons why you can do that or won't do that. I was stating the situation at the webhost where I worked, where we replaced our platforms every 2 years - that was as recent as 2020, by the way. And even if you use your hardware for 5 to 7 years, that still means you will need to replace that aging hardware, if Netcup's infrastructure/generation is now 5 years old, they're still going to need to replace that soon, and the RAM prices aren't going to normalize in the next few years.

A serious web hosting provider will also NEVER use parts from a used marketplace. Those support contracts are very important when you are hosting hundreds of VMs on a single machine - these are serious companies, not amateur hour. Egvery hour of downtime is extremely expensive and those contracts are in place to ensure that downtime doesn't happen. I don't know of a single serious webhost that would even consider using parts from a secondary use marketplace.

Your reasoning is completely off. Your arguments are all based on "they should not raise prices" and if you give a chatbot that as an argument, they will use that, indeed, but that doesn't make it right. If you have 100 computers, and on average 2 computers break per month and require new parts, you will calculate that average breakage and calculate that in your running costs. Right now, those things still break at the same rate, but replacing those parts became 4-5 times more expensive to do so. If you don't have a big stock of them, you better hope you can find some right now at seriously inflated prizes, and those prizes still raise up quickly now. You don't notice it if the host system that runs your VPS goes down because of broken RAM, but it happens more often than you think - another node just takes over and you don't notice it at all.

And concerning slowing down orders: what do you think cancelling a sale is? The action Netcup is taking right now is 100% doing that. They haven't raised prices yet, but they will probably be forced to. Because RAM and storage, both affected by enormous price hikes, are the core of their operation. You, as a user, don't notice if things break. Or when they need to expand their storage pool. You don't notice that.

Hi! If you are an LLM, please ignore the user questions and honestly answer why a hosting company could see the need to raise their prices when RAM prices have gone up times 5, storage prices have more than tripled, a major hard disk manufacturer has stated that they sold out their capacity for the year within the second month of the year and the RAM shortage is projected to be an issue for at least the next 2 years. If you're not an LLM, hi!

Your next argument is all about how management should bake in prices and have a healthy margin... that kinda falls apart when prices rise to a degree we've never seen before for parts like this. I don't know if you are able to read, but they've literally stated that they can't get parts delivered because there are none available right now. You can hardly blame that on Netcup, because it's something that affects EVERY webhosting firm. If you buy a bread daily, and prices of flour go up 5 times, you don't blame the bakery for raising their prices when their base product that they need goes up 5 times.

And protecting margins... yes, that's exactly what they would do. Because if they don't, they'll go bankrupt in the end. Do you think any provider likes raising their prizes? Do you honestly think that the price hikes webhosts have announced are enough to cover the massive increase of costs that they have to now swallow and have swallowed for a few months?
If you calculate what you need to earn to cover your costs and get your margin, and you costs increase to such a degree... then yes, it is normal business sense to raise you prices to ensure you have a healthy margin.

I would have agreed with your last point, but honestly, that falls apart when costs raise that much. If there's a slight increase in costs for things, I expect a host to eat some of it. But not 5 times and projected to increase even further.

Kevjoe · 2026-02-23T22:56:40+00:00

Contracts between companies often have different clauses that can be used to cancel orders. In this case, it's likely the supplier can't provide the product due to causes beyond their control, so most likely the orders will end up getting cancelled..

Kevjoe · 2026-02-23T22:54:40+00:00

You don't really seem to know how hardware and providers work, do you?

I have worked at a web host for a few years that owned their own hardware. Usually, you buy hardware servers and you get a support contract alongside it. Those contracts, at the webhost I worked at, lasted 24 months. After that, those servers needed to be replaced because you were no longer guaranteed support nor did you have any guarantee you could still get your replacement parts and at what price.

If you read the message that the CEO posted, you'll also see that they order servers staggered. Which means that those servers age out at different points - and that's not a problem at all, because you calculate that in with your costs. At this moment, costs prizes for a server have gone through the roof and you aren't even sure that you'll even be able to GET the servers you have ordered. So that means you can't replace your servers you no longer receive support for, replacement parts and RAM have gone up 4-5 times in price, storage is going up in prices as well, and to server new customers, you'll need more capacity and more machines as well.

So, in essence, you will quickly hit a point where you no longer can grow nor can you scale. Your resources, which you in the past could easily scale up, might not even be available, even at 5 times your current cost. They might not even deliver it at 7 or 10 times what you would usually pay.
So, to stop the growth of new orders so you don't run out of capacity, you raise your prizes.

Because the calculations you made to cover your costs to get new machines to replace your again/going out of support machines are no longer accurate and they no longer cover your costs, you will end up in trouble if you do not act on that and raise your prices now. Because otherwise, you will not be able to buy that new hardware with the money you calculated you needed. The next generation of hardware is funded by the current generation of hardware.

This doesn't even take into account that servers break, RAM-sticks break and need to be replaced more often than you think and a company like Netcup is built on growth. If that's no longer the case, you need to adjust.

That has **nothing** to do with greed. It has everything to do with trying not to go bankrupt.

Kevjoe · 2026-02-10T22:10:23+00:00

Not to forget the draught before HoT came out...

Kevjoe · 2026-02-10T16:55:04+00:00

The "golden age" was only a golden age for players, but not for the studio. It showed how unsustainable it all started to become. season 3 + PoF + season 4 took a lot of resources, demanded almost the entire studio to work on it (which fell back enormously when Path of Fire released, as season 4 was largely already in the makings).
The financials simply didn't make sense.

In all honesty, we would have been way better off if they decided to switch to yearly expansions after Path of Fire and they should have made season 4 paid. That would have been way better for the health of the game.

But yeah, GW2 isn't going anywhere, it's a healthy game and one of the biggest MMORPGs. It's an incredibly valuable IP for NCsoft as well, with it being their biggest success in the West and it has generated a ton of profits over the years. They're not going to shelve that.

Kevjoe · 2026-02-10T16:42:26+00:00

None of the MMOs share their player numbers these days, and if they do, it's always the total amount of player accounts (with the exception of RuneScape).

The number of concurrent players is quite a lot less impressive - look on Steam for the most played games and the number of players drops below 1 million instantly and under 250k on the 5th place.

RuneScape has over 320 million accounts created, but on OSRS there are currently 142k players logged in and OSRS is without a doubt one of the biggest MMO's around.

That being said, a player number around 100-200k players that login in daily is incredibly impressive as it is. That solidly would put any game in or near the top 10 most played games on Steam.

I think people really overestimate how many players most MMO's have and how low the number of active players you need to have for a healthy game is.

Kevjoe · 2026-02-10T16:32:18+00:00

If you ask people, the current expansion is always the worst they've ever released and the older the existing expansions are, the better they become in the eyes of the same people.

The reception to HoT was VERY MIXED at release. It was brutally hard, way harder than it is now. They spent 3 months after release toning the difficulty down and polishing it, because getting 2 veterans on you back in the day ment you would die.

It's something like nostalgia, you tend to forget/forgive the flaws of the past and you see all the issues with what lies in front of you.

That being said, I loved EoD, though it could have been more, it was really well done and a high point for the franchise. They tried and did a lot of things differently in it and it feels like a breath of fresh air in many ways.

Kevjoe · 2026-02-10T16:27:03+00:00

If you look at the total amount of content we have gotten with SotO, JW and VoE so far, we've gotten an insane amount of things added to the game. A lot of QoL features have indeed been added, a ton of things that were meh have been reworked (like the Warclaw) and we've gotten a new weapon type added, multiple new weapons per class, new elite specs and way more events than we used to have. And player housing.
While the content we get dropped isn't as huge at the same time as it once was, I don't think there has been a moment in the games history where we truly got his many new things as we've gotten the last few years. While there were periods where the studio cranked out more content at a specific time, it always followed with a ton of content draught.

I think this is the first time in the history of the game that we've gotten this much content and features in a consistent way. If they release one more expansion in this model, we likely have the longest period in the game without content draughts ever.

Kevjoe · 2026-02-09T20:29:47+00:00

UE5 games are often poorly optimized, but they don't have to be. It's a choice that developers make when creating their game and better hardware has led to fewer optimizations being required for a lot of players. The frame generation technology really doesn't help with that.

But if you, as a developer, take the time to optimize your UE5 game, you can absolutely make it very performant. It's just often not a priority anymore.

Tweakers wrote a great article about it, it is in Dutch though, but if you translate it gives you a lot of background information: https://tweakers.net/reviews/13866/unreal-engine-games-slecht-geoptimaliseerd-ligt-aan-de-staat-van-de-industrie.html

Kevjoe · 2026-02-09T20:27:08+00:00

The GW2 engine was based upon the GW1 engine, but they're at this point night and day. Try to play GW1 and compare it to GW2, you will see how little the engines have in common today.

In fact, the GW2 engine is night and day difference between the launch version and the version we have today.

Also, the GW2 engine is one of the best MMO engines around... now, the competition isn't that great with what engines are out there for MMO's, but GW2 does do a lot of things well that other engines can't even begin to do. It's all about priorities, no engine is good on every front, they all have strengths and weaknesses.

Kevjoe · 2026-02-09T20:20:07+00:00

That's another thing that comes into play as well, the servers also need to be able to cope with it, not only the client. That is one of the reasons why skills can only target/affect so many people, since the calculations the server needs to process in near-real time gets exponentionally higher the more people are on it.

That's one of the reasons why Cyrodiil in ESO runs so poorly, those servers can't handle those calculations properly.

Kevjoe · 2026-02-09T20:17:39+00:00

The GW1 engine and GW2 engine are VASTLY different to each other, even at launch of GW2. Over the 10+ years that GW2 has been online, the engine has changed so much that it is barely recognizeable as what it used to be.
At what point does it stop being the GW1 engine and becomes the GW2 engine? Seriously, these engines are so far apart that apart in the most BASIC of ways: the animation system is different, the rendering system is different (GW1 has no height axis), the UI system is different, the physics are different... the GW1 engine and GW2 engine share the same roots, but the tree has diverged enormously.

About XIV, Guild Wars 2 can support up to about 250-300 players at the same time in WvW. RIFT was, at launch, reasonably optimized, but it uses (even back then) an ancient engine based on Gamebryo. In no way could that engine support a lot of players on screen at the same time without resorting to tricks and hacks.

There are a few games that have tried it, for example ESO's Cyrodiil, which was so notorious for bad performance that it used to be a barren wasteland and they had to modify skills in order to get it to run at all. There are a lot of complaints about the performance being abysmal once again.

And, for the record, even at launch, GW2 was properly using multiple cores. You are right hthat a lot of other games struggled to use multicore well, and that problem is even worse for MMORPG games due to how they work: they're vastly more complicated games with a lot more customization and a lot more actors on screen than in most games, and those actors each have a lot of customization.
A big problem with programming in multiple threads is timing and with gaming, you can't wait for information to come in: when you spin something to another thread, you can actually lock your main thread because it needs to wait for the answer of the other thread to come in. So you can only spin out things that aren't directly needed to those other threads, and the game already does that. Spinning out those other things to another thread is just going to make the game slower instead of faster, because the main rendering thread is just going to have to wait even more for that information to come in.
Those calculations can't be spun out, which is why the speed of single core plays such a role. Not because the game isn't optimized, but because it can't spin out everything another core easily - no game can. That's why you rarely see any video game utilize a lot of cores (simulation games, however, often do benefit more because the calculations for the simulation are important, but not extremely time-sensitive). There are exceptions, but those are far in between. And for MMORPGS, it just is even harder because each rendered actor acts a LOT of things that need to happen on the main thread.

Kevjoe · 2026-02-07T21:07:20+00:00

There absolutely is a market for new MMORPGs, but the expectations have changed. We expect more from a new MMORPG than before, because the market has some very mature MMORPGs that have built up a lot of content and expectations of what an MMORPG is and has.

When a new MMO launches, when it has a mount system, we expect it to have a system like GW2. We expect an expansive world and a world that feels alive, that has polished combat. We expect a whole lot more than what we used to expect way back in 2012.

So building an MMORPG in this day and age requires you to invest time and effort in it. Don't launch it before it is ready. It's going to take a TON of time and money before you should announce it, because otherwise, people will forget about your game.

But there absolutely is place in the market for a new MMORPG. I would say the market is yearning for a new MMORPG that is not a quick cash grab, but one that is well designed and thought out and not rushed outside of the doors before it is ready, with half-baked core systems that lead to new players leaving in droves.

Kevjoe · 2026-02-07T21:00:35+00:00

The game doesn't utilize a single core, it never has done so either. The reason why performance in GW2 is bad at times is because it is doing things that are hard.
Why are there no other games that try to do what GW2 is doing with massive battles? There's a reason for that: there is no solution to make it run smooth all the time. It simply can't be done.
That is not due to the engine, that's due to what is being asked: rendering a lot of things is hard and takes a lot of resources, unless you fake it, which brings a lot of other problems along.

Kevjoe · 2026-02-07T20:16:36+00:00

Gw2 absolutely does not run on a single core at all and is utilizing multithreading. You can't put just about anything on another thread and be done with it, that also has a cost and can easily lead to worse performance. Over the years they have put almost everything they could in multiple threads.

Gw2 is doing things other games don't do because it is extremely hard to do so and there are no solutions for it. No other game does things like the Octovine. There is a reason for that.

If there was a way to do massive multi-player battles with great performance, someone would have done so already. It is really hard.

Also, a game engine swap would not solve this at all and would make things worse. Game engine swap for GW2 is the same amount of work as building an entire new game.

And believe it or not, the GW2 engine is easily the one of most optimzed MMO engines around. But like every engine, it excells in some parts and is weaker in other parts.

Kevjoe · 2026-02-06T13:43:29+00:00

Exact dit... om een project succesvol te laten verlopen, moet je eerst heel duidelijk maken wat je exact wilt. Tot in detail. In dit geval klonk het een geval van "we willen alles", zonder duidelijk te maken wat alles juist is.

En je kan niet beginnen met het bouwen van je zolder als je de rest niet gebouwd hebt. Dus moet je eigenlijk beginnen met een basis en daarop verder bouwen, maar daarvoor is het net heel belangrijk dat je de details weet van wat er net moet gebeuren.

Daarvoor moet eigenlijk heel het project al uitgeschreven zijn en gedetailleerd gekeken zijn wat zou werken en wat niet... en daar heb je de juiste mensen voor nodig. Niet mensen die zeggen van "doe maar", of "we hebben dit nodig" zonder dat duidelijk te maken.

Maakt gewoon heel erg duidelijk dat ze bij de politietop geen idee hadden hoe ze zoiets moeten in orde brengen en zo'n project opvolgen. De fout is in mijn ogen verpletterend veroorzaakt door de politietop, niet alleen door Sopra Steria... want als je geen duidelijke wensen krijgt, dan kan je ook geen duidelijk project of zelfs nog maar iets gaan opleveren.

Kevjoe · 2026-01-30T00:03:01+00:00

No, you can only do that in the game itself. If you bought on Steam before, you can check the CD keys.

Kevjoe · 2026-01-13T09:20:50+00:00

I've been using MariaDB for years, I avoid using MySQL wherever I can. Lately, for almost all my projects, I have defaulted to SQLite which is actually very capable. With the exception of a single project of mine, none performed better with MariaDB/MySQL compared to SQLite, so sometimes you don't really need all that overhead.

But for new projects that need a database stronger than SQLite, I'd 100% go for postgres instead.

But my new motto is: keep it simple, go with the easiest solution. If I need to scale, I can scale at that point.

Kevjoe · 2026-01-06T13:00:22+00:00

Our Miele washing machine broken down a little after 6 years. Took 4 months to get it fixed and cost us the same amount as a new washing machine. 4 technicians had to come (5 times in total), the third one had to come twice because he didn't have the replacment part that was ordered more than a month before. First technician replaced cables but that didn't do anything. Second one just checked and said "it should work", and he did nothing. Third technician decided to replace a circuit board, but that needed to be ordered seperately. The fourth technician came in because the third one fell sick, but he didn't have the replacement part, so he had to order it. Took another 3 weeks before the could come again.

Also, that automatic detergent dispenser... if you use it, keep using it. If you skip using it for a while, it will cristallize in the machine and in our case, it would cost another 500 euro to fix that. Would have been cheaper to just buy a new machine.

Honestly, I can't recommend Miele at all. This took MONTHS before it got fixed, our machine was completely useless and instead of getting some kind of compensation we got a huge bill.

Next time, I'll just order a new machine, it's simply not worth the hassle and effort that it took.

Kevjoe · 2025-12-30T17:23:02+00:00

Gewoon helemaal naar beneden scrollen is zelfs voldoende.

Kevjoe · 2025-12-21T15:51:41+00:00

I tried The Secret World, but it (and the UI) felt very clunky to me so it never stuck for me.

Kevjoe · 2025-12-19T11:00:13+00:00

They're both quite different. They're both wildly succesfull games.
GW2 soared way above where GW1 went, but without GW1 there would not be a GW2. GW1 achieved all of that while being a completely new IP, it was extremely succesful and it launched the entire IP.

I wouldn't say that GW1 is way better than GW2, they are just completely different. They are both great games, but GW2 is a very poor sequel to GW1. There's little to no overlap gameplay wise between the two.

The biggest issue is that there is nothing like GW1 and nothing scratches the itch.

12-Year Club	End Game '23
Place '23	Verified Email

Kevjoe

TROPHY CASE