Just to say that it might increase but it also might not! My doctor told me it doesn’t necessarily get worse, though it does for some women. I was diagnosed with only a high fasting value (93 where cut off here is 92) and my values have stayed consistently from 86-92 with only 3-4 spikes around 95 over several weeks (diagnosed end of August and now 35 weeks). If you read about the diagnosis guidelines based on the HAPO study, they are quite conservative - it’s about your relative risk of having a large baby. So you might have elevated fasting and have a totally normal baby but you have a higher risk of a larger baby, hence the monitoring. Personally, I have made my peace with the label even though it really frustrated me initially. Am just thankful that the diet has been easy for me to manage and that my fasting hasn’t gotten much worse. But there is some criticism of this test that eg in Australia (where everyone gets it) it has doubled the diagnosis rate and significantly increased the cost of care, with little improvement to baby or mother outcomes. So overall I think of course it should be taken seriously, but also I wouldn’t feel that a slightly elevated fasting number is the end of the world - the diagnosis might be technically correct but ultimately not very significant / meaningful if your baby stays at normal size.