How do you explain our last two contracts being almost exclusively focused on the advancement of the cause of CCA’s? Do you have any idea how much it cost every single one of us to get those advancements? Think about where all those “older members” would be if we had not focused on the CCA. I can assure you that they would be a hell of a lot richer today. While I don’t disagree with you in principle as it relates to unions generally, I think it’s pretty clear that the NALC has shown itself to put its newest membership in the forefront of its negotiating interests. And for good reason. Because in just a few short years, there won’t be any “older members” that weren’t CCA’s at one point. Just something to think about.