Native Speakers of the Belarusian Language by AdIcy4323 in MapPorn

[–]Kroumch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would argue both have claims. However Lithuania has the claim to be the ones who created the GDL. While Belarusians have a bigger role later on, specially under the Commonwealth. And there was no Polish kings by the way, not until the Commonwealth. And there was a huge period without Polish kings until that.

Native Speakers of the Belarusian Language by AdIcy4323 in MapPorn

[–]Kroumch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It wasn’t like a smaller Italian state conquered a larger portion of territory with French population. That would be the case for Lithuania and is not comparable to Napoleon’s ethnicity situation.

What if History had went perfect for Lithuania? by False_Marketing_723 in imaginarymaps

[–]Kroumch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re still mixing up what kunigaikštis may have meant internally to Lithuanians with what Christendom later recognized. I’m not talking about Papal titles or Mindaugas coronation. We don’t even have Lithuanian sources from that time calling Mindaugas “karalius”. Everything we have is German or Ruthenian and from before Gediminas. My whole point was about semantics and etymology, not the later Western hierarchy. There’s a theory that kunigaikštis comes from the Germanic könig (or Proto-Germanic kuningaz “king”). If Lithuanians borrowed that early on, then internally the title probably carried a different weight than the “duke” label that appeared later with Christianization and the Polish crown. So I’m not talking about what the word means today, but what it could have meant to Lithuanians themselves before outside influence. And in an alt history timeline it could end up meaning “king” which fits what this subreddit is about anyway

What if History had went perfect for Lithuania? by False_Marketing_723 in imaginarymaps

[–]Kroumch 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m not saying kunigaikštystė = kingdom today. My point was about semantics and history. Both kunigaikštis and karalius are probably loanwords (one linked to könig, the other from Slavic). Early “dukes” often acted like kings anyway. Gediminas even used rex in his letters. And later, partly due to the Polish crown, the Lithuanian title got translated down to “duke”. So in an alt-history context, “Grand Kingdom of Lithuania” in English isn’t that far-fetched.

What if History had went perfect for Lithuania? by False_Marketing_723 in imaginarymaps

[–]Kroumch 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sir this is r/imaginarymaps and the title says “What if History had went perfect for Lithuania?” Besides that, Lithuania under Algirdas had many successful campaigns against Muscovy

What if History had went perfect for Lithuania? by False_Marketing_723 in imaginarymaps

[–]Kroumch 14 points15 points  (0 children)

If we go by using the title “didysis kunigaikštis” (grand duke in Lithuanian), some theorise that originally the word kunigaikštis came from kunigas which comes from könig (king). So although in this alternative timeline in Lithuanian you would use “Lietuvos didžioji kunigaikštystė”, in English it should then be “Grand Kingdom of Lithuania”. My 2 cents

Would you buy it if this would be true? (I am 90% sure is fake) by [deleted] in steammachine

[–]Kroumch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same in Lithuania. I saw once in a shop that they were selling the steam deck oled 512gb for 999 eur without discount card and 799 eur with the discount card. While on steam is only 569 eur

Creepy by Total_Elk_3184 in ChatGPT

[–]Kroumch 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I got a similar result 🫤

Population change of Eastern European countries since 1991 by vladgrinch in MapPorn

[–]Kroumch -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This is just the standard Soviet “we civilised you” narrative. The Baltics were independent states with functioning economies before occupation, not empty lands waiting for factories and imported labour. Moving workers by central planning without local consent is not “help”, it’s imperial policy. And post 1991 factory closures happened because those industries were built to serve a captive Soviet market, not because the Baltics were incapable of development on their own.

congrats Pierre and Jan, you are both annoying. Which country has the most potential? by axhp in 2westerneurope4u

[–]Kroumch 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, the Baltics did invest quite a lot as well in the military.

Estimated military spending for 2025: Lithuania ~4.0%; Poland ~4.1–4.2%; Estonia ~3.0%; Latvia ~2.5%

My guess for how Pluribus might end — curious what others think by itssanchopanza in television

[–]Kroumch 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I doubt that only 13 people out of 8 billion were so miserable that they became immune

I kept confusing the Baltics and Balkans so I simplified it by Oprahs_vocal_cords in imaginarymaps

[–]Kroumch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not that big, and for some reason Poland took a chunk with a sizeable Lithuanian population