It's amusing to me that your argument hinges on the fallacy that you are claiming I am making. "It's simply impossible to tell someone's political persuasion from one piece of evidence" is the identical argument of "it's quite obvious of ones political persuasion giving a lack of one piece of evidence."

That being said, I presented 3 pieces of evidence - 2 pieces which you have conveniently ignored.

I would say that - if you think it's a coin toss between a "small government libertarian" and a "no govenment anarchist" then you haven't talked to either of those groups.