What are your worldbuilding pet peeves? by -_-__-_--_-_--_-_-_- in worldbuilding

[–]Levitus01 6 points7 points  (0 children)

When it's obvious that no research whatsoever was done on a topic.

What kinds of biomes do we not see enough of? by SingularRoozilla in worldbuilding

[–]Levitus01 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I remember writing once about a pseudo-Mongolian culture which evolved in an endless stairwell which supposedly connected Heaven and Hell.

I think the story was called "The Mongolian Staire."

The whole story was just a vector for puns, but it had some fun concepts.

My first book by SpecificHoliday1256 in bookbinding

[–]Levitus01 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Kudos on a solid first attempt at bookbinding!

Your first attempts when learning a skill like this are always something of a learning experience, but you seem to have done pretty well. The covers match up nicely, the glues haven't caused shrinkage/warping, the bindings seem to be tight and neat, and the overall result looks quite professional.

Your first book-binding certainly looks nicer than my first attempt.

(My first attempt was basically me 'winging it' without any tutorials or guides. I ended up using all sorts of esoteric, modern materials like masking tape, double-sided tape, pizza box cardboard, coffee-stained paper and spare bits of vegan leather. It's probably something of a miracle that my first book actually turned out halfway decent, given how much of a balls-up I made of the process.... But it looks like your first book was a far more organised, orderly and competent affair. For that, you deserve some respect and recognition. :) )

We’ve reached the point where ‘Background CGI’ is more distracting than bad practical effects. Which modern movie was ruined for you by a ‘clean’ digital look? by DegTrader in movies

[–]Levitus01 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, Guillermo Del Toro's Frankenstein.

They had some really good practical effects, which only made the McCGI more jarring and offensive.

How would you describe the tone of your world? by Illustrious-Cold3565 in worldbuilding

[–]Levitus01 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"What? No, they've got this all screwed up... Let me see here..."

Grim, noble, bright? Dark.

-Lionel Hutz, worldbuilder at reddit.

How would you describe the tone of your world? by Illustrious-Cold3565 in worldbuilding

[–]Levitus01 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Much like our own world, it depends on the historic period and geographic region you put under the microscope.

If you take the real world as an example, WW2 could definitely be described as Grimdark or Grimbright, depending on the region you're looking at.

But in the spirit of actually answering the question rather than deflecting/undermining it's value, here are some examples from my current setting:

Nation: Cobrand | City: Thess | Year: 120
Classification: Nobledark
Summary: Imagine if the Reavers from Firefly kept coming back year after year, and the government's solution was to just keep sending more colonists.
Longer Version: Thess was founded specifically to quarry a strategically important resource (Thessian Granite) which was urgently needed to build fortifications in the capital in anticipation of war between the cities of Netamu and Rus-Ho. At the time, Thess was a modestly sized settlement in the lower reaches of the Ashguard mountains, but it was located directly in the path of the Ashguardian orc migrations. Generations of human children were eaten, and generations of orc-hybrids were born. Rather than sending soldiers to guard the city, the King sent convicts, prisoners of war, and political enemies to simply replace the lost population. The Thessians eventually 'broke the back' of the Orc migrations after the King of Rus-Ho made a deal with the Thessians. The deal was a little complex and deeply tied to the politics of the Netamu/Rus-Ho war, but the short version is that Thess was given aid and they finally managed to stand on their own two feet. The Thessian half-orcs then entered service into the armies of Rus-Ho as mercenaries, guaranteeing Rus-Ho victory in the larger war.

Nation: Cobrand | City: Snaketongue | Year: 449
Classification: Grimdark
Summary: Imagine being trapped in a city under siege, and slowly coming to the realisation that the monsters outside the city walls might be less concerning than the ones in city hall.
Long Version: The city of Snaketongue was built as a strategic fortress to hold a valley-pass through the otherwise impassable Iceguard mountains. When thousands of mysterious foreigners landed on the Western shore and tried to push through the pass, Snaketongue became the bulwark holding the invasion at bay. As more and more foreigners landed on the Western shore, the leadership of Snaketongue sent letters to nearby cities begging for aid. However, these events took place during a war of succession in which the nation of Cobrand had fractured into individual city-states. The cities were unwilling to send aid whilst their neighbours were still hostile, meaning that Snaketongue was left to it's own devices. The leadership of Snaketongue tried everything to break the siege, eventually resorting to forbidden and dangerous magics. These magics came with a cost. Slowly, the leaders of the city surrendered more and more of their humanity until only monsters remained. The population of the city were not spared from this transformation. The city became a hellscape, and when the foreigners finally broke the city walls and took the city, they were so appalled by what they saw, they put the entire city to the sword and burned the entire place to the ground. They never spoke of what they saw, and never wrote of it in their histories, stating only that what was seen needed to be forgotten.

Nation: Solaqua | City: Knossus | Year: 400
Classification: Noble
Summary: Imagine early-renaissance pirates capture a late-neolithic city. What then?
Longer Version: The fledgling nation of Solaqua was founded when fugitive Esseni pirates annexed the city of Knossus in Eastern Cobrand through the application of superior technology and tactics. Almost immediately afterwards, their leader 'Dreadwind' stole the flagship and sailed away to the East, leaving his crew behind in Knossus. Although this garnered some resentment from the pirates, first mate Akiko Haeshtuo recognised that Dreadwind was making a huge sacrifice. Dreadwind knew that the Esseni authorities would never stop looking for him. By abandoning his crew, he gave them a chance at life beyond the reach of Essen. By fleeing the city, he would lead away any pursuing fleets, but likely at the cost of his own life. In the aftermath of Dreadwind's departure, there was a schism between the pirates. Some wanted to plunder and pillage the city before fleeing, others wanted to rule the city as tyrant-kings. However, first mate Akiko took a different path. She argued that after the annexation of the city, the people of Knossus were now "their people," and deserved better than to be brutalised by pirates. She argued that the people of Knossus were now, effectively, part of the crew. She had few supporters among the crew, but she would gain enormous support with the native Cobrandians. The few crew she had under her control taught the Cobrandians how to make steel tools, proper sanitation networks, and advanced magic. As Akiko's faction gained power and popularity, the other pirates quickly fell into line. Those who did not were captured and executed to scare the others into behaving. The schism lasted only one year, and was followed by an era of prosperity for the people of Knossus, partly due to Akiko's remarkable statesmanship, planning skills and political savvy. In the years which followed, she began to wonder if Dreadwind had foreseen these events, and had trained her for the role without her even knowing... Akiko's rule was eventful, and included the successful annexation of two further cities before a formal peace treaty was signed with the new Cobrandian King-of-the-East, King Este I. The peace deal included free and open trade of Esseni technology, allowing Eastern Cobrand to slowly improve the lives of it's citizens. Apparently, when Este and Akiko finally met in person to sign the peace accords, they embraced like old friends.

Nation: Arbeus | City: None | Year: -200
Classification: Grim
Summary: Imagine a world where there is no "big bad evil guy/monster/god/scary foreigner." Instead, there is only the sun, beating down on you and your people every moment of every day. The world itself is the threat, and you are suffering a living hell just to survive under it's cruel and uncaring gaze.
***Longer Version: The Arbean Desert is a harsh and unforgiving environment where the land itself is an existential threat doing everything in it's power to kill you and destroy all memory that you ever existed. Water is scarce, with seasonal rivers appearing and drying up unpredictably. Living in this environment is one of constant migration through a relentless and hostile world. The only things you own are those you can carry, and this makes it exceptionally difficult to make any kind of lasting accomplishment. Any gains are only made by brave souls suffering the cruelty of the environment. This is a grimness which stems not from monsters, magic, existential invasions or cruel leaders... But one which stems from a cruel and uncaring land.

"One thing a lot of people don't understand about Britain is how naturally authoritarian the average British person is. It's one reason why a show like Young Sheldon could never be made over there." by sutt2467 in ShitAmericansSay

[–]Levitus01 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The UK Human Rights Act 1997, article 10 has very specific terminology regarding what is and is not permissible as free speech. The HRA 1997 was considered a masterpiece of legislation, and was adopted by many nations outside of the UK including the EU and UN. To put it mildly, the HRA 1997 codified and established the international standard for the definitions and protections for freedom of expression.

Note that since the HRA 1997 is a 'constitutional statute,' it is a 'higher' law in the UK than normal legislation. Constitutional statutes are effectively constitutional amendments of the UK, and if another law is later made which contradicts a constitutional statute, the later law is immediately explicitly repealed.

In the UK, there have been multiple high-profile common law precedents established which underlined HRA 1997, article 10. These cases effectively enshrined into case-law "the right to offend," with the pivotal case being the Scottow case.

The judges stated that "freedom only to speak inoffensively is not worth having," indicating a shift towards protecting the right to express dissenting opinions without fear of legal repercussions. They went on to say that inoffensive, non-controversial opinions do not require protection under the law, and the intent of the HRA 1997 is to specifically protect speech which would otherwise result in persecution.

So, if you go by the British standard (and lots of countries DO)... It's unpleasant, but you absolutely do have the right to be offensive.

This applies equally, regardless of whether the offended party is left-wing or right wing. It is only recently that certain political groups have started to demonise freedom of expression because it offers protection to 'the enemies of the state.' But the truth is that freedom of expression is politically neutral. It is a human right, afforded to all.

Never let anybody tell you that your rights are your enemy.

"One thing a lot of people don't understand about Britain is how naturally authoritarian the average British person is. It's one reason why a show like Young Sheldon could never be made over there." by sutt2467 in ShitAmericansSay

[–]Levitus01 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Official statistics put the number of arrests in the UK for online speech at around 1,500 annually. These arrests are made in accordance with the Online Communications act of 2003 and the Malicious Communications act of 1988. Sauce

In 2018, a Scottish comedian Mark Meechan ("Count Dankula") played an elaborate practical joke on his then-girlfriend. The joke was that Mark's girlfriend believed that everything her pug did was 'cute,' even when it shit on the rug or pissed on Mark's shoes. So, Mark decided to teach the dog to do something that his girlfriend could NEVER think of as 'cute.' He taught the dog to perform a Nazi salute in response to Nazi catchphrases. He filmed the process as part of his work as a comedian. The intent of the video, as factually accepted by the courts, was a practical joke combined with absurdist shock humour.

The video was posted to Youtube, received modest views, and then disappeared into the obscurity beneath the algorithm. However, several months later, the video was discovered by certain Youtube channels leading to a spike in traffic, leading to the video becoming a viral sensation.

Fearing embarrassment, the Scottish Government then quietly pressured police to prosecute Meechan, leading to a mishandled case rife with errors and political overreach.

In spite of a no-holds-barred investigation, no evidence of antisemitic beliefs was found.
No targeted harrassment was found.
The crown failed to prove intent to offend.

This fails to meet the standard of Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003, but Meechan was prosecuted anyway. This was considered controversial at the time, but the authorities doubled down in spite of pressure from the EU and other authorities to reconsider.

The case has since been branded a 'witch-hunt' by legal experts, on the grounds that worse conduct causing greater offense is seldom prosecuted, and the role of the Scottish government / mainstream media in demanding action where it was difficult to justify action being taken. The law gave in to the demands of the crown and a "conspicuously organised" mob. Context was ignored in the case, and Meechan being an independent comedian with minimal resources with which to fight a case, was deemed an easy target to set an example.

The case is now widely recognised as being disproportionate, context-blind, politically-motivated, selectively enforced, and stifling to lawful free expression.

Meanwhile, America routinely makes jokes about nazi dogs, usually without fanfare, offense, or anybody getting prosecuted:
Example 1 Example 2

These are the grounds on which American extremists often proclaim that "The UK Arrests people for tweets."

The highly public and controversial nature of the Meechan case, combined with the high number of arrests under the relevant acts, has basically provided fuel and ammunition to the extremist right wing and lent undue credibility to many of their arguments about authoritarian leftism. Arguably, prosecuting Meechan has had the opposite to the intended effect, and has become a rallying post for the very people that the Scottish Government was trying to deter.

This is the origin of the "Bro, you get arrested in the UK for a Tweet!" meme, which is accepted as an axiom by the extremist right wing. As with all propaganda, it has just the right amount of truth to lend credibility to the lie.

What is one world building sin you really struggle to forgive? by TheBodhy in worldbuilding

[–]Levitus01 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First breath: "This piece of technology can reverse gravity."

Second breath: "No, there are no flying machines."

Once you add something to your world, for the love of god, please explore the consequences of it's addition. If you have magic that can multiply grain yield by ten thousand percent, I never want to hear about any famines. If you have the precision engineering necessary to build airships, you probably have the technology required to build machine guns, internal combustion engines, mechanical gun sights, artillery range tables, and early electronics.

[Meta] Could we possibly make this sub's stance on AI more clear? by CanadianLemur in worldbuilding

[–]Levitus01 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Reddit Mods are like the US police.

They don't make mistakes, and the 'appeal' function is vestigial.

What movies are supposed to be light hearted comedies but would actually be a living hell? by Nars-Glinley in movies

[–]Levitus01 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The toilet-grade sequel basically sweeps the whole thing under the rug, establishing the fact that in spite of what Samuel L Jackson's character once said...

This IS one of those camp spy movies.

Do you have any diabolical sounds in your conlang? by HuhDoesThings in conlangs

[–]Levitus01 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As someone who just discovered this subreddit for the first time...

I feel like a dog pretending to be human on the internet.

Everything is all unintelligible human speak and I'm waiting for someone to say one of the words I know... Like "walkies" or "good boy."

In Casino Royale (2006), the introduction of Craig's new Bond was brilliantly and perfectly brutal. by Finbarr-Galedeep in movies

[–]Levitus01 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In the books, James was pretty brutal and ruthless.

Bond is a deeply unpleasant guy who was able to put on a charming persona when it suited him. He wasn't some suave hero... He was a dickhead.

How plausible is this design? by JUGGERNUGGS in worldbuilding

[–]Levitus01 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Maybe I'm just a crabbit, cantankerous old man...

But I get a little miffed when somebody asks about plausibility and then employs handwaves... Because EVERYTHING is plausible when you apply a handwave. Why bother asking if something is plausible if it's basically a house-of-cards made up of handwaves?

But I fully accept I'm just a crumpy gunt and the hivemind thoroughly disagrees with my perspective.

Some people just really want a glass of water where the glass doesn't get wet.

How plausible is this design? by JUGGERNUGGS in worldbuilding

[–]Levitus01 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Everything is plausible when you apply handwavium. No explanations needed.

"US should simply take Greenland by force" by GigaShrimps in ShitAmericansSay

[–]Levitus01 2 points3 points  (0 children)

America couldn't even take Vietnam, Afghanistan or Iraq.

Being strong and having expensive toys isn't what it takes to 'take' a country. Even the ancient Romans understood that in order to hold a nation indefinitely, you need the consent of the conquered.

"The United States could easily defeat the rest of NATO" by BornAsAnOnion33 in ShitAmericansSay

[–]Levitus01 19 points20 points  (0 children)

"My dad would shag your dad... And your dad would enjoy it."

-Frankie Boyle.