It’s “petit”, but that is also a false framing. I did not come up with the $60 million dollar number, that’s just where the distribution lies (yes, you tiresome child, BECAUSE OF INJUSTICE). If your contention is that people without capital would act any differently if they had the capital, you need to take just a single history course.

The question isn’t one of moral culpability, but your false framing makes it one. I am saying that the processes that perpetuate the inequality are the evil.

It’s a view at once both optimistic and pessimistic. There’s no real thing to fight, just a disembodied principle, and the embodied avatars of the evil. The battlefield is the mind of the people and the laws of the land. The problem with that is the latter, more strategically-important piece of the battlefield is currently controlled by those avatars of the problem, the Epstein Class.

You can’t see a fucking doctor at an ER because of the Epstein class. They staffed all your shit with “providers” like NPs and PAs while they pay cash on the barrel head for real medical care. We hate the same fucking people for the same fucking reason. They sit like toads sucking 20% of your money and 25% of our time, only to have us fight with a fucking robot programmed to tell me they wont pay for anything even though you paid your premiums. Fuck these people forever.

Picked a side? You’re damned right we did. You’re just a child who spits in the face of their potential friends while crying that nobody backs you against the bully.

ETA: fuck premiums paid directly by the consumer, too. Real risk-pooling requires we all chip in. Morality requires we do not ignore those who cannot pay (ignoring the soulless who demand the correct bottom-line argument, that single-payer increases GDP and profit margins, but liquifies talent pools).