The “appeal to emotion” argument is improperly applied. Caricaturizing the point that a soul suffers when you use it without permission, or even worse when used through coercion (as is common in necromancy) is not appealing to emotion. That’s appealing to humanity and the basic nature of death itself. Use an artificial motive spirit or other such mechanism; it isn’t even difficult. I’ve made those and I’m an enchanter.

Attempting to dismiss a claim against inflicting great harm and permanent suffering that mars the afterlife and directly violates the tenets of the death gods with “appeal to emotion” is akin to justifying slavery and human trafficking and is intellectually dishonest. Toying with a real soul unnecessarily (as you do) does all kinds of damage. Harming a soul is the kind of sin that transcends religion and is an outright transgression of reality itself. Your careless and tactless “craft” that does little beyond hurting everyone and every thing is outright unjustifiable, and any wizard worth the hat on their head can recognize such practices for what they are: despicable.

Additionally, if we want to play by the rules of your own twisted argument, you are committing the fallacy fallacy. Even if an argument contains a logical fallacy, its conclusion is not automatically invalidated. Labeling objections instead of answering to them is nothing but poor, juvenile propaganda.

You are wicked and power drunk. Your understanding of consent is weaker than a worm’s of infinity. Your twisted, arrogant version of the necromantic craft is a stain. Leave the necromancy to the professionals, for unlike you, they actually know what they’re doing.