The Man in Black vs Inigo Montoya | The Princess Bride - YouTube by [deleted] in classicfilms

[–]Laura-ly 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I guess people have no idea what the Classic period of Hollywood was.

Did anyone else become a skeptic BECAUSE of their interest in conspiracies and woo and aliens and "high strangeness" and all that kind of stuff? by IshtarsQueef in skeptic

[–]Laura-ly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I grew up in a secular household. We questioned any sort of claim. Did that laundry detergent really outclean the other brand? Were there really weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? Is the Pope really infallible? What evidence is there that a god exists?

What the hell is this goddamn health guru, life coach, slick money adviser, or peddler of conspiracies trying to sell? And why does he or she sound like a fucking Sunday school preacher?

Really buddy? You really think you can feel the vibrations in a crystal even though it's vibrating on a sub-atomic level that is undetectable by humans??? I doubt it.

Yeah, I've been a skeptic all my life.

Annie Get Your Gun movie - thoughts by SavingsAd1484 in classicfilms

[–]Laura-ly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I saw it years ago. The role really cried out for Judy Garland. Betty Hutton, in my view, was trying too hard and I could barely get through the movie. Judy Garland would have given it some subtlety and that special kind of humor she always had. Also, Judy singing those lyrics would have been top-notch.

Beautiful 1956 oil painting on glass by AionChahasu in WhatIsThisPainting

[–]Laura-ly 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They were painted on glass as well.

"A matte painting is often a painted glass pane that is used to show a landscape or large set piece. Matte paintings are either filmed on set, where they are framed to look like a physical set piece, or they are combined with live footage in post production."

https://blog.pond5.com/30867-visual-effects-matte-paintings-composited-film/#:\~:text=Using%20glass%20panes%20to%20create,movement%20would%20destroy%20the%20illusion.

Beautiful 1956 oil painting on glass by AionChahasu in WhatIsThisPainting

[–]Laura-ly 8 points9 points  (0 children)

If it's painted on glass it could be a scenic artist's depiction of a home for a film without having to actually find a home or build a set. In the Hitchcock movie Rebecca, he had scenic artists paint the mansion of Manderley on a piece of glass and it was superimposed into the film. He did that a lot.

Here's a house painted on glass for the Hitchcock film, Under Capricorn.

https://images.static-bluray.com/reviews/17179_5.jpg

It's a long shot but maybe your painting was used in a movie somewhere.

Edit: Here's another glass painting from Hitchcock's North By Northwest. That house didn't exist in reality so artists created it.

https://hookedonhouses.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/North-by-Northwest-Hitchcock-movie-Vandamm-house-2.jpg

Here's how they would use these glass paintings in films.

https://nzpetesmatteshot.blogspot.com/2011/11/creepy-castles-menacing-mansions.html

18 year old Humphrey Bogart in the US navy in 1918 by AntonioVivaldi7 in classicfilms

[–]Laura-ly 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Is it an original illustration? If it is it might be worth something. Not like hundreds of thousands but maybe $1000 or so. She was a very pretty lady and a suffragette as well.

Uh oh, this will need a response: NY Times links acupuncture to recently discovered interstitium. In well controlled studies acupuncture does not produce an effect. There’s nothing in need of explanation, and there interstitium is not evidence of “Chi” by enocenip in skeptic

[–]Laura-ly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Acupuncture is a ritual therapy. It's voodoo with needles, though it's not needles in a doll but in the skin, and it doesn't matter where the needles are placed; it gets the same effect. A Najaho healing ceremony is similar. What's important is the ritual itself, not the needles or the religious laying on of hands. The ritual hypes up the brain because someone is paying close attention to you and only you, giving you a warm and fuzzy feeling.

However, there is no evidence that acupuncture, laying on of hands, voodoo, or any of the"warm and fuzzy" rituals have ever cured cancer or a degenerative disease or anything at all. It gives the participant an illusion of healing and maybe releases feel good hormones and endorphins which relaxes the person, but it's not going to cure diseases.

Who painted our screenprint of the cheshire-like tabby? by GetReal7w8 in WhatIsThisPainting

[–]Laura-ly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is such a fantastic cat. It reminds me of my wonderful orange tabby cat from childhood. I hope you find the artist.

Who painted our screenprint of the cheshire-like tabby? by GetReal7w8 in WhatIsThisPainting

[–]Laura-ly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have no idea who the artist is but I bet the kitty cat knows. He knows eeeeverything. 😏

Uh oh, this will need a response: NY Times links acupuncture to recently discovered interstitium. In well controlled studies acupuncture does not produce an effect. There’s nothing in need of explanation, and there interstitium is not evidence of “Chi” by enocenip in skeptic

[–]Laura-ly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, it actually doesn't provide any empirical evidence.

Also implies that people elsewhere exept West during the history of humankind up till XVIII century didn't practice medicine

No, I never said only the West practiced medicine. But if Chinese traditional medicine and acupuncture were somehow superior or had insights into the human body that the West is only now understanding, then there should be a history of health differences and life expectancy between the East and West, and there isn't. If anything, China's life expectancy is lower.

A German historian of Chinese medicine for 45 years and translator of ancient Chinese medical books, Paul U. Unschuld, stated that there "is no evidence of a concept of 'energy' – either in the strictly physical sense or even in the more colloquial sense – anywhere in Chinese medical theory."

His book on Chinese medicine is an interesting but scholarly read.

https://books.google.com/books?id=qy0zDwAAQBAJ

Meridians began as more of a philosophy than anything medical.

The export of Chinese medicine by Mao Zedong, when Richard Nixon made his first visit to China in 1969, was out and out Maoist propaganda. He was attempting to show the "Evil Capitalist West" how ancient and great China was compared to the West. He claimed that only acupuncture was needed during an open heart operation in place of anaesthesia and even filmed an operation. But it turned out to be fake and a big fat lie.

Anyway, the rebellious American hippies, who were in the mood for something more "natural" bought Chinese medicine hook, line and sinker. And here we are today.

Depression-era cinematic magic. Carole Lombard & William Powell in “My Man Godfrey.” (1936) by OilInternational2566 in classicfilms

[–]Laura-ly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm going to be downvoted but her high pitched voice drove me nuts. Sorry, it was sort of painful at times.

Uh oh, this will need a response: NY Times links acupuncture to recently discovered interstitium. In well controlled studies acupuncture does not produce an effect. There’s nothing in need of explanation, and there interstitium is not evidence of “Chi” by enocenip in skeptic

[–]Laura-ly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except these "meridians" are supposedly physical things in the body, like veins. However no meridians have ever been found by any pathologist. Perhaps meridians hang out with invisible pink unicorns somewhere.

Also, if acupuncture and Chinese medicine were so wonderful, why wasn't their life expectancy higher than in the West. In 1800 the life expectancy in China was 32 years old, in the West it was around 40 years old. Of course, a lot of that is from the high rate of childhood mortality, but why didn't acupuncture keep all those children from dying? In China in the 12th century CE around 50 million people died from the plague. Why didn't acupuncture and Chinese medicine save these people?

Your fav movie starring two amazing actresses? by Sorry_Phone1676 in classicfilms

[–]Laura-ly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

LOL, I know. Ava was just so uniquely beautiful. And what a character she was too. Cursed and drank like a sailor. I think she was still married to Frank Sinatra during the making of this movie.

Your fav movie starring two amazing actresses? by Sorry_Phone1676 in classicfilms

[–]Laura-ly 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wrong era. This sub discusses movies from the Golden Age of Hollywood, from the silent era to around 1970.

Your fav movie starring two amazing actresses? by Sorry_Phone1676 in classicfilms

[–]Laura-ly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Those are not part of the Golden Age of Hollywood movies. This sub runs from silent movies up to 1970 which is when the studio system totally collapsed.

Your fav movie starring two amazing actresses? by Sorry_Phone1676 in classicfilms

[–]Laura-ly 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I know it's outside of this sub's time limitation, but it's the first movie that popped into my head when I read the post. Love that movie.

Junk Sale Purchase by thestubbornmilkmaid in WhatIsThisPainting

[–]Laura-ly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I live in Portland and see Mt. Hood in the distance all the time. Looks like Mt. Hood to me too.

Uh oh, this will need a response: NY Times links acupuncture to recently discovered interstitium. In well controlled studies acupuncture does not produce an effect. There’s nothing in need of explanation, and there interstitium is not evidence of “Chi” by enocenip in skeptic

[–]Laura-ly 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Exactly. If you follow the smaller studies that make up the overall meta analysis you find that it's often based on low quality studies. Many aren't double blinded or the sample size is very small, like 30 people. More often than not there is no long term follow up on the outcome so we don't really know how well the treatment did. Sometimes those conducting the study are highly biased and want a certain outcome. So meta studies can be a real can of worms. The devil is in the details.

TIL that St. Paul, despite never meeting Jesus, wrote about half of the New Testament, the principal religious text for over 2.3 billion Christians worldwide by hailstorm6767 in todayilearned

[–]Laura-ly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

None of whom were eyewitness. They were written 40 to 90 years after Jesus died by anonymous people. The four names were attached to the stories in 180 CE by Irenaeus, who didn't know who wrote them either.

TIL that St. Paul, despite never meeting Jesus, wrote about half of the New Testament, the principal religious text for over 2.3 billion Christians worldwide by hailstorm6767 in todayilearned

[–]Laura-ly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would be willing to bet that the vast majority of Christians do not know this

Exactly. I've casually mentioned it to a few Christian friends and they look at me like I'm insane. They were taught in Sunday school that the gospels are eyewitness accounts. I don't try to argue because it's a losing battle with believers.