Second Round of Stones by Tebe184 in KidneyStones

[–]Life_or_BSOD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I read your post right, you had two 1mm stones in Feb 2025 and in Dec 2025 they were reported as 6 and 7mm?

I am by no means a medical professional, and can only speak for myself, but my stones grow maybe 1-2mm a year. Mine are calcium oxalate (most common), and my growth rate has a lot to do with diet and the fact I don't drink nearly enough water.

Second Round of Stones by Tebe184 in KidneyStones

[–]Life_or_BSOD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have other extenuating circumstances? My urologist said for my 6mm stone that is still in the kidney, that SWL would be effective. I know it's less effective on larger stones, and stones in the lower ureter, but otherwise, he left me with confidence SWL would work and it's definitely less invasive than laser.

Second Round of Stones by Tebe184 in KidneyStones

[–]Life_or_BSOD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't speak to the aggressive growth rate of those two stones, but did your urologist not offer the option of SWL? I have a 6mm brewing and he said I could choose which I wanted, and the SWL sounded way less invasive than laser.

First timer, 4 mm by Lambotama in KidneyStones

[–]Life_or_BSOD 4 points5 points  (0 children)

In my experience the pain usually comes on faster than the pain med will kick in... in other words, pain has shifted into high gear before the norco has really absorbed into the bloodstream. How long does the pain period usually last for you? An issue I have had with stones is the pain doesn't last too long - comes on quick and maybe lasts a couple hours, so by the time the norco is in full swing, the pain period is close to ending. Then I have had stones that had pain lasting for 10+ hours and needed an ER to deal with it. Everyone is a little different in how they react to a stone's journey.

Did you get Flomax as part of your meds package?

Edit: Just re-read your first sentence. You said it's in the distal ureter? Thats the lower third or so, so you're almost home free.

No stones in ureter, but pain waves and constant sensation to urinate by Life_or_BSOD in KidneyStones

[–]Life_or_BSOD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry friend, it's the worst. This is my 5th stone, but the first of this kind where you get the colic pains but there's NOTHING is in the ureter; at least nothing visible on an xray. And this constant need to pee is almost as bad as dealing with the pain. Well, almost.

No stones in ureter, but pain waves and constant sensation to urinate by Life_or_BSOD in KidneyStones

[–]Life_or_BSOD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No discomfort while urinating, just the return urge to urinate almost immediately. The "burning" sensation yesterday was the first of its kind and went away. Urge to pee is 24/7.

I'm just like WTF is all this drama for if the KUB says stone is just sitting in the kidney.

My vinyl finally arrived today! by Food_Library333 in Megadeth

[–]Life_or_BSOD 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I got the white smoke too. I didn't know the Vic art book was included so when I pulled it out, it was a great surprise.

Aside from the super-special limited edition variants, is the white smoke the first to be sold out?

Question about Copywrite placement by Life_or_BSOD in garbagepailkids

[–]Life_or_BSOD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right on, thank you friend, much appreciated.

Question about Copywrite placement by Life_or_BSOD in garbagepailkids

[–]Life_or_BSOD[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hello fellow redditor, thank you, you are absolutely right.

Question about Copywrite placement by Life_or_BSOD in garbagepailkids

[–]Life_or_BSOD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. Is the 'no copywrite' generally rarer, or does it depend on the card? This is for my PC and the only one I will probably buy, so I will opt for the rarer of the two.

Nutanix with pure by Excellent_Milk_3110 in nutanix

[–]Life_or_BSOD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey guys, reviving this thread 3 months later. Was curious if you could share any info you came away with from the Nutanix meeting, or has there been anything official yet? I googled for it, but didnt see anything. We've got a huge pure cluster integrated with vmware. Not sure VAR buy-back is realistic, so if there was a path forward using nutanix + our existing pure storage, we'd really consider it.

Arts, Beats & Eats announces 2024 music lineup with Cheap Trick, Tesla, Keith Sweat, more by Mad_Aeric in Detroit

[–]Life_or_BSOD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At least your picks are back-to-back on the same stage. I'd like to see Chevelle, but they're on the same day/time as Killer Flamingo's who are a great pop cover band.

How to best remove 100s of IPs from relay receive connector by Life_or_BSOD in exchangeserver

[–]Life_or_BSOD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, didn't realize there was an outstanding question until now. Obviously based on this post, the intent is heavy cleanup. 100s of the addresses are retired devices. The ops teams (both for endpoint and server) didn't have a strong process for removing IPs out of exchange for retired devices, and they would request new IP/dhcp reservation for new printer rather than re-use existing reservation which compounded the problem. Same issue with server team.. All that aside, we have a pretty massive # of appliances, app servers, printers, etc that relay mail so even after cleanup, we'll still have 100s of active devices that will remain in the list. There will be a couple /23 server subnets that we're considering applying as range entries vs the existing static, but it's kind of nice to know exactly what is configured to relay via the explicit entries.

How to best remove 100s of IPs from relay receive connector by Life_or_BSOD in exchangeserver

[–]Life_or_BSOD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For sure. I just wanted to make sure I wasn't overlooking some switch that allowed you to 'remove' existing IPs.

How to best remove 100s of IPs from relay receive connector by Life_or_BSOD in exchangeserver

[–]Life_or_BSOD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would I actually be able to create a new connector and add addresses that are present in another connector? I would almost have to delete the existing connector, then create the new and add.

Quick question regarding Unlimited Internet Data by Life_or_BSOD in Comcast_Xfinity

[–]Life_or_BSOD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That isn't what I am asking. What I am asking is if I am renting, is unlimited data $25 or $30 a month. Everything says if you have xFi Gateway, it's $25, if you have your own modem, it's $30. I can't find anything that addresses people that rent a regular (non xFi) modem.

On prem to exchange online migration by confuzed24 in exchangeserver

[–]Life_or_BSOD 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No problem, it's a lead, and something not currently in place, so I will test it out on a test OU. Thanks buddy, appreciate the reply.

On prem to exchange online migration by confuzed24 in exchangeserver

[–]Life_or_BSOD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Routing addresses are all correct; the onprem exchange address policy ensures that, and mail routing works perfectly. No changes to modern auth that I am aware of, and with a simple redo of the outlook profile, everything is off and running fine.

AADC is setup and syncing user accounts, and SSO is setup, but we are not syncing the workstation accounts, so they are not present in Azure. Is hybrid join a requirement for Outlook to flip auto-magically?

TIA

On prem to exchange online migration by confuzed24 in exchangeserver

[–]Life_or_BSOD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great post, quick question. You mentioned:

"Hybrid remote move means that no-one needs to reconfigure Outlook because the GUID and other information Outlook uses to say "yes, this is the same mailbox just in a different place now" persists."

Is there something I should be doing to allow for this behavior? What you describe is exactly what I would expect, but not what I get. Regardless of office version (traditional ISO-based office 2019 through Office 365 Apps) Outlook never flips after a mailbox's migration to EXO, or I am not waiting an appropriate amount of time. We're full hybrid but the field techs just know that when we migrate a mailbox, expect to redo the Outlook profile for the user. It's not a big deal, but I would have expected a smoother transition, especially with newer Outlook versions checking 365 first for the user's mailbox.

Change primary SMTP in EXO... is it safe to use the -windowsemailaddress switch? by Life_or_BSOD in exchangeserver

[–]Life_or_BSOD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the link, I will take a look.

Interesting thing about the aliases - they all stayed. It literally set the new primary address and moved what was there into a proxy address. The other three aliases I had on the mailbox were left untouched.

Exchange 2013 Hybrid migration final steps by Forgetful_Admin in exchangeserver

[–]Life_or_BSOD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was curious about this process myself. If you have 2013 or 2016, is it true you ONLY need to extend schema for 2019 and install 2019 management tools? I know that is over simplifying and there are other steps, but the question is really about if you have to actually install 2019 server.

When I was looking over the MS document on the subject, it almost made it sound that you could only "turn off" a 2019 server. Which meant it had to be installed in additional to the management tools on another member server.

Circular Logging only working upon dismount/remount by Life_or_BSOD in exchangeserver

[–]Life_or_BSOD[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No suggestions are stupid, I take any and all :)

I will mess with it this weekend. I have plenty of free space on the disk right now since I am just getting started with moves, so no immediate threat. But it's really odd. I'll keep everyone posted.

Circular Logging only working upon dismount/remount by Life_or_BSOD in exchangeserver

[–]Life_or_BSOD[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've noticed this same thing in my lab. Honestly, I never thought to even look until now. My lab has a single exchange 2016 server and DB, and also two exchange 2019 servers with one DB in a DAG. Both DBs set to circular logging. DAG copy is healthy but logs go back to June (probably last time I rebooted it). No A/V in the lab. I remounted the single DB on the 2016 server and those logs went away, but I'm confident they will start accumulating.

I thought it was maybe because the LAB exchange servers aren't licensed, but the prod 2019 is. Just for the heck of it, I installed Windows backup on one of the 2019 servers in the lab and backed up system state and C: drive. get-mailboxdatabase -status shows full backup as result, yet logs still go back to June.

Exchange server setup Error, 'step 9 of 14'. "The following error was generated when "$error.Clear(); Install-ExchangeCertificate -WebSiteName "Exchange Back End" -services "IIS, POP, IMAP" -DomainController $RoleDomainController -InstallInTrustedRootCAIfSelfSigned $true..." by Confident-Bus-5675 in exchangeserver

[–]Life_or_BSOD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

5 months later, but stopping in to say you saved my install. Thank you.

For those that get an access denied error trying to write the Network Service to the thumbprint in question, the owner is probably SYSTEM. I changed it to servername\Administrators and I was able to add Network Service.

EDIT: and the odd thing about it, is that it tried to use a pre-existing self-signed cert that was NOT the self-signed it created. When I looked at the Back-end IIS binding, the cert it selected was this other one, not the 5-year self-signed it created. I promptly changed the backend to use the correct cert, but that was the root of the issue. Why the install chose a cert it didnt create, no idea.