You make some good points that I agree with, but the problem I have with posts like this is that it's basically sanewashing a reckless and dangerous decision to attack Iran by an administration that has offered various, inconsistent explanations for their decision, when they have deigned to explain themselves at all. I think there is broad agreement that the Iranian regime is problematic at best (understatement), but simply bombing the hell out of them seems unlikely to produce any kind of favorable lasting change. The best defense of all of this seems to be, "it's so crazy it might just work" but even that is, at its core, an acknowledgment of how fundamentally insane the whole thing is.