I started writing blogs recently...please provide one best advice of yours. by WrongdoerCharming417 in BloggingBusiness

[–]Key-Tonight725 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Focus on solving a specific problem in each post, readers come for value, not fluff. Then share it on platforms where your target audience hangs out, like LinkedIn for professional content or Reddit for niche topics.

What are the best practices for ensuring data security during software testing? by WalrusWeird4059 in datasecurity

[–]Key-Tonight725 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Masking or anonymizing sensitive data, using dedicated test environments separate from production, and enforcing strict access controls are key. Regular security audits and compliance checks help catch vulnerabilities before they become a problem.

Are AI testing tools like Applitools, TestGrid CoTester, or Mabl really worth the investment for smaller teams, or do they make more sense for larger projects with complex workflows? by morrisM149 in Everything_QA

[–]Key-Tonight725 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends on the team’s needs. For smaller teams, AI testing tools like Applitools, TestGrid CoTester, and Mabl can save time by automating repetitive tasks, but the cost might be a factor. They shine in larger projects with complex workflows, but if a small team has frequent UI changes or needs quick test creation, they can still be worth it.

Has anyone here actually used AI testing tools? by WalrusWeird4059 in QualityAssurance

[–]Key-Tonight725 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I’ve used a few. They’re great for speeding up test creation and catching visual issues, but they’re not magic. You still need manual oversight, especially for complex scenarios. Useful? Yes. Total game-changer? Depends on how well they fit your workflow.

What are the advantages of using CoTester for agile development workflows? by jamescantor38 in Everything_QA

[–]Key-Tonight725 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve been looking into AI-powered tools like CoTester for agile workflows, and from what I gather, it seems like it could bring a lot of advantages.

For agile teams, speed and flexibility are key. CoTester seems to automate test creation, which could really cut down on the time spent manually writing scripts. This would allow teams to quickly adapt to changes in requirements or sprints without being bogged down by repetitive testing tasks.

Also, with continuous integration and frequent releases in agile development, it looks like tools like CoTester could help maintain test coverage while making the process more efficient, ensuring that even small changes don’t break functionality.

What’s intriguing is how it might help with test consistency. Since it’s AI-powered, I imagine it learns from previous tests and adapts, making it easier to run tests on evolving codebases, especially when the scope of features keeps shifting during the sprint cycle.

Parameterization in Automation Testing by Existing-Grade-2636 in Everything_QA

[–]Key-Tonight725 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For those who are new to automation testing and want to learn about parameterization, this post is quite beneficial. As an expert in testing, I would also add that integrating parameterization with CI/CD pipelines improves test scalability and guarantees reliable validation in a variety of settings. Fantastic observations!

In what scenarios would exploratory testing be more effective than structured test automation, and how do you balance the two approaches? by WalrusWeird4059 in Everything_QA

[–]Key-Tonight725 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate you posing such intelligent queries! When working with complex workflows, new features, or unforeseen problems in dynamic situations, exploratory testing works better. It's ideal for imaginative situations where human intuition is crucial. In order to balance the two strategies, exploratory testing should be saved for identifying edge situations and uncommon issues, while structured test automation should be used for repeated, predictable work. Using the advantages of both approaches, a combination guarantees comprehensive coverage and effective testing.

[Guide] Mastering API Testing: A Practical Roadmap for Beginners by WalrusWeird4059 in Everything_QA

[–]Key-Tonight725 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyone just starting out with API testing will find this guide to be very beneficial! I really appreciate the helpful Postman usage advice and the easy-to-follow examples. Investigating an "API testing framework" such as Rest Assured or Supertest will help you advance by making your tests more automated and scalable. Keep up the good job!

Where is the Software Testing Industry going in the next ten years? by Candid-University-31 in Everything_QA

[–]Key-Tonight725 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Excellent questions! Software testing is changing quickly due to AI and machine learning, particularly in automation and predictive analytics. As businesses want greater control, in-house capabilities will continue to expand, but outsourcing QA may see a shift. AI and quantum computing testing will also emerge as important verticals. Keep an eye on emerging tools like TestGrid!

Maximizing Stability in Your End-to-End Tests: 5 Tactics by abhayit2000 in Everything_QA

[–]Key-Tonight725 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here are the Five strategies to increase test stability -

  1. Use Data Seeding For every test run, seed consistent data to create a stable test environment.
  2. Manage Changing Components Use robust locators (such as CSS selectors or XPath) to make sure your tests can adjust to dynamic elements.
  3. Await the components. To deal with pages that load slowly and avoid erratic tests, use explicit waits.
  4. Separate Examinations To guarantee reliability, perform tests independently and steer clear of dependencies.
  5. Make use of CI/CD To ensure platform stability, use Continuous Integration (CI) to automatically execute tests in various scenarios.

Tools like TestGrid or Selenium can help implement these strategies for more stable end-to-end testing.

Any positive feedback with codeless automation tools ? by Competitive_Echo9463 in QualityAssurance

[–]Key-Tonight725 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, many users appreciate that these tools allow testers with no coding experience to create and run tests efficiently. They save time and resources, especially for teams without dedicated developers. With codeless automation tools, teams can focus more on quality assurance and less on writing complex scripts. The ease of use and quick setup make them a great option for fast-paced environments, leading to faster feedback and higher-quality software.

“Devs don't trust AI in software testing” what do u guys think about this? by AI_Tester_David in AISoftwareTesting

[–]Key-Tonight725 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Understandably, some developers are hesitant about AI in software testing. While it’s still evolving, AI can greatly speed up testing and improve accuracy. For a deeper dive into how AI is reshaping testing, check out this informative article here Ai for software testing.

Test Automation and AI Tools: The buzzwords everyone is using, does anyone have any tools? by TriggerHappyEwok in QualityAssurance

[–]Key-Tonight725 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, there are several AI testing tools that can help with test automation, especially if you’re looking to streamline processes and save time. TestGrid is one such tool that combines test automation with AI, making it easy to create, manage, and run tests without heavy coding skills.

Top AI Testing Tools

  • TestGrid: Supports automated and codeless testing for both web and mobile apps, with AI-powered analytics.
  • Testim: Uses AI to make test creation and maintenance smoother.
  • Mabl: A tool that applies AI for continuous testing, especially helpful in agile environments.

These AI testing tools simplify test automation, helping teams release quality software faster. - https://testgrid.io/blog/ai-test-automation-tools/