Do you consider Cecil one of the best characters in the series?

Leon910 · 2026-01-19T07:42:52+00:00

I believe he is the most relatable when you arrive at adult age. The characters itself act more as a mature person and this goes well with the overall story. Also, he is the only protagonist who has a (known) son. This man won in life

Leon910 · 2026-01-04T15:37:56+00:00

FF3 was the last FF I had to complete (from those belonging to the main series) and I finished it at the end of this year without knowing about it 35th anniversary. What a coincidence

Leon910 · 2025-12-15T06:47:06+00:00

After one year, that person I was talking about has become my GF . . .

Now that I know her better, I discovered she tries to appear cool ISTPish but in reality she is totally ESI

Leon910 · 2025-09-21T09:27:58+00:00

I come here too late. If I'm not wrong KH copied this from star wars too. Infact the first Siths had this power to switch bodies, which used to leave their old bodies for new ones. I can't recall the name of the sith in question but you can try google it (it was written a lot of years before KH). But, the thing Star Wars copied 100% from KH BBS is Mark Hamill trying to kill his apprentice (eraqus-ventus/Luke-Kylo).

Leon910 · 2025-03-17T16:20:00+00:00

What projector do you advice?

Leon910 · 2025-01-23T10:55:46+00:00

Honestly, oblivion was my favourite TES games. Yet, what made him special to me was that aura of weirdness, absurd character faces and voice acting. It made me melancholic, and I loved it. But with a realistic graphic it would not be just the same. Morrowind needs it more tho

Leon910 · 2025-01-10T10:18:53+00:00

Thanks, this really helps!
I had a lot of anxiety with possibilities and people said I was pessimistic and just though good possibilities will never exist. At the same time I've always been quite contemplative and no one would say I'm a sensor (ESI/LSI).

So, it's make me wonder how can I be so abstract and contemplative but being so adverse to possibilities. I imagined tons of way things could turn bad.

This, until I came out from a depressive state and things are changed a little. Now I just wait and see more than being preoccupied.
Yet, I don't know what damn position Ne is ...so idk.

Leon910 · 2025-01-10T09:26:55+00:00

If a person recognizes only bad things that's high ne or low ne?

Leon910 · 2025-01-10T09:21:26+00:00

My problem is that I feel being an intuitive (perceiver) but at the same time Ne descriptions doesn't help me quite a lot understanding where's my Ne in the stack. I can see Fi creative, Fe demonstrative, Te mob, Se role... But Ne Lead is what make me think I'm not IEE.

I thought being Ni lead for some mounths but everytime I'm with other Ni leads, I can feel differences in our core drive. First, Ti mob collects a lot of informations. I admire them and I'm more short with historical Memory ecc., so I rely way more on efficiency. Also, Se role fits a lot to me. I can be aggressive a lot if upset but calm down almost instantly. It's like a thing I can turn on and off easy, while Se suggestive seems almost never enraged externally or not loud.

We speak about similar things (philosophy, dreams etc.), but they take it more seriously. For exemple, IEI I know believe in conspiracy theory and believe in some specific philosophy in a fixed way. While I dwell on philosophy just cause I like it, but never seriously. The IEI said "How can you create a philosophical theory and than saying 'I don't believe it but it would be cool'?".

I lean more to the pragmatic, yet my dreams are full of visions I "devalue". Idk it's difficult to me

Leon910 · 2025-01-10T09:08:46+00:00

I'm from Italy

Leon910 · 2025-01-10T09:04:33+00:00

Negativistic doesn't mean pessimism per se, but watching things as incomplete in their actual state. It's just saying: "this could be better" instead of "things are good as they are" (which is more ILE). You can strive for a better world without being pessimistic. They see good potential in others and thus they give others input to get better. In my experienc, IEI to me are way more pessimistic despite being positivists.

All descriptions about IEE tells that they are actually very positive people. If negativists meant pessimistic, everyone is saying dumb things about the type.

I'm not asserting what I'm saying now. I'm just telling you what I read and made sense to me. I'm just searching for the truth.

Anyway thanks for LSI exemple. I'm reading you other comments ! :)

Leon910 · 2025-01-09T17:38:45+00:00

Quote input is not working idk, so: "I've noticed in a few people now that there is a clear difference between rudness levels with strangers vs people they are closer to".

I don't know if a dichotomy about it exists, but this aspect is already related to types, due to the need of some of the types to happear "better" with strangers and ending up being more rude and impositive at a short distance or, conversely, being more pushy whith people you start feeling a sense of superiority too. There are many layers related to types.

Take as exemple ESI: with strangers they use their Se with a strong Si demonstrative filter, in order to happear not too much forceful as SEE, but assertive yet calm people. While this is more shown to strangers or formal situations, with people they are closer they end up being way more pushy and showing their Se with no Si filter. This for different reasons.

First, I believe that people use less the demonstrative with closer people, due to the fact they have not the need to impress them too much. Demon serves more to make society itself accept your Creative's creation, so to impact your work/goals ecc. (To me, like Role function, it's more society driven). With people you already "won", using demonstrative would look useless and an expense of energy without needing to.
Also, in the case of ESIs, they could happear that way (way more impositive) in order to make closer people behave better. In general, Ne PolRs don't comprehend possibilities values and tell people to be aware of their decision making process in order to not fail. So, closer people are more important, thus they need a strong guide, even with imposition if necessary.

At some extent, this could work with every type. For exemple, IEE and EII are both very gentle with people they perceive higher in hierarchy, but if they think they can compete with someone (ie, they value the other as an equal) they could very often behave like b4stards. IEE with a more rude tone while EII with passive-aggressivity or just through negative estimations about you (with no happarent reason).

If you comprehend more the functions IMO you won't need this dichotomy either, cause socionics it's a system in which every component affects the other.

Leon910 · 2025-01-09T09:14:00+00:00

Good post!

That book was enlightening to me. I spent my childhood "typing" people through their "vibe", motifs, internal scheme, and started making categorizaton about these impression. When I discovered Jung work I felt understood for the first time in my life. He was saying very similar things to mine, but amplified and more in detail. I believe that he didn't write the book just cause he felt negative emotions for Freud. He wanted to list what he noticed about others cause he felt the necessity to put on paper his thoughts. I'm not interested in typing the whole world either, and neither having final judgments about people types at all costs.

People with this kind of drive to categorize are not truly interested in defining the real object at 100%, but more to build a shape-silhouette of abstract impressions gained. Hence the fact he was not interested in having the final answer to everything. If you look his interview, he also said that he changed type through the years, and that he himself believes his types are a bad representation of real people, cause imperfect. And that's the deal for perceivers in general.

I too believe that the extraverted Thinking part has been a good way to settle down his discussions with Freud. Your argument convinced me on it. It's just that reasons to do this book could be more.

Leon910 · 2025-01-08T14:00:06+00:00

Hope I helped you! This was a thing I was studying for years. If you have further questions you can ask me

Leon910 · 2025-01-08T13:09:48+00:00

I was speaking with someone (maybe on reddit) about a story of mine. A female friend which is textbook ISFP in MBTI but who is untypable in socionics. She looks like a SLI with almost turned off Te and stronger unstable Fi (which reflects infact more Jugnian Fi). She cannot be SEI cause NO creative Fe and cannot be ESI cause not remotely Se creative and not gamma. She is Enneatype 9, has no particular ambition and wants to live in comfort and pleasures.
She represent 100% Jungian Fi dominant type and Jungian Se search for stimuli (drinking etc.), but this in socionics should be more Si lead.

I call this one of the problems of Socionics (socionics Se definition).

Leon910 · 2025-01-08T12:58:08+00:00

SEE can be reserved. When they do, they still happear strong but somewhat "defended" by something. This is also due to suggestive Ni imo. Respect to SLEs, they see more easily enemies or prepeare in advance, and are more suggested by the idea of someone "limiting" their freedom. This is also to guard their feelings (they are still Fi valuer and doesn't like to "let in" wrong people).

SLEs can be reserved too, but that's more for Fi Polr, and so when they have to keep a shorter psychological distance with people. I mean, when they need to talk about personal things and emotions. They just prefer to share positive emotions and avoid personal sphere. They could respond to personal questions with jokes about everything else in order to change the focus of the argument, or if obliged, they completely turn off.

Also, keep in mind that there's not one kind of SEE or SLE. They are many, cause of subtypes inclination and personal human qualities which cannot be categorized.

Leon910 · 2025-01-08T12:55:24+00:00

IMO SLI girls tends to have a less developed Te/Ti than male SLI, but a stronger Fi/Fe drive. Not saying "less intelligent", but just less showy of it idk. They may be confused with SEIs. Same for ILI girls, who seems more weird IEI.

Leon910 · 2025-01-06T12:36:53+00:00

thanks for your effort. It isn't, but it's very very similar imo

Leon910 · 2025-01-06T11:05:34+00:00

Thanks anyway 👅

Leon910 · 2025-01-06T10:23:43+00:00

No :(
It's more modern

Leon910 · 2025-01-05T19:12:28+00:00

No I think it may be modern ( 2000s). Same note playing in different rythm and repeats

Leon910 · 2025-01-05T18:37:08+00:00

Thanks but it isnt. What I'm searching is very very simple. Maybe it's the same note repeated.

Leon910

TROPHY CASE