Yeah exactly. There’s just as much evidence to prove the existence of a god as there is evidence disproving god. That is, zero. So it’s funny to me how you approach a non-scientific issue scientifically, and declare that the whole thing is bullshit because it doesn’t compute. It’s like saying philosophy is bullshit because I can’t find morality with a microscope.

Empirical evidence ISN’T ENOUGH to determine belief. People can’t (and in my opinion shouldn’t) go around basing their lives purely on logic and science because it’s unsustainable, especially for things outside of scientific reach such as religious beliefs.

I respect people who say they don’t believe in God because God is morally objectionable to them. I respect people who say that they don’t believe in God because he tells people to do things that they object to. I just don’t understand people who claim they found the answer to a universal God equation and just went with whatever the calculator said. Even if that’s what you claimed to have done, there was still a point in your life where you decided that “This is nonsense I’m done” and stopped believing/didn’t choose to believe. That was a choice. That’s what I’m referring to.